How to Prove a Limit Using Epsilon and Delta?

  • Thread starter Thread starter gipc
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition Limit
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving limits using epsilon-delta definitions in calculus, specifically focusing on limits involving rational and irrational numbers. Participants are examining how to approach the proofs and the implications of the definitions on their reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants suggest splitting the problem into cases for rational and irrational numbers and finding appropriate deltas for each. There are inquiries about the correctness of chosen deltas and the application of the epsilon-delta definition in various limit scenarios.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to approach the problem, while others are questioning their understanding of the definitions and the implications of their choices. There is an ongoing exploration of the limits and the conditions under which they hold.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about handling cases where x belongs to the rationals or irrationals, and how this affects the proof. There are also mentions of needing to ensure that delta is appropriately constrained, such as being less than 1.

gipc
Messages
69
Reaction score
0
Can someone please help me prove the following limit using epsilons and deltas?
[PLAIN]http://img408.imageshack.us/img408/503/limesn.jpg

I'll be most thankful for any help :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Split the problem up. Find a delta for the rationals, and then find a delta for the irrationals. Then just take the minimum of the two deltas. It's just a combination of two problems you probably already know how to do.
 
Can someone perhaps show me the deltas that apply? I'm not sure I'm doing it absolutely right.
 
If you are not sure you are doing it absolutely right, then, hopefully, you are doing something! Show us what you are doing and we will try to help.
 
I'm unsure how to handle the fact the x belongs to Q or doesn't belong to Q and how it affects the solution. The problem is that I have to give a solid proof using the definition and I don't know how it changes things.

Is this correct?
lim x+2=1 as x->(-1)

I need to show that 0<|x+1|<delta => |f(x)-L|=|x+2-1|=|x+1|<?epsilon
so if I choose delta=epsilon the condition will stand.
is this okay?

and what about lim x^2 as x->(-1)
if 0<|x-1|<delta then i need to show that for every epsilon,
|x^2 -1|<epsilon
but |x^2-1|=|x-1||x+1|<|x+1|
so if I choose delta=epsilon+1 this will work.

Did i choose the correct deltas?
 
The first one is ok. For the second one you want |x^2-1|=|x-1|*|x+1|<epsilon. But |x-1|*|x+1| isn't less than |x+1|. Make sure delta is always less than 1, eventually say delta=min(1,...). Then since |x+1|<1, -2<x<0. Then |x-1| is between 1 and 3.
 
Let me see if I understand.
since |x+1|<1 then 1<|x-1|<3 and then we can see more clearly that |x^2-1|=|x-1||x+1|<|x+1| (because |x-1| is bigger than |x+1|).

so we get |x+1|<?epsilon
and thus delta=epsilon-1

so in the end we'll take delta=min(1, epsilon-1)?
 
|x-1||x+1| isn't less than |x+1|. I already told you this. If x=(-2), |x-1|=3. 3*|x+1| isn't less than |x+1|.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
918
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
6K