How to Prove the Vector Triple Product Identity?

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the vector triple product identity u x (v x w) = (u*w)v - (u*v)w. Participants emphasize the necessity of working within three-dimensional space, as the cross product is not defined in higher dimensions. One suggested method involves using the epsilon notation and summation convention to simplify the proof. The transformation of two epsilon symbols into Kronecker deltas is highlighted as a crucial step in the derivation. Overall, the conversation provides insights into different approaches and clarifies the importance of dimensionality in vector operations.
robierob12
Messages
48
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




Prove that

u x (v x w) = (u*w)v - (u*v)w


Homework Equations



I've been trying to get this one but keep ending up no where.

I've tried the normal algebraic properties of the cross product but they lead me to a dead end.

What I am trying right now is just proving it in three space. Assigning each vector to a general form like (u1, u2, u3) and busting it out to see if I can get the right side identity.

Is there an easyier way to start this out.
Ideas are much appreciated.

Rob


The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
cross product isn't defined for dimensions higher than three, so you would just prove it for three space.
 
I usually do these problems like these using the \varepsilon_{ijk} thingy and the summation convention. If you're not familiar with that notation, this may just confuse you. The epsilon thingy is defined by \varepsilon_{ijk}=1 and the requirement that it's totally antisymmetric, i.e. that if you swap two indices, it will change sign. This implies for example that \varepsilon_{132}=-1 and that \varepsilon_{122}=0. The "summation convention" is that I don't bother writing out the sigmas for summation, since all the indices that we need to sum over always occur exactly twice.

For example the scalar product u*v is u_i v_i=v_1u_1+v_2u_2+v_3u_3 (I don't remember the LaTeX code for the scalar product) and the cross product u\times v is \varepsilon_{ijk}u_jv_ke_i, where the e_i are the basis vectors of \mathbb{R}^3.

The ith component of the left hand side of the equation you're trying to prove is by definition of the cross product

(u\times (v\times w))_i=\varepsilon_{ijk} u_j (v\times w)_k=\varepsilon_{ijk}\varepsilon_{klm}u_j v_l w_m
=(\delta_{il}\delta_{jm}-\delta_{im}\delta_{jl})u_j v_l w_m=u_j v_i w_j-u_j v_j w_i=(u*w)v_i-(u*v)w_i

The tricky step is the one where I replaced two epsilons with some Kronecker deltas. The easiest way to see that this identity must hold is to explicitly calculate e.g. \varepsilon_{k12}\varepsilon_{k12} and \varepsilon_{k12}\varepsilon_{k13}. When you've done that, you'll probably understand.
 
Last edited:
Thanks... I don't know why I was thinking of tring to prove it for vectors outside of three space.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K