How to interpret the diffraction envelope

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Bill Sellers
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Diffraction
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of diffraction and interference patterns in the context of 1-slit and 2-slit experiments. Participants explore how these patterns relate to the number of photons detected on a screen and the implications of slit width and intensity on the observed results.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants question whether the diffraction pattern from a single slit can be interpreted as an envelope for the interference pattern from a double slit, particularly in terms of photon detection.
  • Others argue that comparisons between the number of photons detected in single and double slit setups require careful consideration of factors like slit width and source intensity.
  • A participant suggests that if the single slit envelope reflects a scenario where one slit is closed and the other is widened, the photon count should remain consistent, yet the interference pattern appears to show fewer photons.
  • Another participant notes that graphs of these patterns are often normalized to peak intensity, indicating that absolute count rates may not be directly comparable between setups.
  • A rule of thumb is mentioned regarding the relationship between slit configurations and peak intensity, suggesting that with two slits, the peak intensity could be four times higher than with one slit, and this increases with more slits.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between photon detection and the patterns observed in single and double slit experiments. There is no consensus on the implications of these observations, and the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on definitions of intensity and normalization of graphs, as well as assumptions about slit width and source intensity that have not been explicitly stated.

Bill Sellers
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Explanations of 2-slit interference sometimes show the interference pattern compared to a 1-slit diffraction pattern, and state that the latter represents a limit or envelope for the former. Is it correct to interpret the patterns as representing (directly or indirectly) the number of photons being detected at locations on the screen? If so, then wouldn’t this imply that fewer photons are detected in the 2-slit setup vs. 1-slit?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bill Sellers said:
If so, then wouldn’t this imply that fewer photons are detected in the 2-slit setup vs. 1-slit?
When you compare number of photons to the screen between a single slit and a double slit experiment, you need to specify what is the same and what is different. Of course the source intensity is the same but what about the slit width? If the same number of photons per unit time goes through the double slit arrangement as goes through the single slit, then you should collect the same number of photons at the screen.
 
Thank you very much for taking the time to respond to my query. I'm trying to understand a graphic such as the one at http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/phyopt/dslit.html. I'm guessing that the single slit envelope shows the pattern you'd get if you closed one of the slits and doubled the width of the remaining one. If that guess is correct, then presumably the same number of photons per unit time should be going through. But the interference pattern doesn't seem to reflect that--it seems to be showing fewer photons.
 
Such graphs are usually normalized to the peak intensity, so the absolute values of the count rates are not comparable.

As a rule of thumb: If you have one slit of a certain width which is illuminated with a certain intensity and now change to a different setting with two slits close to each other, where each of the two slits gets the same intensity as the single slit and has the same size, you will have twice the field in the area of constructive interference (if it is located in the middle between the slits). Accordingly, the peak intensity will be 4 times as high as before. If you use 3 slits, it will be 9 times as high. If you use many slits...you have just built a diffraction grating.
 
4 times--thanks, that makes sense!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 81 ·
3
Replies
81
Views
7K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K