- 8,032
- 869
Not clear what you are asking here?rude man said:Guys, this is a real-life problem, especially now in Phoenix in June!
Wolfram Alpha gave me this:
Must be easier than that??
I am looking for the expression for ## \rho(t) ## so I can optimally adjust the effluent flow rate.russ_watters said:...and while it says "evaporative cooler", the diagram and process description in the OP doesn't look anything like an evaporative cooler to me.
cf. post 6.bob012345 said:Not clear what you are asking here?
Nope, just give me ## \rho(t) ##.Chestermiller said:The problem statement makes sense to me. Is there more to it than that?
Well I tried ...russ_watters said:...and while it says "evaporative cooler", the diagram and process description in the OP doesn't look anything like an evaporative cooler to me.
This cooler would not work - for long. There is no provision for effluent so reservoir salinity would build up until the pads are solid salt! (Inlet water, depending on your area, always contains impurities, particujlarly salts).bob012345 said:
I wasn't criticizing your art skills, I was saying you didn't describe an evaporative cooling process. But I think I see it now...rude man said:Well I tried ...![]()
Why ## \rho(t) ## ? If you want a specific effluent impurity density, why not just do a single-point(in time)/steady-state mixing calculation to find the required flow rate for it? ##V1/V2 = \rho2/\rho1 ##rude man said:I am looking for the expression for ## \rho(t) ## so I can optimally adjust the effluent flow rate.
Basic swamp cooler operation:
Water runs over pads; evaporates; that cools the pads, then air is blown past the pads into the house. If the air is very dry a swamp cooler can produce air almost as cold as an air conditioner.
Ah... ok, so it's a side question that you are asking about in addition to or instead of the main question...rude man said:I should add that deriving ## \rho_{~final} ## does not require solving for the time function but I also wanted an idea of the time required to reach (close to) equilibrium. Besides, it looked like a good physics challenge.
My question was 'what is ## \rho(t) ##.'russ_watters said:Ah... ok, so it's a side question that you are asking about in addition to or instead of the main question...
For that you can use the differential equation for concentration in mixing/dilution vs time:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilution_(equation)#Dilution_ventilation_equation
As described it's for ventilation, but should work the same for your scenario.
I wanted the time to reach equilibrium, not just the final values.russ_watters said:Why ## \rho(t) ## ? If you want a specific effluent impurity density, why not just do a single-point(in time)/steady-state mixing calculation to find the required flow rate for it? ##V1/V2 = \rho2/\rho1 ##
Where ## V1 - V3 = V2 ##
Knowns:russ_watters said:What are your knowns? Do you know or need to calculate the evaporation rate? I don't see how you can calculate the supply water rate without it.
Well since you're interested: for the system you describe (1) the water is not cool as it is in a tank (summer water here runs around 90F!); (2) our city water would soon deposit salts on the pads to the extent that they have to be replaced quite frequently. Lots of fun climbing onto the roof when it's 115F+ ! Also, pad replacement is a bear to do.russ_watters said:Also, what is the point of the tank? For systems I've seen they just run the water over the pad and what's left goes straight to drain without a tank...or pump. If you are circulating the tank water over the pad and filling/emptying from the tank, then you have high impurity water going over the pad. This isn't critical to your question though...\quote