Strange maxwell boltzmann statistics, what is it actually?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application and interpretation of Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics, particularly in relation to energy levels in atoms versus gas particles. Participants explore the implications of these statistics in macroscopic systems and the transition from quantum to classical descriptions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the applicability of Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics to gas clouds, suggesting confusion over the analogy between atomic energy levels and gas particle distributions.
  • Another participant clarifies that Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics apply to macroscopic systems and that electrons in atoms follow quantum statistics, indicating a misunderstanding of the professor's explanation.
  • It is noted that Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics were developed before the understanding of atomic energy levels, emphasizing that they pertain to particles in thermodynamic equilibrium rather than discrete atomic states.
  • A further contribution explains that Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics can predict the distribution of particles among energy levels in a gas, linking it to solutions of the Schrödinger equation for confined particles.
  • Participants discuss the classical versus quantum mechanical interpretations of Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics, noting that classical results align with quantum predictions except at very low temperatures.
  • Suggestions for supplementary textbooks are provided to aid understanding of statistical mechanics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between atomic energy levels and Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics. While some assert that the two concepts are distinct, others explore the connections, indicating that the discussion remains unresolved.

Contextual Notes

There is uncertainty regarding the definitions and assumptions related to energy levels and their application in statistical mechanics. The discussion highlights the need for clarity on the transition from quantum to classical frameworks.

jessicaw
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
Originally, it is derived from the weight of a confuguration,i.e. how electrons are distributied in different energy level:n=gexp(a+be)
It gives the number of electrons in each energy level.However suddenly it can be apply to a cloud of gas?? By dividing a box of gas into different energy and see how many gas atoms in each energy. My professor said it is pseudo energy level in phase space.

So now an atom becomes a box of gas? Each energy level of atom becomes a division of a cloud of gas? Or am i missing anything(as i think the all gas atoms in the cloud of gas has the same energy)? I cannot find any rigorous proof of this analogy.

Help explaining this. My professor just runs away after each lecture so i do not have chance to ask her and we are all afraid of her. Also she does not use textbook and she teaches MB stat, boseeinstein stat, fermi dirac stat without any introduction on what does the distribution mean(to atom/ to gas),just a lot of equations and derivations and i do not know what to do now excpet memorizing.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
jessicaw said:
Originally, it is derived from the weight of a confuguration,i.e. how electrons are distributied in different energy level:n=gexp(a+be)
It gives the number of electrons in each energy level.
You have misunderstood your professor. Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics apply to macroscopic particle systems ie those containing a large number of particles whose interactions can be modeled without regard to quantum effects. The energy distribution of particles in such systems in thermodynamic equilibrium (eg. a gas) follows the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution.

An electron in an atom obeys quantum statistics. A single atom does not have a temperature. Energy levels in an atom obey quantum statistics not Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics.

AM
 
Andrew Mason said:
You have misunderstood your professor. Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics apply to macroscopic particle systems ie those containing a large number of particles whose interactions can be modeled without regard to quantum effects. The energy distribution of particles in such systems in thermodynamic equilibrium (eg. a gas) follows the Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution.

An electron in an atom obeys quantum statistics. A single atom does not have a temperature. Energy levels in an atom obey quantum statistics not Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics.

AM

But maxwell Boltzmann statistics is derived from energy level concept, right?
 
jessicaw said:
But maxwell Boltzmann statistics is derived from energy level concept, right?
No. Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics were developed long before anyone understood electrons in atoms. A Maxwell-Boltzmann distribution shows how energy is distributed among a large number of particles that are in thermodynamic equilibrium (such as a volume of gas). It has nothing to do with energy levels in an atom.

AM
 
Just to clarify, Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics can be used to predict, given a large number of atoms in thermal equilibrium (i.e. not just a single atom), what proportion will be in a given energy level (e.g. how many in the ground state, how many in the first excited state, etc.). This is what the formula you quoted in your original post means.

The idea when applying Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics to a container full of an ideal gas is that the relevant energy levels are those obtained by solving the time-independent Schrödinger equation for an atom confined inside the container. I presume if you're studying statistical mechanics you've probably done some basic quantum mechanics, so you'll be familiar with the energy levels for a particle in a one-dimensional box (if not, you can Google for "particle in a box"):

E_n = h^2 n^2/(8mL^2)

Thus, for gas atoms in a one-dimensional box, the probability that a given atom will be occupying the n-th state is proportional to \exp\left[-E_n/(k_B T)\right]. You can do the same kind of thing for a three-dimensional box, you just have to take into account the three possible degrees of freedom.

As was mentioned above, Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics was originally developed before quantum mechanics. The classical version of Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics involves predicting the distribution of atoms in a continuous phase space rather than discrete energy levels. Surprisingly enough (or maybe not -- quantum mechanics should reduce to classical mechanics in the appropriate limit, after all!) this calculation gives the exact same results as the quantum mechanical version except at extremely low temperatures where the discrete nature of the quantum energy levels becomes important (at such low temperatures, you should be using Fermi-Dirac or Bose-Einstein statistics rather than Maxwell-Boltzmann statistics anyway).

If you're looking for a textbook to supplement your lectures, I can only suggest the one that was used for the introductory thermodynamics/stat-mech course I took recently, which was Thermal Physics by Daniel Schroeder. It has a pretty gentle introduction to statistical mechanics at the end.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
6K