How to prove that Cosh(x) = Cos(ix)

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter cocopops12
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the identities Cosh(x) = Cos(ix) and Sinh(x) = Sin(ix) using Euler's identity. Participants highlight that Cosh(x) can be expressed as (e^x + e^-x) / 2 and derive related formulas for sine and cosine through manipulation of exponential functions. The inverse Laplace transformation is also utilized to demonstrate that cos(i*t) = cosh(t) and sin(i*t) = sinh(t), confirming the relationships between hyperbolic and trigonometric functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Euler's identity: e^(ix) = cos(x) + i*sin(x)
  • Familiarity with hyperbolic functions: Cosh(x) and Sinh(x)
  • Knowledge of Laplace transformations and their inverse
  • Ability to manipulate complex numbers and exponential functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of hyperbolic functions from exponential functions
  • Learn about the properties and applications of Laplace transformations
  • Explore the relationship between trigonometric and hyperbolic identities
  • Investigate further applications of Euler's formula in complex analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in complex analysis and the relationships between trigonometric and hyperbolic functions.

cocopops12
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
i know that Cosh(x) = (E^x + E^-x ) / 2

how do i prove that Cosh(x) = Cos(ix) , where i is the imaginary unit
similarly Cosh(ix) = Cos(x)

and Sin(ix) = i Sinh(x)
similarly Sinh(ix) = i Sin(x)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you know any formulas for cosine and sine that relate to exponentials?
 
yeah of course Euler's identity
e^ix = cos(x) + isin(x)
but i still can't do it :(
 
I should have been more clear, sorry. I meant a formula that only involves cosine and exponentials and a formula that only involves sines and exponentials. The cosine formula won't have sines in it and vice versa. Once you have those formulas, this becomes trivial to prove as you'll see.
 
scurty said:
I should have been more clear, sorry. I meant a formula that only involves cosine and exponentials and a formula that only involves sines and exponentials. The cosine formula won't have sines in it and vice versa. Once you have those formulas, this becomes trivial to prove as you'll see.

Best of all, you can derive these from Euler's identity: write down e^{ix} and e^{-ix} using it, and then add the two equations or subtract them to derive the relevant equations.
 
i have those formulas too, but i don't understand how they got them
 
cocopops12 said:
yeah of course Euler's identity
e^ix = cos(x) + isin(x)
but i still can't do it :(
e^ix = cos(x) + isin(x)
e^-ix = cos(x) - isin(x)

Add to get 2cos(x), subtract to get 2isin(x).

I presume you can do the rest.
 
it's clear now! thanks sir!
 
Easy! Just need a Laplace transformation sheet; then look at the transformation of cos(a*t), it says that L{cos(a*t)}=s/(s^2+a^2). That means that the inverse Laplace transformation of s/(s^2+a^2) is cos(at), right.
L^(-1){s/(s^2+a^2)}=cos(a*t)

Then ask yourself... Which is the inverse Laplace transformation of s/(s^2-1)?
that means your a^2 would be -1 so a=sqrt(-1)=i
then L^(-1){s/(s^2-1)}=L^(-1){s/(s^2+i)}=cos(i*t)

Now let do that by partial fractions:
L^(-1){s/(s^2-1)}=L^(-1){A/(s-1)+B/(s+1)}
s/(s^2-1)=A/(s-1)+B/(s+1); then
s/[(s-1)*(s+1)]=A/(s-1)+B/(s+1); then if you multiplie that equation for (s-1)(s+1) you got
s=A*(s+1)+B*(s-1); then
s=A*s+A+B*s-B=(A+B)*s+(A-B); now you got a equation system;
s=(A+B)*s and 0=A-B
A+B=1 and A-B=0; if you resolve
A=1/2=B; so
L^(-1){A/(s-1)+B/(s+1)}=L^(-1){(1/2)/(s-1)+(1/2)/(s+1)}=L^(-1){(1/2)/(s-1)}+L^(-1){(1/2)/(s+1)}=
(1/2)*L^(-1){1/(s-1)}+(1/2)*L^(-1){1/(s+1)}=(1/2)*(L^(-1){1/(s-1)}+L^(-1){1/(s+1)})

If you look at the inverse Laplace transformation formula for 1/(s-a) you will see e^(a*t) so
L^(-1){1/(s-1)}=e^t
and
L^(-1){1/(s+1)}=e^-t
so
(1/2)*(L^(-1){1/(s-1)}+L^(-1){1/(s+1)})=(1/2)*(e^t+e^-t)=(e^t+e^-t)/2=cosh(t)
so cos(i*t)=cosh(t)

It's the same process to proof sen(i*t)=senh(t)
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Kasikh

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
722
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K