How to Prove Trigonometric Reduction Using Integration by Parts

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a trigonometric reduction formula using integration by parts, specifically for the integral of sine raised to the power of n. Participants are exploring the application of integration techniques within the context of high school calculus.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the use of integration by parts and consider the possibility of using mathematical induction. There are attempts to clarify the roles of u and dv in the integration process, with some questioning the appropriateness of the suggested approach given their current curriculum.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing their thoughts on the integration by parts method and the concept of induction. There is a recognition of differing educational backgrounds, which influences their understanding of the problem. No consensus has been reached, but various interpretations and suggestions are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the discussion is taking place within a high school calculus context, where proof by induction may not yet have been covered. This raises questions about the appropriateness of certain methods being suggested for the problem at hand.

JamesGregory
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove the following trigonometric reduction using integration by parts:
[tex] <br /> \int \sin^n x dx = - \frac{\ \sin^{n-1} x \cos x}{n} + \frac{\ n-1}{n} \int \sin^{n-2} x dx[/tex]

2. The attempt at a solution

I tried using integration by parts by breaking up sin^n x into sin^(n-2) x sin^2 x and sin^(n-1) x sin x but couldn't seem to get either to work. If someone could just provide a useful link as opposed to typing the whole proof, that would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you consider induction on n?
It's obvious that this is true when n= 1.

Assume the statement is true for sink x and use integration by parts on
[tex]\int sin^{k+1} xdx= \int sin x sin^k x dx[/itex]<br /> with u= cos x and dv= sin<sup>k</sup> dx.[/tex]
 
This is high school ap calculus ab, and I don't think we've gotten to induction, but I do think I see what you're getting at. but shouldn't u and dv be parts of the original integrand or am I missing something obvious?
 
Ahh yes I think Halls just typoed, but I he should mean u = sin x, and dv = sin^k x.
 
In my hs, we got induction method 2 yrs before integral calculus...
 
This is a high school class, you haven't done proof by induction, but you have done integration? Am I the only one who thinks that is backwards?
 
I was about to say that in my post as well, but seeing as Australia does about everything backwards maybe I didn't know what i was talking about. Though mathwonk always like to say how some of his Calculus students don't know basic algebra and how it appalls him. Something's seriously wrong with that education system.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K