How to Handle Gradient and Laplacian Commutators in Quantum Field Theory?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rick89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutator
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around handling commutators involving gradient and Laplacian operators in the context of quantum field theory, specifically referencing the text by Peskin and Schroeder. Participants are attempting to understand the manipulation of these operators within commutators as presented in the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are exploring various methods to handle the commutators, including integration by parts and the use of identities related to operator manipulation. Questions arise regarding the treatment of operators and the implications of their actions on adjacent operators.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered suggestions for approaches, such as using ladder operators and specific identities to simplify the calculations. However, there remains a lack of clarity on the fundamental handling of the commutators, with multiple interpretations being explored without a definitive consensus.

Contextual Notes

There is an indication of confusion regarding the proper techniques for calculating commutators involving differential operators, as well as the need for explicit clarification on the participants' understanding of the problem setup.

Rick89
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
Hi, could someone give me a hand with the two long commutators on page 25 of Peskin and Schroeder? I'm not sure how to deal with the gradient in the first and the laplacian in the second. Thanx a lot
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Rick89 said:
Hi, could someone give me a hand with the two long commutators on page 25 of Peskin and Schroeder? I'm not sure how to deal with the gradient in the first and the laplacian in the second.

Try integration by parts in the first one, and see how far you can get... :-)
 
Last edited:
sorry, I'm not sure I see what u mean. I understand how to pass from the first to the second expression of the Hamiltonian used by "integrating by parts" the grad term. But my problem is how to handle the commutators. Any more suggestion? I still can't go on, I'm probably missing something easy.
Thanx
 
Rick89 said:
sorry, I'm not sure I see what u mean. I understand how to pass from the first to the second expression of the Hamiltonian used by "integrating by parts" the grad term. But my problem is how to handle the commutators.

Hmmm. I'm not sure what you mean by "handle" the commutators. You can
just move them inside the integral. E.g.,

[tex] \left[A \,,\, \int\!\! B \right] ~\to~ \int [A,B][/tex]

(If that wasn't your problem, you need to be more explicit...)
 
sorry, that was not what I meant. I meant: what is the trick to calculate commutators involving gradient and laplacian operators (for example [pi,del squared phi])? Do I treat them as operators? How do I deal with the fact that they only act on the operator immediately to the right? Is this the right way of doing these things or do I have to integrate something? Thanx
 
I think the easiest method may be to use the expressions in terms of ladder operators (2.27) and (2.28) and the commutators in (2.32).

Alternatively, if you want to do the calculation in the position basis as Peskin & Schroeder do, you'll find the identity [itex][A,BC]=[A,B]C+B[A,C][/itex] very useful. For example,

[tex][\phi(\textbf{x},t),(\mathbf{\nabla}\phi(\textbf{x}',t))^2]= [\phi(\textbf{x},t),\mathbf{\nabla}\phi(\textbf{x}',t)]\cdot\mathbf{\nabla}\phi(\textbf{x}',t)+\mathbf{\nabla}\phi(\textbf{x}',t)\cdot[\phi(\textbf{x},t),\mathbf{\nabla}\phi(\textbf{x}',t)] \end{aligned}[/tex]

Where [itex][\phi(\textbf{x},t),\mathbf{\nabla}\phi(\textbf{x}',t)][/itex] can be easily calculated using (2.27).
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K