The notation
[tex]
\int_\Omega X(\omega}) \, \mathcal{P}(dw)[/tex]
is used in probability to indicate the expectation of the random variable [tex]X[/tex]
with respect tot the probability measure (distribution) [tex]\mathcal{P}[/tex] over the probability space [tex]\Omega[/tex].
If [tex]\Lambda[/tex] is any measurable set, then
[tex]
\int_\Lambda X(\omega) \, \mathcal{P}(dw) = E[X \cdot 1_{\Lambda}][/tex]
If the probability space is the real line with measure [tex]\mu[/tex], then
[tex]
\int_\Lambda X(\omega) \, \mathcal{P}(dw) = \int_\Lambda f(x) \, \mu(dx)[/tex]
is the Lebesgue-Stieltjes integral of [tex]f[/tex] with respect to the
probability measure [tex]\mu[/tex].
In more traditional form, if [tex]F[/tex] is the distribution function of [tex]\mu[/tex], and [tex]\Lambda[/tex] is an interval [tex](a,b)[/tex], then
[tex]
\int_\Lambda X(\omega) \, \mathcal{P}(dw) = \int_\Lambda f(x) \, \mu(dx) = \int_{(a,b)} f(x) \, dF(x)[/tex]
If the probability measure doesn't have any atoms, the final integral is just a Lebesgue integral. If there are atoms, you need to take care to specify the interval according to whether the endpoints are or are not included - e.g.
[tex]
\int_{a+0}^{b+0} f(x) \,dF(x), \quad \int_{a-0}^{b-0} f(x) \, dF(x)[/tex]
and so on.
Billingsley is one of the "classic" probability texts. Chang's "A Course in Probability Theory" is another - I studied from it many years ago, and have the second edition. His writing is a little terse, but there is a lot packed into his book.