How to obtain Axial Load Capacity from Tapered Roller Bearings Catalog

AI Thread Summary
Selecting a tapered roller bearing (TRB) for an actuator requires understanding both axial and radial loads, but manufacturers primarily provide dynamic and static load ratings. The discussion highlights confusion over whether to use the dynamic load rating as an equivalent load for axial capacity. Additionally, the advantages of back-to-back (DB) versus face-to-face (DF) configurations in axial load capacity are debated, with calculations showing minimal differences in equivalent load and bearing life. Despite literature suggesting DB offers superior axial load capacity and rigidity, the close positioning of bearings raises questions about the practical benefits in specific applications. Ultimately, the choice between configurations may depend on the specific load conditions and design requirements.
AeroGeek
Messages
12
Reaction score
1
Hello there,

I'm trying to select a tapered roller bearing (TRB) for my actuator, I know the peak axial force that is going to come. I have some radial load as well.
I want to select the TRB based on the axial load, but all the bearing catalogs or most of them give Dynamic and static Load Ratings.

Do I have to consider the given(from the bearing manufacturers) dynamic load rating as equivalent load and use it?
Thank you in Advance.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
All bearing manufacturers usually explain how to select bearing size and give all the needed info.

You got the basic info very well-presented here. But SKF shows a more in-depth presentation of the same info here.
 
  • Like
Likes AeroGeek and Lnewqban
jack action said:
All bearing manufacturers usually explain how to select bearing size and give all the needed info.

You got the basic info very well-presented here. But SKF shows a more in-depth presentation of the same info here.
Thank you, it's really well shown here. Yes, some bearing manufacturers have more in-depth, and its confusing sometimes which to consider.
 
jack action said:
All bearing manufacturers usually explain how to select bearing size and give all the needed info.

You got the basic info very well-presented here. But SKF shows a more in-depth presentation of the same info here.
Hi I have gone through many literature now. and yet i'm unable to figure out why the Back to Back Tapered roller Bearing arrangement is better in axial load capacity. How to justify with numbers when compared to face to face configuration
 
Physix_Forums.JPG

I calculated the loads on points A and B, Keeping the bearings the same in back-to-back (DB) and face-to-face (DF), L2 for back-to-back is 4-5 times that of face-to-face, i.e. 50 mm for DB and 10mm for DF. After the calculations for Equivalent load and bearing life, both have not changed much. there is a slight reduction in Equivalent load and Bearing for the DF. If the difference is so less, then can I not use DF instead of DB ?
But all the textbooks and literature says DB has more axial load capacity and rigidity. I agree with rigidity because of L2, but in my case, since the bearings are very close that I am unable to figure out which is a better configuration.
In my case, the Axial load is higher, and the radial load is minimal.? Any thoughts would be welcome
 
How did you find PF?: Via Google search Hi, I have a vessel I 3D printed to investigate single bubble rise. The vessel has a 4 mm gap separated by acrylic panels. This is essentially my viewing chamber where I can record the bubble motion. The vessel is open to atmosphere. The bubble generation mechanism is composed of a syringe pump and glass capillary tube (Internal Diameter of 0.45 mm). I connect a 1/4” air line hose from the syringe to the capillary The bubble is formed at the tip...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
I'd like to create a thread with links to 3-D Printer resources, including printers and software package suggestions. My motivations are selfish, as I have a 3-D printed project that I'm working on, and I'd like to buy a simple printer and use low cost software to make the first prototype. There are some previous threads about 3-D printing like this: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/are-3d-printers-easy-to-use-yet.917489/ but none that address the overall topic (unless I've missed...
Back
Top