How to motivate students to do proofs?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on motivating undergraduate students in a discrete mathematics module to engage with mathematical proofs. Key strategies include presenting incorrect proofs for analysis, utilizing geometric and set-based proofs, and emphasizing the elegance of different proof methods, such as various approaches to the Pythagorean theorem. The Abel theorem is highlighted as a significant example demonstrating the limitations of formulas for quintic polynomials. The overarching challenge is overcoming students' focus on grades rather than deep understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of discrete mathematics concepts
  • Familiarity with basic proof techniques
  • Knowledge of the Abel theorem and its implications
  • Experience with geometric and set-based proofs
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore methods for analyzing incorrect proofs in mathematics
  • Study the various proof techniques for the Pythagorean theorem
  • Investigate the implications of the Abel theorem in advanced mathematics
  • Research strategies for enhancing student engagement in mathematical reasoning
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics educators, undergraduate instructors, and curriculum developers seeking to enhance student engagement and understanding of mathematical proofs.

matqkks
Messages
282
Reaction score
6
I am finding it difficult to motivate students on why they should how to prove mathematical results. They learn them just to pass examinations but show no real interest or enthusiasm for this.
How can I inspire them to love essential kind of mathematics? They love doing mathematical techniques. Any resources or any answers would really help me.
 
Science news on Phys.org
May depend on the type of students and what or why they are studying.
What level of students? What level of courses?

Very very broadly, at some point in the future, a student (now) may ultimately need to ask himself, which side of this does he want to be on:
"Come, Mr. Tally Man, tally my bananas."
 
Last edited:
You can find some examples of where commonsense indicates one answer but the proof shows otherwise. The one problem with students is the drive to get good marks trumps thinking more deeply about problems. Proofs like great literary works requires a depth of understanding that students may not want to exert.

The Abel theorem is a good example wher a proof proves once and for all there is no formula like the quadratic formula for quintic polynomials. In essence saying you can stop looking for one.
 
Last edited:
symbolipoint said:
May depend on the type of students and what or why they are studying.
What level of students? What level of courses?

Very very broadly, at some point in the future, a student (now) may ultimately need to ask himself, which side of this does he want to be on:
"Come, Mr. Tally Man, tally my bananas."
They are undergraduates doing a discrete mathematics module.
 
Are they any good at writing proofs? Most students are horribly bad at it initially, and that may be part of the reason they're reluctant to do it.

One thing you might try is giving them incorrect proofs and asking them to figure out where the errors are.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: matqkks
I think geometric or set based proofs are a good starting point.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: matqkks
With respect to bad proofs, the angle trisection proofs are good where you can’t decide whether two arcs and a line intersect at the same point.

Another idea is to show the economy of expressions in proofs. As an example, there are many ways to prove the Pythagorean theorem some of which are more elegant and profound than others.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: matqkks

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
32
Views
1K
  • · Replies 76 ·
3
Replies
76
Views
6K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 67 ·
3
Replies
67
Views
10K
  • · Replies 101 ·
4
Replies
101
Views
14K