How to make KERS (Kintetic Energy Recovery System) for 2-wheeler?

  • Thread starter Thread starter tdev
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Energy System
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design and implementation of a Kinetic Energy Recovery System (KERS) for two-wheelers. Participants explore various aspects including mechanical and electrical systems, energy storage methods, and the practicality of such systems in different types of two-wheelers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants inquire whether the two-wheeler is electric, suggesting that this distinction affects the design approach.
  • There are considerations regarding the required capacity and power for the KERS, with specific examples provided, such as a 100 kg load decelerating from 50 kph.
  • Some participants discuss the feasibility of using regenerative braking and express skepticism about the practicality of carrying additional weight for energy recovery.
  • There are suggestions for using flywheel energy storage, with concerns raised about the weight and speed limits imposed by regulations.
  • Participants debate the potential control issues associated with a spinning flywheel on a bicycle, with some proposing solutions like using a second flywheel spinning in the opposite direction.
  • There are differing opinions on the energy savings that could be achieved with such systems, with some participants expressing doubt about the effectiveness of KERS in typical riding conditions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the feasibility and effectiveness of KERS for two-wheelers, with no consensus reached on the best approach or the potential energy savings. Multiple competing views remain regarding the practicality of mechanical versus electrical systems and the implications of added weight.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations related to weight and speed regulations, as well as the assumptions about energy recovery efficiency in different riding scenarios. There is also uncertainty about the specific type of two-wheeler being discussed, which affects the design considerations.

tdev
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I want to make kers for my two wheeler.How should i start and what are the things that i should consider??
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Is it an electric two wheeler?
 
Ahh, KERS (capitalized abbreviation) for Kintetic Energy Recovery System.

Consider its required capacity and power (time rate). 100 kg from 50 kph to zero at 1/3 g for a bicycle HPV.
 
montoyas7940 said:
Is it an electric two wheeler?
how does that matter?
 
tdev said:
how does that matter?

What you have to start with matters...
Read about regenerative braking and I think you'll understand.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RonL
timthereaper said:
Not true. The link shows that you can do this with a regular bike and a bit of ingenuity.

http://www.gizmag.com/flywheel-bicycle-regenerative-braking/19532/
That's a great proof of concept, but for a 15 pound flywheel at any significant rpm, the support is just not good (Imho) :cool: I say this only to raise awareness for anyone that might just jump up and throw something together :nb):)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: timthereaper
I totally agree. It's shows good thinking and it's all mechanical, but I don't quite see the allure of carrying around 15 extra pounds on a bike just to save you maybe 10 percent of the energy you expend. This link is a sexier version of the electric bike conversion kit: https://www.superpedestrian.com/. I think this might be closer to something people might invest in (but I'm not a cyclist).
 
I have always liked the Hub Motor for electric, but the idea of flywheel energy storage for take off assist, is high on my list of ideas.
Biggest challenge is, most states have weight and speed limits, which cuts deeply into energy storage density.
 
  • #10
Does the OP want a purely mechanical system? If the two wheeler is electric, a simple regen system might be easier.

We still don't know if Op is starting with a gas motorcycle, pedal bike or electric bike. It matters.
 
  • #11
@tdev -- I see you are on the forum today. How about dropping into this thread and letting us know what you are wanting to do... :-)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: timthereaper and RonL
  • #12
RonL said:
I have always liked the Hub Motor for electric, but the idea of flywheel energy storage for take off assist, is high on my list of ideas.
Biggest challenge is, most states have weight and speed limits, which cuts deeply into energy storage density.

Speed limits on how fast the flywheel can turn? I was about to suggest a carbon-fiber flywheel. It's light enough to be worthwhile but you can get that thing to spin up really fast. If there's limits to flywheel speed, then that's out.
 
  • #13
timthereaper said:
Speed limits on how fast the flywheel can turn? I was about to suggest a carbon-fiber flywheel. It's light enough to be worthwhile but you can get that thing to spin up really fast. If there's limits to flywheel speed, then that's out.
No!, the speed and weight generally apply to electric power and a limit of around 700 watts at the motor.
A properly enclosed flywheel should not draw much restriction other than, if speeds of the flywheel cause control problems related to resistance to lean or turning.
 
  • #14
RonL said:
flywheel cause control problems related to resistance to lean or turning.

Oh Jeeze! I didn't think of that. A spinning flywheel on a bicycle (road or MTB) could be a very bad thing. Maybe if it could gimbal it wouldn't be a problem. But that would make getting energy into and out of the flywheel much more difficult...
 
  • #15
berkeman said:
Oh Jeeze! I didn't think of that. A spinning flywheel on a bicycle (road or MTB) could be a very bad thing. Maybe if it could gimbal it wouldn't be a problem. But that would make getting energy into and out of the flywheel much more difficult...
It might be that a second flywheel spinning in the opposite direction would solve most of the problems, however that begins to increase the engineering design efforts of dual input and power take-off applications.
 
  • #16
RonL said:
a second flywheel spinning in the opposite direction

Ah, good idea! :-)
 
  • #17
RonL said:
It might be that a second flywheel spinning in the opposite direction would solve most of the problems, however that begins to increase the engineering design efforts of dual input and power take-off applications.

Yeah the engineering would have to be more significant, but you'd have to do some sort of "balanced system" like that to make it work.
 
  • #18
timthereaper said:
Yeah the engineering would have to be more significant, but you'd have to do some sort of "balanced system" like that to make it work.
Looking at road construction concrete saw blades, you can find a blade 28" diameter and about 1/8" thick with a weight of about 15 pounds.
Mount one on each side of the frame and there will be little to indicate there are two flywheels, they are rated around 2500 RPM (while making cuts in concrete) the energy storage for a bicycle should be pretty generous. Just a quick thought :)
New they price from $800.00 to as much as $1500.00, on some occasions a concrete contractor will give them away and not bother having them reconditioned.
 
  • #19
I'm not adding no 30 pounds to my bike! :w
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RonL
  • #20
timthereaper said:
just to save you maybe 10 percent of the energy you expend
"Ten per cent?" This is for some sort of "Hare & Hounds" cross-country, steeplechase obstacle course? Two seconds on the throttle, two seconds on the brakes until you're seasick?
 
  • #21
We don't know. It is a secret.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: RonL
  • #22
Bystander said:
"Ten per cent?" This is for some sort of "Hare & Hounds" cross-country, steeplechase obstacle course? Two seconds on the throttle, two seconds on the brakes until you're seasick?

Don't quite get what you mean. I haven't done any real number crunching, so 10% was a number I picked out of thin air. I can't imagine a system like this saving more than that amount of energy. Maybe I'm wrong though...it's been known to happen :-)
 
  • #23
timthereaper said:
Don't quite get what you mean.
timthereaper said:
so 10% was a number I picked out of thin air.
Back of the envelope bookkeeping on recovery systems just for ordinary driving, I couldn't begin to get 5% for "soccer moms" doing "stop and go" all over town, let alone pay for hauling the additional mass necessary for the recovery around.
 
  • #24
Bystander said:
Back of the envelope bookkeeping on recovery systems just for ordinary driving, I couldn't begin to get 5% for "soccer moms" doing "stop and go" all over town, let alone pay for hauling the additional mass necessary for the recovery around.

Totally agree.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
18K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
7K