Calculating Boosted Relativistic Normalization in Quantum Field Theory

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of boosted relativistic normalization in quantum field theory, specifically addressing the properties of delta functions under Lorentz transformations and the implications for on-shell momenta. The scope includes theoretical aspects of quantum field theory and mathematical reasoning related to Lorentz invariance.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references a formula from Peskin and Schroeder regarding the normalization of delta functions under boosts in the z direction.
  • Another participant explains that the measure ##\mathrm{d}^3 p/E## is invariant for on-shell momenta, which leads to the conclusion that the distribution ##E_p \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}-\vec{q})## is a Lorentz scalar.
  • A request is made to prove the invariance of the delta function directly without assuming the invariant measure.
  • Further elaboration is provided on the invariance of ##\delta^{(3)}(\vec{p})## under rotations and the need for the assumption of on-shell four-momenta for boosts. A detailed derivation involving the Jacobian of the transformation is presented, leading to the conclusion that ##E' \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}')=E \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p})##, indicating that this transforms as a scalar field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants engage in a technical discussion with some agreement on the properties of delta functions and their transformation under Lorentz boosts. However, there is no explicit consensus on the necessity of the invariant measure or the direct proof requested, indicating that multiple views may exist.

Contextual Notes

The discussion involves assumptions about on-shell conditions and the mathematical properties of delta functions, which may not be universally accepted or fully resolved.

abhinavabhatt
Messages
6
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
how to compute the Lorentz transformation(Boost along any direction) of Dirac Delta function?
In Quantum field theory by Peskin Schroeder for relativistic normalization
δ(p'-q')=δ(p-q) dp'3/dp3

where the boost is in z direction. How did they compute it?
 

Attachments

  • qft.PNG
    qft.PNG
    10.4 KB · Views: 352
Physics news on Phys.org
Here, PS consider on-shell momenta, i.e., momenta fulfilling the on-shell condition ##p^2=m^2## or ##E=\sqrt{\vec{p}^2+m^2}##. For these the measure ##\mathrm{d}^3 p/E## is invariant (Lorentz scalar). This implies that the distribution ##E_p \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}-\vec{q})## is a Lorentz scalar.
 
Thanks a lot for your reply.I understand this .Can you tell me how prove it directly using the delta function properties without presuming the invariant measure ?
 
It's clear that it's enough to prove it for ##\delta^{(3)}(\vec{p})##. This distribution is for sure invariant under rotations. For boosts you need the assumption that we talk about four-momenta that are onshell, i.e., ##p^0=\sqrt{\vec{p}^2+m^2}##. Then a Lorentz boost with velocity ##\vec{v}## reads
$$\begin {pmatrix} p^{\prime 0} \\ \vec{p}' \end{pmatrix} = \begin{pmatrix} \gamma (p^0-\vec{v} \cdot \vec{p}) \\ \vec{p}+\hat{v} (\gamma-1) (\hat{v} \cdot \vec{p})-\gamma p^0 \vec{v} \end{pmatrix}.$$
From this we get for the Jacobi matrix of the transformation
$$\frac{\partial p_j'}{\partial p_k} = \delta_{jk} + \hat{v}_j \hat{v}_k (\gamma-1)-\gamma p_k/p^0 v_j.$$
Now we have to calculate the determinant of this matrix,
$$J=\mathrm{det} \frac{\partial p_j'}{\partial p_k} = \frac{\gamma (p_0-\vec{p} \cdot \vec{v})}{p_0} =\frac{p_0'}{p_0}.$$
Now from the transformation of the ##\delta## distribution you get
$$\delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}')=\frac{1}{J} \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p})=\frac{p_0}{p_0'} \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p})$$
or
$$p_0' \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}')=p_0 \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}).$$
Here ##p_0=E=\sqrt{\vec{p}^2+m^2}## and ##p_0'=E'=\sqrt{\vec{p}{\prime 2}+m^2}## and thus, on the mass shell
$$E' \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}')=E \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p}),$$
i.e., ##E \delta^{(3)}(\vec{p})## transforms as a scalar field under Lorentz transformations.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: abhinavabhatt
Thanks a lot for the answer.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: vanhees71

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K