- #1
- 10
- 0
I want to make kers for my two wheeler.How should i start and what are the things that i should consider??
how does that matter?Is it an electric two wheeler?
how does that matter?
What you have to start with matters...
Read about regenerative braking and I think you'll understand.
That's a great proof of concept, but for a 15 pound flywheel at any significant rpm, the support is just not good (Imho)Not true. The link shows that you can do this with a regular bike and a bit of ingenuity.
http://www.gizmag.com/flywheel-bicycle-regenerative-braking/19532/
I have always liked the Hub Motor for electric, but the idea of flywheel energy storage for take off assist, is high on my list of ideas.
Biggest challenge is, most states have weight and speed limits, which cuts deeply into energy storage density.
No!, the speed and weight generally apply to electric power and a limit of around 700 watts at the motor.Speed limits on how fast the flywheel can turn? I was about to suggest a carbon-fiber flywheel. It's light enough to be worthwhile but you can get that thing to spin up really fast. If there's limits to flywheel speed, then that's out.
flywheel cause control problems related to resistance to lean or turning.
It might be that a second flywheel spinning in the opposite direction would solve most of the problems, however that begins to increase the engineering design efforts of dual input and power take-off applications.Oh Jeeze! I didn't think of that. A spinning flywheel on a bicycle (road or MTB) could be a very bad thing. Maybe if it could gimbal it wouldn't be a problem. But that would make getting energy into and out of the flywheel much more difficult...
a second flywheel spinning in the opposite direction
It might be that a second flywheel spinning in the opposite direction would solve most of the problems, however that begins to increase the engineering design efforts of dual input and power take-off applications.
Looking at road construction concrete saw blades, you can find a blade 28" diameter and about 1/8" thick with a weight of about 15 pounds.Yeah the engineering would have to be more significant, but you'd have to do some sort of "balanced system" like that to make it work.
"Ten per cent?" This is for some sort of "Hare & Hounds" cross-country, steeplechase obstacle course? Two seconds on the throttle, two seconds on the brakes until you're seasick?just to save you maybe 10 percent of the energy you expend
"Ten per cent?" This is for some sort of "Hare & Hounds" cross-country, steeplechase obstacle course? Two seconds on the throttle, two seconds on the brakes until you're seasick?
Don't quite get what you mean.
Back of the envelope bookkeeping on recovery systems just for ordinary driving, I couldn't begin to get 5% for "soccer moms" doing "stop and go" all over town, let alone pay for hauling the additional mass necessary for the recovery around.so 10% was a number I picked out of thin air.
Back of the envelope bookkeeping on recovery systems just for ordinary driving, I couldn't begin to get 5% for "soccer moms" doing "stop and go" all over town, let alone pay for hauling the additional mass necessary for the recovery around.