How to find the antiderivative of cot(x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter sonofjohn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Antiderivative
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding the antiderivative of cot(x) and the application of differentiation rules, particularly the chain rule and product rule. Participants clarify the correct use of these rules while solving problems related to derivatives and integrals. Key points include the correct formulation of the second derivative of f^2(x) and the proper approach to solving separable differential equations, specifically relating to half-life calculations. The final consensus emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying principles of calculus to avoid common mistakes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic calculus concepts, including derivatives and integrals.
  • Familiarity with the chain rule and product rule in differentiation.
  • Knowledge of exponential functions and their properties.
  • Concept of half-life in the context of exponential decay.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the chain rule in differentiation with examples.
  • Learn about the product rule and its implications in calculus.
  • Explore the concept of separable differential equations and their solutions.
  • Review the principles of exponential decay and half-life calculations in detail.
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in calculus, particularly those focusing on differentiation and integration techniques, as well as anyone studying exponential functions and their applications in real-world scenarios.

sonofjohn
Messages
76
Reaction score
0
IM000001.jpg


5) As you can see ln(sin(1)) +1/ln.5 does not yield one of the above answers. Can someone tell me where I went wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org


I think you made a mistake when finding C.
C should be equal to 1-ln(.5) not 1/ln(.5).
The answer should be the last one (E).
 


Thanks for the help, didn't see that.
 


Does anyone have an idea as to how to figure 6 out? I don't believe I have ever tried one of those problems.
 


You should try finding out what is the second derivative of [f^2(x)].
When you're done, you just plug in the number 3 and it is easy to find out what's the answer.
 


isn't the second derivative of f^2x = 2?
 


No, consider [f^2(x)]=[f(x)]^2
you know that (u^m)'=m (u^(m-1)) u' right?
So it's the same thing for u=f(x) and m=2.

Can you try it and see what you get when you do it twice?
 


sonofjohn said:
isn't the second derivative of f^2x = 2?

Certainly not. Let f(x) = x^3, then f^{2}(x) = x^6. Still think your rule works?
 


I can't see how to take the second derivative of f^2(x). Am I supposed to use the previous f(3) = 2 and ect for this? I have never actually learned how.
 
  • #10


Use the chain rule, if I told you to differentiate [sin(x)]^2 what would you do?
 
  • #11


so we start with

f(x)^2
2f(x)
and then what?
 
  • #12


No, that's not it. Try again :) You are saying if we define f(x) = sin(x) then f^(2)(x) = sin^2(x) and you are saying derivative of f^(2)(x) is 2*sin(x)? You know that's not true...
 
  • #13


could I possibly multiply them and get f(2x^2)?
 
  • #14


[f(x)^2]'= 2f(x)*f '(x)
you're not using the chain rule correctly. Don't forget the f '(x) at the end :)

Now can you find out what is [2f(x)*f '(x)] ' using the product rule?
 
  • #15


sonofjohn said:
could I possibly multiply them and get f(2x^2)?

Where are you getting 2x^2 from? Think of f^2(x) as f(x)*f(x). What's the derivative of that. That uses the product rule instead of the chain rule, if you have trouble remembering that one.
 
  • #16


2f'(x) + f"(x)2f(x) would that be it and then just number plug?
 
  • #17


No! Why is the first term 2f'(x)?
 
  • #18


it should be 2f'(x)f'(x) + f"(x)2f(x) = 42. I messed up the chain rule again :(
 
Last edited:
  • #19


Now 7 is another problem I have yet to face. I see that t is in seconds so I think I should multiply t by 60 to convert it to minutes. Should I then plug 1 in for y and take the derivative?
 
  • #20


sonofjohn said:
it should be 2f'(x)f'(x) + f"(x)2f(x) = 42. I messed up the chain rule again :(

Actually that's the product rule.

sonofjohn said:
Now 7 is another problem I have yet to face. I see that t is in seconds so I think I should multiply t by 60 to convert it to minutes. Should I then plug 1 in for y and take the derivative?

If \frac{dy}{dt} = ky Then y = ? Solve this separable DE.
 
  • #21


Ok so using the seperable differentiation (not what it's called) I come out with dy/y = (dt)k

where do I go from there?
 
  • #22


I would integrate it.
 
  • #23


Integrating yields y = dk ?
 
  • #24


No. The integral of dy/y is not equal to y and the integral of (k)(dt) is not equal to dk. You may want to review your integrals.
 
  • #25


Yes I do. I need to review all of Calc 1 really. Is the integration lny = t(dk/dt)
 
  • #26


Much closer but not quite. Your equation should read: ln(y) = kt.
 
  • #27


yes, because k is a constant! Now if I plug y in I get ln1/t but t is in seconds so it would be ln1/60 right? But ln1 is zero and that ruins it all.
 
  • #28


Write your equation in terms of y and then solve.

Edit: try this. We know y = e^kt. If we let y designate the initial amount of the isotope then y = e^k. Now based on the information we may express the half life as: y/2 = e^60k or y = 2e^60k. Equate the two and solve.
 
  • #29


I see where the 60 seconds is coming from in the e^60k but not where the y/2 comes from on the other side of the equation.
 
  • #30


Half-life. Half of the amount of the initial isotope has decayed at t = 60, hence, y/2.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K