How to show a parametric equation is continuous?

Click For Summary
A parametric equation r(t) is considered smoothly parametrized if its derivative is continuous and does not equal zero for all t in its domain. In the case of the tractrix r(t) = (t - tanh(t))i + sech(t)j, the derivative is calculated as r'(t) = (1 - sech(t))i + (-tanh(t)sech(t))j. Both sech(t) and tanh(t) are continuous for all real t, but at t = 0, r'(0) equals zero, indicating that r(t) is not smoothly parametrized at that point. Therefore, r(t) is smoothly parametrized for all t except t = 0. The discussion emphasizes the importance of analyzing the continuity of the components of the derivative to determine smooth parametrization.
WalkingInMud
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
A parametric equation, say r(t), is smoothly parametrized if:

1. its derivative is continuous, and
2. its derivative does not equal zero for all t in the domain of r.

Now that sounds simple enough. Now let's say we have the tractrix:

r(t) = (t-tanht)i + sechtj, ...

then r'(t) = [ 1/(1+x^2) ]i + [ tantsect ]j, right?


Now, without reverting to MatLab or Maple to view the graph, how do we mathematically explain that r'(t) is continuous (or not)?

Do I just state that is is/isn't -by inspection, or ...?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
WalkingInMud said:
A parametric equation, say r(t), is smoothly parametrized if:

1. its derivative is continuous, and
2. its derivative does not equal zero for all t in the domain of r.

Now that sounds simple enough. Now let's say we have the tractrix:

r(t) = (t-tanht)i + sechtj, ...

then r'(t) = [ 1/(1+x^2) ]i + [ tantsect ]j, right?
No, not right. r'(t)= [1- sech t]i- tanh t sech t j/b]. I don't know why you have changed to "x" in the first component but you surely should not have tan and sec rather than tanh and sech in the second component.


Now, without reverting to MatLab or Maple to view the graph, how do we mathematically explain that r'(t) is continuous (or not)?

Do I just state that is is/isn't -by inspection, or ...?
A vector valued function is continuous if and only if its components are continuous. Where are sech t and tanh t continuous?
 
How does this look?

r(t)=(t-tanht)i+(secht)j ...so
r'(t)=(1-secht)i+(-tanhtsecht)j

Now, secht is continuous for all real t, and also
tanht is continuous for all real t, BUT...

since tanh(0)=0 i.e. (-tanhtsecht)=0 for t=0, and furthermore sech(0)=1 i.e. (1-secht)=0 for t=0,

...r'(0)=0 so r(t) is smoothly parametrized for all t NOT EQUAL TO 0

Is this OK?
 
WalkingInMud said:
r(t)=(t-tanht)i+(secht)j ...so
r'(t)=(1-secht)i+(-tanhtsecht)j

Now, secht is continuous for all real t, and also
tanht is continuous for all real t, BUT...

since tanh(0)=0 i.e. (-tanhtsecht)=0 for t=0, and furthermore sech(0)=1 i.e. (1-secht)=0 for t=0,

...r'(0)=0 so r(t) is smoothly parametrized for all t NOT EQUAL TO 0

Is this OK?
Yes, that is correct. And if you look at the graph of the tractrix, you can see what happens at t= 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K