How to interpret the difference in height between two people in this Ames room?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter zenterix
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Perspective Vision
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Ames room illusion creates a deceptive perception of size and height by manipulating spatial cues. In this specific case, the woman on the left appears taller than the boy on the right due to the room's design, which eliminates monocular depth cues. The walls and floor tiles are arranged in a way that distorts the viewer's perception, making it seem as if the walls are parallel and rectangular, despite their true shapes. This phenomenon is further explained in the book "Basic Vision: an introduction to visual perception," which discusses how our brains interpret 3-D information from visual cues.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of optical illusions and visual perception.
  • Familiarity with the concept of monocular depth cues.
  • Basic knowledge of geometry related to shapes and angles.
  • Awareness of visual perception theories, particularly in relation to spatial awareness.
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the principles of optical illusions in depth.
  • Research the construction and design of Ames rooms.
  • Study the effects of perspective on visual perception.
  • Read "Basic Vision: an introduction to visual perception" for comprehensive insights into visual cues.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for psychology students, educators in visual perception, artists interested in optical illusions, and anyone studying the effects of perspective in visual arts.

zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement: From a description of the photo below, the woman on the left is actually taller than the boy on the right.
Relevant Equations: This is a so-called "Ames room" and has been constructed to eliminate the usual monocular depth cues that our eyes use to determine distance based on one eye only.

Here is the photo of the room

1729166510452.png


I cannot understand how it can be that she is taller.

In terms of the number of floor tiles, she seems to be just one tile further away from us and each tile is not that long.

There is something weird going on with the wall at the back of the room.

When I look at the lighting on the wall, it looks like the wall behind the woman is behind the wall with the painting and the wall behind the boy is in front of the wall with the painting.

On the other hand, looking at where the walls meet the tiles, it looks like both walls behind the people are in front of the wall behind the painting.

The side walls are also peculiar. It seems like the wall on the left-hand side is taller than the wall on the right-hand side when we look at just the walls. Then again, using the back wall both walls seem to have the same final height.

What gives?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Are you familiar with Ames rooms?
If not, please see:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ames_room

If yes, note how the reflections on the floor do not converge towards the observer (you), as in a normal perspective.

The the frame of the picture located on the back wall is not perfectly rectangular, but as your line of vision has been artificially moved to the left, it looks rectangular.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Motore and Lord Jestocost
zenterix said:
Homework Statement: From a description of the photo below, the woman on the left is actually taller than the boy on the right.
Relevant Equations: This is a so-called "Ames room" and has been constructed to eliminate the usual monocular depth cues that our eyes use to determine distance based on one eye only.

Here is the photo of the room

View attachment 352390

I cannot understand how it can be that she is taller.

In terms of the number of floor tiles, she seems to be just one tile further away from us and each tile is not that long.

There is something weird going on with the wall at the back of the room.

When I look at the lighting on the wall, it looks like the wall behind the woman is behind the wall with the painting and the wall behind the boy is in front of the wall with the painting.

On the other hand, looking at where the walls meet the tiles, it looks like both walls behind the people are in front of the wall behind the painting.

The side walls are also peculiar. It seems like the wall on the left-hand side is taller than the wall on the right-hand side when we look at just the walls. Then again, using the back wall both walls seem to have the same final height.

What gives?
The Ames Room presents the viewer with what appears to be a rectangular room with parallel walls and floors when viewed monocularly from one vantage point. On the homepage of the “Project Lite” from the Boston University you find a DIY “Ames Room Demonstration” under the link “LITE Inkjet Science”: https://www.bu.edu/lite/inkjet-science/index.html
 
zenterix said:
What gives?

There's a fantastic book "Basic Vision: an introduction to visual perception" that has a whole chapter devoted to how our brain extracts 3-D information based on visual cues and provides many examples of optical illusions that exploit this (the Ames room illusion is one).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PhDeezNutz, Lnewqban and Lord Jestocost
Lnewqban said:
The the frame of the picture located on the back wall is not perfectly rectangular, but as your line of vision has been artificially moved to the left, it looks rectangular.
The viewer's brain assumes everything in the room is rectangular, but nothing in that room is rectangular.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, jbriggs444 and Lnewqban

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K