How to relate the Ehresmann connection to connection 1-form?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter xXEhresmannXx
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Connection
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between the Ehresmann connection and the connection 1-form in the context of abstract manifolds and vector bundles. Participants explore definitions, properties, and implications of these concepts, seeking clarification on how they interrelate.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant describes the Ehresmann connection as a distribution of vector spaces that completes the vertical space in the tangent space of the total space at each point, while another suggests it is more general than connections on vector bundles.
  • Connections on vector bundles are characterized as infinitesimal linear maps relating vector spaces at nearby points.
  • There is a question about whether the term "completing" or "complementing" is more accurate in defining the relationship between horizontal and vertical bundles in the context of the Ehresmann connection.
  • Another participant notes that the horizontal space at a point is the kernel of the connection 1-form, which maps the tangent space into the Lie algebra of the structure group.
  • The connection 1-form is described as a Lie algebra valued 1-form, not a number valued 1-form, and its invariance under the action of the structure group is highlighted as preserving horizontal spaces along fibers.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definitions and implications of the Ehresmann connection and connection 1-form, indicating that multiple competing interpretations remain. The discussion does not reach a consensus on these definitions.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the precise definitions of the terms used, particularly concerning the relationship between horizontal and vertical spaces, and the nature of the connection 1-form.

xXEhresmannXx
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am studying connections on abstract manifolds. So far, I have read several equivalent definitions but I can't establish the equivalence between them on my own.

The first definition is the Ehresmann connection that defines a connection on a manifold as a distribution of vector spaces completing the vertical space in the tangent space of the total space at each point.

The second definition defines a connection on a manifold as a covariant derivative, i.e. a map

∇:Γ(E)→Γ(T∗M⊗E)

where π:E→M is a vector bundle and there is a version of the Leibnitz rule as follows:

∇X(fs)=df⊗s+f⋅∇Xs

for any section s and f∈C∞(M).

I tried to write things in a chart to find out how the covariant derivation is induced from a given connection but I couldn't proceed forward. I think I haven't understood the definitions well. Would someone clarify how a distributional connection give us a connection one-form and how we can recover the horizontal space if we have a connection one-form?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
An Ehresmann connection is more general than a connection on a vector bundle. It's probably more useful to understand vector bundles first.

Connections on vector bundles can be thought of as infinitesimal linear maps that relate the vector space at a point ##x## to the vector space at neighboring points ##x + dx##.

Ehresmann connections are connections on general fiber bundles where the fiber is just some manifold, not necessarily with any sort of nice structure.
 
xXEhresmannXx said:
The first definition is the Ehresmann connection that defines a connection on a manifold as a distribution of vector spaces completing the vertical space in the tangent space of the total space at each point.
Did it actually say "completing", or did it say "complementing"? I had understood an (abstract) Ehresmann connection to be essentially a smooth subbundle ##H_M## of ##TTM##, called the horizontal bundle, which is complementary to the vertical bundle ##V_M## in ##TTM##. I.e., ##H_M \bigcap V_M = \{0\}##, and ##TTM = H_M \oplus V_M##.
I tried to write things in a chart to find out how the covariant derivation is induced from a given connection but I couldn't proceed forward. I think I haven't understood the definitions well.
I know the feeling. :confused:

Would someone clarify how a distributional connection give us a connection one-form and how we can recover the horizontal space if we have a connection one-form?
I could maybe say a few things in terms of coordinates on the bundle (which mathematicians would probably dislike). Depends what you're really looking for.
 
xXEhresmannXx said:
Would someone clarify how a distributional connection give us a connection one-form and how we can recover the horizontal space if we have a connection one-form?

- The horizontal space at a point is the kernel of the connection 1 form.

At each point in the fiber of a principal bundle, the tangent space is a direct sum of the vertical space and the horizontal space. The connection 1 form maps the tangent space into the Lie algebra of the the structure group. It does so by mapping the horizontal space to zero and the vertical space via the action of the structure group on the fiber.

Note that the connection 1 form is a Lie algebra valued 1 form not a number valued 1 form.

Also note the the invariance of the connection 1 form under the action of the structure group guarantees that the differential of the structure group preserves the horizontal spaces along each fiber.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
14K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K