How to prove that the shortest distance between two points is a line?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the shortest distance between two points is a straight line, with references to the Hamilton method and the Calculus of Variations. A comparison is made to the brachistochrone problem, which illustrates that the shortest time path in a gravitational field is a catenary, not a straight line. The suggestion is made to explore a mathematical setup with gravitational acceleration set to zero (g=0) to establish the proof definitively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Calculus of Variations
  • Familiarity with the Hamilton method
  • Knowledge of the brachistochrone problem
  • Basic concepts of gravitational fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Calculus of Variations in depth
  • Study the Hamiltonian mechanics framework
  • Examine the mathematical principles behind the brachistochrone problem
  • Explore proofs involving gravitational fields and their implications
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in the principles of optimization and pathfinding in physics and calculus.

madhura2498
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
This is the given functional derivative of distance between the two points:
$$\frac{\partial L[y]}{\partial x_{i} } = \frac{d}{d \lambda } L[y(x) + \lambda \delta(x- x_{i} )] \Big|_{\lambda =0}$$
where $\delta(x-x_i)$ is the Dirac's delta function.

I know the Hamilton Variation method. Don't know how to use the Dirac's delta function in the derivation.
Relevant Equations
$$\frac{\partial L[y]}{\partial x_{i} } = \frac{d}{d \lambda } L[y(x) + \lambda \delta(x- x_{i} )] \Big|_{\lambda =0}$$
where $\delta(x-x_i)$ is the Dirac's delta function.
I tried using hamilton method but i don't think that's correct
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you trying to use Calculus of Variations to prove it?

It reminded me of the brachistochrone problem ie the time is timewise shortest downhill path in a constant g field is a catenary and not a straight line.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brachistochrone_curve

so perhaps a similar math setup with g=0 would prove it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K