Undergrad How to find inverse coordinates?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on finding inverse coordinates from a set of parametric equations involving constants a, b, and c. One participant suggests simplifying the equations by introducing new variables x', y', and z' to eliminate the constants and treat the problem like polar coordinates. Another participant argues that this approach neglects the coordinate u, which is crucial for the transformation. The conversation highlights differing opinions on the validity of the proposed transformations and their implications for solving the equations. Ultimately, the participants agree that while the initial method may complicate the process, it is not fundamentally incorrect.
Rick16
Messages
158
Reaction score
46
TL;DR
given are x(u, v, w), y(u, v, w), z(u, v, w), and I want to find u(x, y, z), v(x, y, z), w(x, y, z)
Is there a systematic way to do it? In particular, I have the coordinates ##x=au \sin v \cos w##, ##y=bu\sin v\sin w##, ##z=cu\cos v##, where a, b, c are constants, and I want to find ##u(x,y,z)##, ##v(x,y,z)##, ##w(x,y,z)##. I could solve the three equations for u, v, and w and then try to insert the resulting equations into each other, and with a lot of fumbling around I may get the solutions that I want. But this does not seem to be the most rational approach.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I would first get rid of the constants and introduce ##x'={(au)}^{-1}x\, , \,y'={(bu)}^{-1}y\, , \,z'={(cu)}^{-1}z## and then operate with them like the usual polar coordinates, e.g. ##x'^2+y'^2=\sin^2(v)## etc.
 
Thank you very much. I was able to solve it quickly with these substitutions.
 
fresh_42 said:
I would first get rid of the constants and introduce ##x'={(au)}^{-1}x\, , \,y'={(bu)}^{-1}y\, , \,z'={(cu)}^{-1}z## and then operate with them like the usual polar coordinates, e.g. ##x'^2+y'^2=\sin^2(v)## etc.
You lost the coordinate ## u ## and you have to operate with the usual spherical coordinates.
 
Gavran said:
You lost the coordinate ## u ## and you have to operate with the usual spherical coordinates.
I did not.
\begin{align*}
x'^2+y'^2&=(au)^{-2}x^2+(bu)^{-2}y^2\\
&=(au)^{-2}(au \sin v \cos w)^2+(bu)^{-2}(bu\sin v\sin w)^2\\
&=\sin^2 v\left(\cos ^2w+\sin^2w\right)\\
&=\sin^2 v
\end{align*}
And, yes, my substitutions make a sphere out of the ellipsoid. This has to be reversed at the end of the calculations.
 
fresh_42 said:
I did not.
\begin{align*}
x'^2+y'^2&=(au)^{-2}x^2+(bu)^{-2}y^2\\
&=(au)^{-2}(au \sin v \cos w)^2+(bu)^{-2}(bu\sin v\sin w)^2\\
&=\sin^2 v\left(\cos ^2w+\sin^2w\right)\\
&=\sin^2 v
\end{align*}
And, yes, my substitutions make a sphere out of the ellipsoid. This has to be reversed at the end of the calculations.
I mean that your transformation from xyz-Cartesian coordinate system to x’y’z’-Cartesian coordinate system is wrong because in the equations you got the spherical coordinate ## u ## can not be seen.
“get rid of the constants”, what you said and what is correct, does not mean to get rid of the constants and the coordinate ## u ##.
 
Gavran said:
I mean that your transformation from xyz-Cartesian coordinate system to x’y’z’-Cartesian coordinate system is wrong because in the equations you got the spherical coordinate ## u ## can not be seen.
“get rid of the constants”, what you said and what is correct, does not mean to get rid of the constants and the coordinate ## u ##.
This is not wrong. It might only be more work to do. I showed a path, not a solution. ##u## is a radius and scaling it back again is no problem.
 
fresh_42 said:
This is not wrong. It might only be more work to do.
So it is better to use the next transformations: ## x'=a^{-1}x ##, ## y'=b^{-1}y ## and ## z'=c^{-1}z ##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
4K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
705