How to prove the Fierz identity using fierzing twice?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter yola
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the Fierz identity using the technique of "fierzing" twice, specifically the identity (\bar{\lambda} \gamma_5 \lambda) \lambda = - (\bar{\lambda} \lambda) (\gamma_5 \lambda). The user seeks assistance in understanding this proof but finds the provided reference insufficient. The conversation highlights the challenges faced in applying Fierz transformations in quantum field theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fierz transformations in quantum field theory
  • Familiarity with Dirac spinors and gamma matrices
  • Knowledge of the properties of the gamma_5 matrix
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical proofs and identities
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Fierz transformations in quantum field theory
  • Learn about the properties and implications of the gamma_5 matrix
  • Explore detailed examples of proving identities involving Dirac spinors
  • Review advanced quantum mechanics texts focusing on spinor algebra
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for theoretical physicists, graduate students in quantum field theory, and anyone interested in advanced mathematical techniques in particle physics.

yola
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Hello,
how can i prove by "fierzing" twice that
(\bar{\lambda} \gamma_5 \lambda) \lambda = - (\bar{\lambda} \lambda) (\gamma_5 \lambda)?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Don't know. Is this reference any help? http://gemma.ujf.cas.cz/~brauner/files/Fierz_transform.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:
No, not really. Thanks anyway
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K