How to reduce fermi-dirac to maxwell-boltzmann in a solid?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kof9595995
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fermi-dirac Solid
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the conditions under which Fermi-Dirac (FD) statistics can be reduced to Maxwell-Boltzmann (MB) statistics for atoms in solids. It establishes that while atoms in solids are typically treated as distinguishable due to their fixed positions, they remain indistinguishable in a strict quantum mechanical sense. The key point is that when the overlaps between wave functions are sufficiently small, the statistical mechanics of indistinguishable particles (FD) can approximate those of distinguishable particles (MB). The mathematical expressions for the partition functions of both statistics are provided to illustrate this relationship.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum statistics, specifically Fermi-Dirac and Maxwell-Boltzmann distributions.
  • Familiarity with wave function overlaps and their implications in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of statistical mechanics principles, including degeneracy and occupation numbers.
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical expressions related to statistical mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the derivation of the Fermi-Dirac distribution and its applications in solid-state physics.
  • Study the conditions under which quantum statistics transition from Fermi-Dirac to Maxwell-Boltzmann.
  • Explore the implications of wave function overlaps in quantum systems and their statistical treatments.
  • Examine case studies of dilute gases and their statistical mechanics to understand the transition to MB statistics.
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, quantum mechanics students, and researchers in solid-state physics who are interested in the statistical behavior of particles in solids and the transition between different statistical distributions.

kof9595995
Messages
676
Reaction score
2
For indistinguishable particles we use fermi-dirac(FD) or bose-einstein(BE), and for distinguishable we use maxwell-boltzmann(MB).For the distinguishable case our prof gave us the example of atoms in solid, because the positions of the atoms are fixed, so they are distinguishable, thus satisfy MB statistics.
But the so called "fixed" i think is just extremely narrow wave packets with very small overlaps, so in the strict sense atoms in solid are still indistinguishable, then how can we reduce FD or BE to MB, from the condition "wave packets are narrow with small overlaps".
Like in the treatment of dilute gas, when we assume the occupation number is much smaller than the number of degeneracies for each energy level, from the math FD and BE reduce to MB nicely. So it puzzled me whether for the atoms in solid we can find a nice way to reduce to MB.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, no reply for a long time...Maybe I did not state the question clear enough, let me try again:
For atoms in solid, the overlaps between wavefunctions are so small that we can treat them as distinguishable, hence the MB statistics.
But let's take a alternative point of view: atoms in solid are actually indistinguishable, so it's always correct to use FD statistics (let say they're fermions), but we said we could use MB because overlaps are small, which means that {\Omega _{MB}} \approx {\Omega _{FD}} when overlaps are small. So how do we get "{\Omega _{MB}} \approx {\Omega _{FD}}" from "overlaps are small"
For reference:
MB:{\Omega _{MB}} = \prod\limits_{j = 1}^n {\frac{{g_j^{{N_j}}}}{{{N_j}!}}}
FD:{\Omega _{FD}} = \prod\limits_{j = 1}^n {\frac{{{g_j}!}}{{{N_j}!\left( {{g_j} - {N_j}} \right)!}}}
Where gj is the degeneracy for different energies and Nj is the occupation number
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K