How to find the coefficients of this expansion?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on finding coefficients for the solution of a differential equation represented as $$u = B + \sum_{n=1} C_{n }e^{-\lambda_{n}² q² t} J_{0}(\lambda_{n}r)$$. The challenge arises from determining the appropriate orthogonality conditions for the Bessel function $$J_{0}$$, particularly when $$\lambda_{q}a$$ is not a zero of $$J_{0}$$ but rather a zero of its derivative. The orthogonality condition is confirmed to be satisfied, as referenced from Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" (3rd Edition), indicating that alternative expansions using $$\sqrt{\rho} J_\nu (y_{\nu n}\rho / a)$$ are also valid.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of differential equations and their solutions.
  • Familiarity with Bessel functions, specifically $$J_{0}$$ and $$J_{\nu}$$.
  • Knowledge of orthogonality conditions in function spaces.
  • Reference to Jackson's "Classical Electrodynamics" for context on Bessel function properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Bessel functions, focusing on their orthogonality and zeros.
  • Learn about the application of differential equations in physical contexts, particularly in electrodynamics.
  • Explore alternative series expansions involving Bessel functions and their implications.
  • Investigate the derivation and application of orthogonality conditions in mathematical physics.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with differential equations and Bessel functions, particularly in the fields of electrodynamics and applied mathematics.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Homework Statement
z.
Relevant Equations
\,
I have solved a differential equation whose solutions is $$u = B + \sum_{n=1} C_{n }e^{-\lambda_{n}² q² t} J_{0}(\lambda_{n}r)$$

Where ##(\lambda_{n}r)## is such that ##J_{0}'(\lambda_{n}a) = 0##. So i should now try to satisfy the condition that, at t=0, u = ##f(r)##.

The problem is that i don't know what is the orthogonality here. If ##\lambda_{n}## were such that ##J_{0}(\lambda_{n}a)=0##, i would use the normal orthogonaltiy generally used, namely ##\int_{0}^{a} r J_{0}(\lambda_{n}r)J_{0}(\lambda_{q}r)##

But this doesn't work here, since ##\lambda_{q}a## is not a zero of J0, but it is a zero in fact of its derivative.

Not just it, what orthogornality i would use to find the B?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Twigg
Physics news on Phys.org
Believe it or not, orthogonality, exactly the way you wrote it, is already guaranteed. My source is Jackson Classical Electrodynamics 3rd Edition, bottom of page 115:

But it will be noted that an alternative expansion is possible in a series of functions ##\sqrt{\rho} J_\nu (y_{\nu n}\rho / a)## where ##y_{\nu n}## is the ##n##th root of the equation ##[dJ_\nu(x)]/dx = 0##. The reason is that, in proving the orthogonality of functions, all that is demanded is that thte quantity ##[\rho J_\nu (k\rho) (d/d\rho) J_\nu (k' \rho) - \rho J_\nu (k' \rho) (d/d\rho) J_\nu (k\rho)]## vanish at the endpoints ##\rho = 0## and ##\rho = a##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K