How to Find Unit Tangential Vectors on a Surface?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter caseyjay
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Surface Vector
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around finding unit tangential vectors on the surface defined by the equation x² + 3y² + 2z² = 9 at the specific point (-1, 0, 9). Participants explore methods to derive these vectors, focusing on the relationship between the normal vector, the tangent plane, and the conditions for unit magnitude.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Casey initiates the discussion by stating the problem and expressing difficulty in finding unit tangential vectors after determining the normal vector and the equation of the tangent plane.
  • Some participants suggest that all tangential vectors must lie within the tangent plane and provide a position vector formulation that incorporates parameters x and y.
  • There is a proposal to express x and y in terms of trigonometric functions (x = cos(θ), y = sin(θ)) to simplify the parameterization of the vectors.
  • Casey questions the derivation of the position vector in the tangent plane, seeking clarification on the underlying formula or reasoning.
  • Another participant identifies specific tangential vectors at given points and discusses the requirement that the dot product of the normal vector and the tangential vector should equal zero, raising concerns about discrepancies in their calculations.
  • In a later post, Casey claims to have found a solution, detailing the process of deriving the tangent plane and the unit tangential vector, while acknowledging earlier mistakes.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the need to find tangential vectors within the tangent plane, but there are differing approaches and some unresolved questions regarding the calculations and conditions for unit vectors. The discussion does not reach a consensus on the best method or the correctness of all proposed solutions.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the derivation of the position vector and the conditions for unit tangential vectors, indicating potential gaps in understanding or assumptions that may not be fully articulated.

caseyjay
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

If I have a surface x2+3y2+2z2=9, how am I suppose to find all the unit magnitude vectors that are tangential to the surface at point (-1,0,9)?

So far, I am able to find the normal vector 2xi+6yj+4zk and the equation of the plane at (-1,0,9) will therefore be 2x+6y+4z=6. However, then I am stuck and I do not know how can I find the unit magnitude vectors that are tangential to the surface.

Can someone please help me?

Thanks in advance.

Casey.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You are almost finished. All tangential vectors must lie in that tangent plane, of course. The "position vector" of a point in that plane can be written \vec{r}= (x+ 1)\vec{i}+ y\vec{j}+ (z-9)\vec{k} and must satisfy 2(x+1)+ 6y+ 4(z- 9)= 0
You can write, then, z- 9= (1/2)(x+1)+ (3/2)y so the vector equation becomes \vec{r(x,y)}= (x+1)\vec{i}+ y\vec{j}+ (1/2)(x+ 3y+ 1)\vec{k}. Divide that by its length to get a unit vector. Of course, you will have x and y in that because you have a two parameter set of vectors in the tangent plane. You could use the "unit" condition (x+1)^2+ y^2+ (1/4)(x+ 3y+1)= 1 to reduce to one parameter.


While wr
 
HallsofIvy said:
You are almost finished. All tangential vectors must lie in that tangent plane, of course. The "position vector" of a point in that plane can be written \vec{r}= (x+ 1)\vec{i}+ y\vec{j}+ (z-9)\vec{k} and must satisfy 2(x+1)+ 6y+ 4(z- 9)= 0
You can write, then, z- 9= (1/2)(x+1)+ (3/2)y so the vector equation becomes \vec{r(x,y)}= (x+1)\vec{i}+ y\vec{j}+ (1/2)(x+ 3y+ 1)\vec{k}. Divide that by its length to get a unit vector. Of course, you will have x and y in that because you have a two parameter set of vectors in the tangent plane. You could use the "unit" condition (x+1)^2+ y^2+ (1/4)(x+ 3y+1)= 1 to reduce to one parameter.


While wr

Hi HallsofIvy, thanks for your help. At the end of your message, you wrote "While wr". Is there something you would like to continue to explain to me?
 
Actually, no. I started to say "while writing that", it had occurred to m that it would be better to work with the angle the vector makes as parameter but then I figured I had better think about it more! If you let x= cos(\theta) and y= sin(\theta), we can use z= (1/2)(x+1)+ (3/2)y so write z as a function of \theta but then we have the same problem: taking r in the xy-plane equal to 1 doesn't make this a unit vector!
 
HallsofIvy said:
Actually, no. I started to say "while writing that", it had occurred to m that it would be better to work with the angle the vector makes as parameter but then I figured I had better think about it more! If you let x= cos(\theta) and y= sin(\theta), we can use z= (1/2)(x+1)+ (3/2)y so write z as a function of \theta but then we have the same problem: taking r in the xy-plane equal to 1 doesn't make this a unit vector!

Oh I see. Speaking of that, how do you derive that the position vector of a point in that plane can be written as:

<br /> \vec{r}= (x+ 1)\vec{i}+ y\vec{j}+ (z-9)\vec{k}<br />

Is there a formula or derivation that I am missing here?
 
Hi HallsofIvy,

I figure out how you derive \vec{r}= (x+ 1)\vec{i}+ y\vec{j}+ (z-9)\vec{k} as the tangential vectors. Since x, y, and z must satisfy 2(x+1)+ 6y+ 4(z- 9)= 0, two possibilities of the tangent vectors are \vec{r}= \vec{i}+ 3\vec{j}-5\vec{k} at (0,3,4) and \vec{r}= 3\vec{i}+ 5\vec{j}-9\vec{k} at (2,5,0).

Since if I substitute (0,3,4) and (2,5,0) separately into 2(x+1)+ 6y+ 4(z- 9), I will obtain 0, hence I presume I am right so far. However, I also remember that the scalar product of the normal vector and the tangent vector should be equal to zero since the angle between them is 90 degrees. But if I perform

(\vec{i}+ 3\vec{j}-5\vec{k})*(-2\vec{i}+ 0\vec{j}+36\vec{k})

and

(3\vec{i}+ 5\vec{j}-9\vec{k})*(-2\vec{i}+ 0\vec{j}+36\vec{k})

I won't get 0 as a result.

Why is it so?

NB: * is dot product.
 
Hi all,

I think I have solved the problem and thanks for all your help. I have made some fundamental mistakes earlier and hence I am unable to solve it correctly. The solution is as follows:

Surface: x2+3y2+2z2=9

Let f(x,y,z)=x2+3y2+2z2

Therefore \nablaf(x,y,z)=2x\vec{i}+6y\vec{j}+4z\vec{k}.

At (-1,0,2), f(x,y,z)=-2\vec{i}+8\vec{k}. It follows that the equation of the tangent plane is -2(x+1)+8(z-2)=0 and therefore -2x+8z=18.

The tangential vectors on the tangent plane is given by [since it crosses (-1,0,2)]:
(x+1)\vec{i}+y\vec{j}+(z-2)\vec{k}

The unit tangential vector is by dividing the tangential vector with its magnitude.

Hope the above helps and once again thank you to all who have helped in solving this.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K