How to find the equation for velocity of a mass on a spring?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves using conservation of energy to derive the equation for the velocity of a mass at the equilibrium position of a vertical spring system. The original poster presents an equation related to the velocity and discusses the types of energy involved in the system.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between gravitational potential energy and the position of the mass on the spring, questioning the definitions of amplitude and equilibrium stretch. There are discussions about the initial and final positions chosen for energy calculations and the implications of those choices on the potential energy terms.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, questioning assumptions about the definitions of variables and the setup of the energy equations. Some guidance has been offered regarding the treatment of gravitational potential energy and the stretch of the spring at equilibrium, but no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There are ongoing discussions about the definitions of potential energy reference points and the implications of choosing different positions for zero potential energy. The original poster's approach to the problem is being critically examined, particularly regarding the relationship between amplitude and the stretch of the spring at equilibrium.

Danya314
Messages
15
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The problem is to use conservation of energy to determine the equation for the velocity at the equilibrium position of an oscillating mass on a vertical spring. The question says to use three types of energy. The question gives the equation, the problem is to solve for it. The equation is v=A(k/m)^.5

Homework Equations


Uelastic+Ugravitational+Ukinetic=Uelastic+Ugravitational+Ukinetic

The Attempt at a Solution


The initial position I chose was at the bottom of the mass's motion and the final at equilibrium, so inital kinetic and final elastic and gravitational are zero.

mgh+.5kx^2=.5mv^2
since h and x are the amplitude,
mgA+.5kA^2=.5v^2
simplifying gives,
2gA+(k/m)A^2=v^2
How do I get rid of the gravity term?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Danya314 said:

The Attempt at a Solution


The initial position I chose was at the bottom of the mass's motion and the final at equilibrium, so inital kinetic and final elastic and gravitational are zero.

mgh+.5kx^2=.5mv^2
since h and x are the amplitude,
mgA+.5kA^2=.5v^2

If you are taking gravitational PE to be zero at the equilibrium position, then what should be the sign of the gravitational PE at the bottom of the motion?

x represents the amount that the spring is stretched from the unstretched length. If the mass hangs at rest at the equilibrium position, then the spring is stretched. So, x is not equal to zero at the equilibrium position. Also, x is not equal to A at the bottom of the motion.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Danya314
Thanks for the help. But why wouldn't x be amplitude at the bottom?
 
The spring already has some stretch at the equilibrium position. Let this stretch be xe.

Then, at the bottom the spring will be stretched by x = xe + A.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Danya314
Would gravitational potential energy still be zero if I define xe to be 0?
 
Danya314 said:
Would gravitational potential energy still be zero if I define xe to be 0?

That depends. Are you redefining the axis so that Xe is the new zero?
 
The formula PE = 1/2 k x2 for the spring assumes that x is the amount of stretch of the spring. Since the spring is stretched at the equilibrium position, you cannot let xe = 0. You should be able to determine xe in terms of m, g, and k. (Think about the mass hanging at rest at the equilibrium position.)

For the gravitational PE you can use PE = mgy and you can choose y = 0 anywhere you want. So, you can choose y = 0 at the equilibrium position if you want. Then PE for gravity = 0 at the equilibrium position.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Danya314 and AlephNumbers
I have it now. Thank you very much.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
867
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K