How to find inverse coordinates?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding inverse coordinates from a set of parametric equations involving constants and spherical coordinates. Participants explore various methods to express the parameters u, v, and w in terms of x, y, and z, considering the implications of their transformations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests a systematic approach to find u, v, and w from the given equations, expressing concern about the rationality of their initial method.
  • Another participant proposes eliminating the constants and transforming the coordinates to simplify the equations, likening the process to polar coordinates.
  • A participant claims to have successfully solved the problem using the suggested substitutions, indicating a positive outcome.
  • There is a contention regarding the loss of the coordinate u in the transformation process, with one participant asserting that it is essential to retain it for proper calculations.
  • Another participant defends their approach, arguing that while their method may require more work, it is not incorrect and that u can be scaled back later.
  • Further suggestions are made to use alternative transformations that maintain the relationship between the original and transformed coordinates.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriateness of the transformations used and whether the coordinate u is adequately represented in the proposed methods. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing approaches being presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants highlight the complexity of the transformations and the need to reverse certain steps later in the calculations. There is also an emphasis on the importance of maintaining the coordinate u throughout the process.

Rick16
Messages
158
Reaction score
46
TL;DR
given are x(u, v, w), y(u, v, w), z(u, v, w), and I want to find u(x, y, z), v(x, y, z), w(x, y, z)
Is there a systematic way to do it? In particular, I have the coordinates ##x=au \sin v \cos w##, ##y=bu\sin v\sin w##, ##z=cu\cos v##, where a, b, c are constants, and I want to find ##u(x,y,z)##, ##v(x,y,z)##, ##w(x,y,z)##. I could solve the three equations for u, v, and w and then try to insert the resulting equations into each other, and with a lot of fumbling around I may get the solutions that I want. But this does not seem to be the most rational approach.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Gavran
Physics news on Phys.org
I would first get rid of the constants and introduce ##x'={(au)}^{-1}x\, , \,y'={(bu)}^{-1}y\, , \,z'={(cu)}^{-1}z## and then operate with them like the usual polar coordinates, e.g. ##x'^2+y'^2=\sin^2(v)## etc.
 
Thank you very much. I was able to solve it quickly with these substitutions.
 
fresh_42 said:
I would first get rid of the constants and introduce ##x'={(au)}^{-1}x\, , \,y'={(bu)}^{-1}y\, , \,z'={(cu)}^{-1}z## and then operate with them like the usual polar coordinates, e.g. ##x'^2+y'^2=\sin^2(v)## etc.
You lost the coordinate ## u ## and you have to operate with the usual spherical coordinates.
 
Gavran said:
You lost the coordinate ## u ## and you have to operate with the usual spherical coordinates.
I did not.
\begin{align*}
x'^2+y'^2&=(au)^{-2}x^2+(bu)^{-2}y^2\\
&=(au)^{-2}(au \sin v \cos w)^2+(bu)^{-2}(bu\sin v\sin w)^2\\
&=\sin^2 v\left(\cos ^2w+\sin^2w\right)\\
&=\sin^2 v
\end{align*}
And, yes, my substitutions make a sphere out of the ellipsoid. This has to be reversed at the end of the calculations.
 
fresh_42 said:
I did not.
\begin{align*}
x'^2+y'^2&=(au)^{-2}x^2+(bu)^{-2}y^2\\
&=(au)^{-2}(au \sin v \cos w)^2+(bu)^{-2}(bu\sin v\sin w)^2\\
&=\sin^2 v\left(\cos ^2w+\sin^2w\right)\\
&=\sin^2 v
\end{align*}
And, yes, my substitutions make a sphere out of the ellipsoid. This has to be reversed at the end of the calculations.
I mean that your transformation from xyz-Cartesian coordinate system to x’y’z’-Cartesian coordinate system is wrong because in the equations you got the spherical coordinate ## u ## can not be seen.
“get rid of the constants”, what you said and what is correct, does not mean to get rid of the constants and the coordinate ## u ##.
 
Gavran said:
I mean that your transformation from xyz-Cartesian coordinate system to x’y’z’-Cartesian coordinate system is wrong because in the equations you got the spherical coordinate ## u ## can not be seen.
“get rid of the constants”, what you said and what is correct, does not mean to get rid of the constants and the coordinate ## u ##.
This is not wrong. It might only be more work to do. I showed a path, not a solution. ##u## is a radius and scaling it back again is no problem.
 
fresh_42 said:
This is not wrong. It might only be more work to do.
So it is better to use the next transformations: ## x'=a^{-1}x ##, ## y'=b^{-1}y ## and ## z'=c^{-1}z ##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
5K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
13K