How to show a wave function satisfies the shrodinger eqn

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around whether a wavefunction that is a linear combination of two energy eigenstates satisfies the time-independent Schrödinger equation. Participants explore the implications of the eigenvalue equation for the Hamiltonian operator and how it relates to the wavefunction of a state.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the definition and implications of a linear combination of energy eigenstates and how to apply the Hamiltonian operator to such states. There is a focus on whether the resulting wavefunction can satisfy the time-independent Schrödinger equation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of the problem. Some have provided insights into the relationship between linear combinations of eigenstates and the eigenvalue equation, while others express uncertainty about the implications of their findings.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions and properties of energy eigenstates and the conditions under which a linear combination of such states can be considered an eigenstate itself. There is mention of specific cases, such as degenerate states, that may influence the outcome.

richyw
Messages
179
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



If a state is a linear combination of two energy eigenstates, does its wavefunction satisfy the time independent shrodinger equation? I guess in general, how would I show if the wavefunctions of a state does or does not satisfy the time-independent Schrödinger equation?

Homework Equations



[tex]H\left| E \right\rangle=E\left|E\right\rangle[/tex]
[tex]\psi_\alpha(x)=\left\langle x |\alpha\right\rangle[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Honestly have no idea what to do.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
to start with, what is the time-independent Schrödinger equation?
 
BruceW said:
to start with, what is the time-independent Schrödinger equation?

[tex]H\left| E \right\rangle=E\left|E\right\rangle[/tex]
 
richyw said:

Homework Statement



If a state is a linear combination of two energy eigenstates, does its wavefunction satisfy the time independent shrodinger equation? I guess in general, how would I show if the wavefunctions of a state does or does not satisfy the time-independent Schrödinger equation?

Homework Equations



[tex]H\left| E \right\rangle=E\left|E\right\rangle[/tex]
[tex]\psi_\alpha(x)=\left\langle x |\alpha\right\rangle[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



Honestly have no idea what to do.

Okay, first of all, by analogy with eigenvectors/values, an energy eigenstate is just a state (wavefunction) for which this is true: when you apply the Hamiltonian operator to it, you just get a constant (the eigenvalue, E) multiplied by it. So, if |E> is an energy eigenstate, then:$$H|E\rangle = E|E\rangle$$So energy eigenstates are states that satisfy the time-independent Schrödinger equation (which is the eigenvalue equation for the Hamiltonian).

Now, suppose we have two such eigenstates ##|E_1\rangle## and ##|E_2\rangle##. Since they are energy eigenstates, they must each separately satisfy the eigenvalue equation. So: ##H|E_1\rangle = E|E_1\rangle## AND ##H|E_2\rangle = E|E_2\rangle##

Now suppose we have a more general state ##|\psi\rangle## that is a linear combination of ##|E_1\rangle## and ##|E_2\rangle##:$$|\psi\rangle = \textrm{some combination of}~|E_1\rangle~\textrm{and}~|E_2\rangle$$What does it mean for psi to be a linear combination of the two eigenstates? I.e. what is a linear combination? I.e. can you fill in the right-hand side of the above equation?

Based on your answer to the above, what happens when you apply the Hamiltonian operator to psi? ##H|\psi\rangle =~?##
 
cepheid said:
What does it mean for psi to be a linear combination of the two eigenstates? I.e. what is a linear combination? I.e. can you fill in the right-hand side of the above equation?

ok if I have two states [itex]\left| a\right\rangle[/itex] and [itex]\left| b\right\rangle[/itex] and they are energy eigenstates with energies [itex]E_a[/itex] and [itex]E_b[/itex], then a general linear combination of these states would be [tex]\left| \psi \right \rangle = c_1\left| a\right\rangle+c_2\left| b\right\rangle[/tex]
 
so if I wanted to show that the wavefunction [itex]\phi(x)=\left\langle x|\psi\right\rangle[/itex] satisfied the SE, how would I do this, and how would I find its eigenvalue?
 
(in response to post 5) yep. so does psi satisfy the time-independent Schrödinger equation? i.e. what happens when you use the Hamiltonian operator on psi?
 
richyw said:
ok if I have two states [itex]\left| a\right\rangle[/itex] and [itex]\left| b\right\rangle[/itex] and they are energy eigenstates with energies [itex]E_a[/itex] and [itex]E_b[/itex], then a general linear combination of these states would be [tex]\left| \psi \right \rangle = c_1\left| a\right\rangle+c_2\left| b\right\rangle[/tex]

Yeah, that's right. That is a linear combination. So what happens when you apply H to this state? Remember that H is a linear operator.
 
[tex]H\left| \psi \right \rangle = H\left( c_1\left| a\right\rangle+c_2\left| b\right\rangle\right)[/tex]
[tex]H\left| \psi \right \rangle = c_1 H\left| a\right\rangle+c_2H\left| b\right\rangle[/tex]
[tex]H\left| \psi \right \rangle = c_1 E_1\left| a\right\rangle+c_2E_2\left| b\right\rangle[/tex]
 
  • #10
the part that is really messing me up is the "wave equation" part.
 
  • #11
yep nice. so is this the same as the time-independent Schrödinger equation for the state psi?
 
  • #12
I guess?
 
  • #13
you said the time-independent Schrödinger is ##H|E\rangle = E|E\rangle## and for your situation, you have the state psi, so does psi fit this equation?
 
  • #14
I have no idea.
 
  • #15
richyw said:
I have no idea.

What BruceW is saying is that for psi to satisfy the time-independent Schrödinger equation, it would have to be true that ##H|\psi\rangle = E|\psi\rangle## where E is *some constant.* Look at your above result for ##H|\psi\rangle##. Is it equal to "some constant" multiplied by psi?
 
  • #16
cepheid said:
What BruceW is saying is that for psi to satisfy the time-independent Schrödinger equation, it would have to be true that ##H|\psi\rangle = E|\psi\rangle## where E is *some constant.* Look at your above result for ##H|\psi\rangle##. Is it equal to "some constant" multiplied by psi?

no? I don't think it is?
 
  • #17
richyw said:
no? I don't think it is?

The answer is indeed no. But why aren't you sure about your answer? This is math after all, there is a definite answer. So don't guess, do the algebra. Take your psi and multiply it by some constant C (or E, or whatever). Is this the same as what you got for H|psi>?
 
  • #18
are there any cases where it would be though? like what if one of the constants is imaginary, or if the two constants are equal?
 
  • #19
Use a more physical argument to motivate your answer: eigenstates (of the Hamiltonian) are states of definite energy. So if the particle is in an eigenstate, a measurement of its energy is sure to yield the same answer always. But if the particle is in a linear combination of two eigenstates, can this wavefunction psi tell you with certainty what the energy will be, or can it only tell you about the probability of measuring a given value? Based on that, would you expect the linear combination of two eigenstates to also be an eigenstate, or not?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #20
richyw said:
are there any cases where it would be though? like what if one of the constants is imaginary, or if the two constants are equal?

If the constants are equal (i.e. two distinct states have the same value -- they are said to be degenerate states), then yes, it would work. Their linear combination would also be an eigenstate with that same energy.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
716
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K