How to integrate a sum of two entropy differentials?

  • Context: Chemistry 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zenterix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Entropy
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the integration of entropy differentials in a thermodynamic context, specifically concerning the heat exchange between two blocks at different temperatures. Participants explore various approaches to calculating the total entropy change and the implications of reversible versus irreversible processes.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes a method to calculate the total entropy change using the relationship between heat differentials and temperatures, questioning the correctness of integrating the expression involving initial temperatures.
  • Another participant emphasizes that the temperatures of the blocks are not constant and suggests that the limits of integration need to be reconsidered.
  • There is a discussion about the assumption of reversible heat exchange, with participants expressing uncertainty about the implications of this assumption on the calculations.
  • Participants note that the expression involving the initial temperatures is incorrect and clarify that the integration should consider varying temperatures during the process.
  • One participant highlights the challenge of understanding these concepts despite their apparent simplicity, reflecting on the nature of entropy as a state function.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the integration must account for varying temperatures and that the process should be considered reversible for the entropy calculations. However, there remains uncertainty regarding the implications of these assumptions and the correctness of specific expressions.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the assumption of reversibility and the need for clarity on the definitions of temperatures used in the calculations. The discussion does not resolve the correct approach to integrating the entropy differentials.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be useful for students and professionals interested in thermodynamics, particularly those exploring the concepts of entropy, heat exchange, and the implications of reversible versus irreversible processes.

zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
Two blocks of the same metal are of the same size but are at different temperatures ##T_1## and ##T_2##. These blocks of metal are brought together and allowed to come to the same temperature.
Relevant Equations
Show that the entropy change is given by

$$\Delta S=C_P\ln{\left [ \frac{(T_1+T_2)^2}{4T_1T_2} \right ]}$$

if ##C_P## is constant.
Here is a way to solve the problem.

Since ##dq_1=-dq_2## then

$$\int_{T_1}^T C_PdT=-\int_{T_2}^T C_PdT\tag{1}$$

$$\implies T=\frac{T_1+T_2}{2}\tag{2}$$

$$dq_1=C_PdT\tag{3}$$

$$dS_1=\frac{dq_1}{T}=\frac{C_P}{T}dT\tag{4}$$

$$\Delta S_1=\int_{T_1}^T\frac{C_P}{T}dT=C_P\ln{\frac{T}{T_1}}\tag{5}$$

$$dq_2=C_PdT\tag{6}$$

$$dS_2=\frac{dq_2}{T}=\frac{C_P}{T}dT\tag{7}$$

$$\Delta S_1=\int_{T_2}^T\frac{C_P}{T}dT=C_P\ln{\frac{T}{T_2}}\tag{8}$$

$$\Delta S_{sys}=\Delta S_1+\Delta S_2=C_P\ln{\frac{T^2}{T_1T_2}}=C_P\ln{\frac{(T_1+T_2)^2}{4T_1T_2}}\tag{9}$$

My question is about solving it a different way, if possible.

Can we write

$$dS_{sys}=dS_1+dS_2=\frac{dq_1}{T_1}+\frac{dq_2}{T_2}\tag{10}$$

$$=\frac{dq_1}{T_1}-\frac{dq_1}{T_2}\tag{11}$$

is this expression correct?

I am really not sure. If it is, I am not sure what it means to integrate the right-hand side. In particular, what would the limits of integration be?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zenterix said:
Can we write

$$dS_{sys}=dS_1+dS_2=\frac{dq_1}{T_1}+\frac{dq_2}{T_2}\tag{10}$$

$$=\frac{dq_1}{T_1}-\frac{dq_1}{T_2}\tag{11}$$

is this expression correct?

I am really not sure. If it is, I am not sure what it means to integrate the right-hand side. In particular, what would the limits of integration be?
The 2 blocks don't have constant temperatures.
T1 and T2 are only their starting temperatures.
Try again. Then you should see what the limits of integration have to be.
 
Philip Koeck said:
The 2 blocks don't have constant temperatures.
T1 and T2 are only their starting temperatures.
Try again. Then you should see what the limits of integration have to be.
I am aware that the temperatures aren't constant.

Indeed, the expression ##\frac{dq_1}{T_1}-\frac{dq_1}{T_2}## isn't correct because I defined ##T_1## and ##T_2## as constant initial temperatures.

In the correct solution I showed, when I write ##\int_{T_1}^T\frac{C_P}{T}dT##, the ##T##, as far as I understand, is actually the external temperature. That is, it is the temperature of the external "reservoir" for a reversible process.

Am I correct to say that implicit in this problem is the assumption that the heat exchange happens reversibly?

I am really not sure. The fact that the calculated entropy change is positive means this entire process can occur spontaneously.

After all, the differential ##dS=\frac{dq}{T}## is only true for reversible processes.

If I write ##\frac{dq_1}{t_1}-\frac{dq_1}{t_2}## then ##t_1## and ##t_2## denote external temperatures. Would this be correct?

I find it incredible how difficult these concepts are even though they look so simple.
 
zenterix said:
I am aware that the temperatures aren't constant.

Indeed, the expression ##\frac{dq_1}{T_1}-\frac{dq_1}{T_2}## isn't correct because I defined ##T_1## and ##T_2## as constant initial temperatures.

In the correct solution I showed, when I write ##\int_{T_1}^T\frac{C_P}{T}dT##, the ##T##, as far as I understand, is actually the external temperature. That is, it is the temperature of the external "reservoir" for a reversible process.

Am I correct to say that implicit in this problem is the assumption that the heat exchange happens reversibly?

I am really not sure. The fact that the calculated entropy change is positive means this entire process can occur spontaneously.

After all, the differential ##dS=\frac{dq}{T}## is only true for reversible processes.

If I write ##\frac{dq_1}{t_1}-\frac{dq_1}{t_2}## then ##t_1## and ##t_2## denote external temperatures. Would this be correct?

I find it incredible how difficult these concepts are even though they look so simple.
Yes, you do have to consider a reversible process to calculate ΔS.
You could imagine an environment that has all the temperatures between T1 and T2 so that the temperature change can occur reversibly, but that just means that you only need to think of the temperatures of the two blocks anyway.
Your equations 10 and 11 are correct if T1 stands for the varying temperature of block 1 and T2 for the varying temperature of block 2. When you integrate you just use the starting and final temperatures of each block as limits, so you need two separate integrals.
I would say you end up with the same as the first solution you give.
 
zenterix said:
Am I correct to say that implicit in this problem is the assumption that the heat exchange happens reversibly?

I am really not sure. The fact that the calculated entropy change is positive means this entire process can occur spontaneously.

After all, the differential ##dS=\frac{dq}{T}## is only true for reversible processes.

If I write ##\frac{dq_1}{t_1}-\frac{dq_1}{t_2}## then ##t_1## and ##t_2## denote external temperatures. Would this be correct?

I find it incredible how difficult these concepts are even though they look so simple.
I agree it's strange.

You need an (imagined) reversible process to calculate the entropy change for each block, but in the end you find that the total entropy change is positive, showing that the process i irreversible.

This only makes sense because entropy is a state function.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K