How to find mass of a meterstick from torque

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZurasE
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mass Torque
AI Thread Summary
To determine the mass of a meter stick using torque, the stick should be hung from a point that is not its center of mass. By applying known weights on either end and balancing the system, the difference in weights can be used to calculate the mass. The torque exerted by each weight must be analyzed, as it is the product of the force and the distance from the pivot point. A common mistake is to assume that the difference in weights directly correlates to the mass distribution of the meter stick without considering their respective distances from the pivot. Understanding and applying the correct torque principles is essential for accurately finding the mass of the meter stick.
ZurasE
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Here is my assignment:
For this inquiry, you will be using your meter stick, some string, some weights of known mass, and the spring force gauge from your kits. Here's the question to answer:

  • what is the mass of the meter stick?
You can't measure the mass directly! That's forbidden, but you can use what you know about torques to answer the question.

Some hints:

  • hang the meter stick from some point that is not the center.
  • use the spring force gauge to impart a torque
In a document called "meter stick mass", clearly explain your method and include a picture of your experimental setup. After you have done the experiment, compare your mass gained by the torque method to the actual mass of the meter stick.

Homework Equations


So I know I am supposed to use torque to figure this out.
Torque=distance from center of mass times force
Also
F=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


So if I were to hang the meter stick at the 25 cm mark, that would make the mass of the ruler three times heavier on one side than the other. So if I were to hang a weight on one end, and a weight on the other, I could take the difference, and that would be the difference in the weights of the two parts of the meterstick.
Example:
Lets say I hung a weight of four on the long end, and it took a weight of six on the short end to balance. I subtract these and get 2. So if the difference is two in the weights of the weights that I hung, wouldn't that be the difference in the weights of the two sections of the meterstick? So in this case it would be 3 N on the long end and 1N on the short end. Is that right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your statement about torque is not correct. The torque generated by a force about an axis is the force multiplied by the distance from the line of action of the force to the axis. The axis need not be the mass centre.
ZurasE said:
So if I were to hang the meter stick at the 25 cm mark, that would make the mass of the ruler three times heavier on one side than the other. So if I hung a weight of 4 N on one end, I would need to pull with 12 N on the short end in order to balance the torques. But how am I supposed to use this to find the mass?
Will a 4N mass on the long arm get the system to balance? Analyse the moments about the pivot.
 
haruspex said:
Your statement about torque is not correct. The torque generated by a force about an axis is the force multiplied by the distance from the line of action of the force to the axis. The axis need not be the mass centre.

Will a 4N mass on the long arm get the system to balance? Analyse the moments about the pivot.
I changed it, could you look over it again?
 
ZurasE said:
Lets say I hung a weight of four on the long end, and it took a weight of six on the short end to balance. I subtract these and get 2. So if the difference is two in the weights of the weights that I hung, wouldn't that be the difference in the weights of the two sections of the meterstick? So in this case it would be 3 N on the long end and 1N on the short end. Is that right?
No. Think about torques. The two weights are at different distances from the pivot. What torque does each exert about the pivot?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top