tdev
- 10
- 0
I want to make kers for my two wheeler.How should i start and what are the things that i should consider??
The discussion revolves around the design and implementation of a Kinetic Energy Recovery System (KERS) for two-wheelers. Participants explore various aspects including mechanical and electrical systems, energy storage methods, and the practicality of such systems in different types of two-wheelers.
Participants express various viewpoints on the feasibility and effectiveness of KERS for two-wheelers, with no consensus reached on the best approach or the potential energy savings. Multiple competing views remain regarding the practicality of mechanical versus electrical systems and the implications of added weight.
Participants highlight limitations related to weight and speed regulations, as well as the assumptions about energy recovery efficiency in different riding scenarios. There is also uncertainty about the specific type of two-wheeler being discussed, which affects the design considerations.
how does that matter?montoyas7940 said:Is it an electric two wheeler?
tdev said:how does that matter?
montoyas7940 said:What you have to start with matters...
Read about regenerative braking and I think you'll understand.
That's a great proof of concept, but for a 15 pound flywheel at any significant rpm, the support is just not good (Imho)timthereaper said:Not true. The link shows that you can do this with a regular bike and a bit of ingenuity.
http://www.gizmag.com/flywheel-bicycle-regenerative-braking/19532/
:)RonL said:I have always liked the Hub Motor for electric, but the idea of flywheel energy storage for take off assist, is high on my list of ideas.
Biggest challenge is, most states have weight and speed limits, which cuts deeply into energy storage density.
No!, the speed and weight generally apply to electric power and a limit of around 700 watts at the motor.timthereaper said:Speed limits on how fast the flywheel can turn? I was about to suggest a carbon-fiber flywheel. It's light enough to be worthwhile but you can get that thing to spin up really fast. If there's limits to flywheel speed, then that's out.
RonL said:flywheel cause control problems related to resistance to lean or turning.
It might be that a second flywheel spinning in the opposite direction would solve most of the problems, however that begins to increase the engineering design efforts of dual input and power take-off applications.berkeman said:Oh Jeeze! I didn't think of that. A spinning flywheel on a bicycle (road or MTB) could be a very bad thing. Maybe if it could gimbal it wouldn't be a problem. But that would make getting energy into and out of the flywheel much more difficult...
RonL said:a second flywheel spinning in the opposite direction
RonL said:It might be that a second flywheel spinning in the opposite direction would solve most of the problems, however that begins to increase the engineering design efforts of dual input and power take-off applications.
Looking at road construction concrete saw blades, you can find a blade 28" diameter and about 1/8" thick with a weight of about 15 pounds.timthereaper said:Yeah the engineering would have to be more significant, but you'd have to do some sort of "balanced system" like that to make it work.
"Ten per cent?" This is for some sort of "Hare & Hounds" cross-country, steeplechase obstacle course? Two seconds on the throttle, two seconds on the brakes until you're seasick?timthereaper said:just to save you maybe 10 percent of the energy you expend
Bystander said:"Ten per cent?" This is for some sort of "Hare & Hounds" cross-country, steeplechase obstacle course? Two seconds on the throttle, two seconds on the brakes until you're seasick?
timthereaper said:Don't quite get what you mean.
Back of the envelope bookkeeping on recovery systems just for ordinary driving, I couldn't begin to get 5% for "soccer moms" doing "stop and go" all over town, let alone pay for hauling the additional mass necessary for the recovery around.timthereaper said:so 10% was a number I picked out of thin air.
Bystander said:Back of the envelope bookkeeping on recovery systems just for ordinary driving, I couldn't begin to get 5% for "soccer moms" doing "stop and go" all over town, let alone pay for hauling the additional mass necessary for the recovery around.