How to interpret the difference in height between two people in this Ames room?

AI Thread Summary
The Ames room creates an optical illusion where two people of different heights appear to be the same height due to manipulated spatial dimensions. The room's design eliminates typical monocular depth cues, leading to misinterpretations of size and distance. Observations about the peculiar alignment of walls and lighting contribute to the confusion regarding the perceived heights of the individuals. The viewer's brain is tricked into assuming a rectangular shape for the room, despite its actual distorted geometry. Understanding the principles of the Ames room can enhance comprehension of visual perception and optical illusions.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement: From a description of the photo below, the woman on the left is actually taller than the boy on the right.
Relevant Equations: This is a so-called "Ames room" and has been constructed to eliminate the usual monocular depth cues that our eyes use to determine distance based on one eye only.

Here is the photo of the room

1729166510452.png


I cannot understand how it can be that she is taller.

In terms of the number of floor tiles, she seems to be just one tile further away from us and each tile is not that long.

There is something weird going on with the wall at the back of the room.

When I look at the lighting on the wall, it looks like the wall behind the woman is behind the wall with the painting and the wall behind the boy is in front of the wall with the painting.

On the other hand, looking at where the walls meet the tiles, it looks like both walls behind the people are in front of the wall behind the painting.

The side walls are also peculiar. It seems like the wall on the left-hand side is taller than the wall on the right-hand side when we look at just the walls. Then again, using the back wall both walls seem to have the same final height.

What gives?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with Ames rooms?
If not, please see:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ames_room

If yes, note how the reflections on the floor do not converge towards the observer (you), as in a normal perspective.

The the frame of the picture located on the back wall is not perfectly rectangular, but as your line of vision has been artificially moved to the left, it looks rectangular.
 
  • Like
Likes Motore and Lord Jestocost
zenterix said:
Homework Statement: From a description of the photo below, the woman on the left is actually taller than the boy on the right.
Relevant Equations: This is a so-called "Ames room" and has been constructed to eliminate the usual monocular depth cues that our eyes use to determine distance based on one eye only.

Here is the photo of the room

View attachment 352390

I cannot understand how it can be that she is taller.

In terms of the number of floor tiles, she seems to be just one tile further away from us and each tile is not that long.

There is something weird going on with the wall at the back of the room.

When I look at the lighting on the wall, it looks like the wall behind the woman is behind the wall with the painting and the wall behind the boy is in front of the wall with the painting.

On the other hand, looking at where the walls meet the tiles, it looks like both walls behind the people are in front of the wall behind the painting.

The side walls are also peculiar. It seems like the wall on the left-hand side is taller than the wall on the right-hand side when we look at just the walls. Then again, using the back wall both walls seem to have the same final height.

What gives?
The Ames Room presents the viewer with what appears to be a rectangular room with parallel walls and floors when viewed monocularly from one vantage point. On the homepage of the “Project Lite” from the Boston University you find a DIY “Ames Room Demonstration” under the link “LITE Inkjet Science”: https://www.bu.edu/lite/inkjet-science/index.html
 
zenterix said:
What gives?

There's a fantastic book "Basic Vision: an introduction to visual perception" that has a whole chapter devoted to how our brain extracts 3-D information based on visual cues and provides many examples of optical illusions that exploit this (the Ames room illusion is one).
 
  • Like
Likes PhDeezNutz, Lnewqban and Lord Jestocost
Lnewqban said:
The the frame of the picture located on the back wall is not perfectly rectangular, but as your line of vision has been artificially moved to the left, it looks rectangular.
The viewer's brain assumes everything in the room is rectangular, but nothing in that room is rectangular.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters, jbriggs444 and Lnewqban
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Hello! I would like to apply an electric field of 100 V/cm, along the z-axis (defined by an externally applied DC field), with a frequency of 100 MHz at the location of an atomic cloud (everything is inside ultra high vacuum). We can assume that the atoms are located in a volume with a diameter of 50 microns (e.g. in an optical dipole trap). However, I need to minimize any induced magnetic field along the z-axis at 100 MHz as much as possible (ideally at the nano Gauss level or below). Does...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top