How to show functions are linearly dependent?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mikehibbert
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Linearly
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the linear dependence of a set of functions: x^2, 3x+2, x-1, and 2x+5. Participants are exploring how to show that these functions are linearly dependent by finding constants that satisfy a specific equation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to express the functions in a linear combination that equals zero, questioning how to find appropriate constants. Some suggest grouping terms by powers of x and forming equations based on coefficients.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing with participants sharing their attempts to set up equations based on the linear combination. There is recognition that multiple equations exist for fewer unknowns, leading to speculation about nontrivial solutions. Some participants express uncertainty about needing to find specific values for the constants.

Contextual Notes

There is a concern about the number of equations relative to the number of unknowns, which may affect the ability to find a solution. The use of the Wronskian is mentioned, but its effectiveness in this context is questioned.

mikehibbert
Messages
37
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the set of functions:

x^2
3x+2
x-1
2x+5

are linearly dependent.

Homework Equations



-

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that you have to show that you can put constants in front of each equation (that aren't all zero) such that:

c1y1 + c2y2 + c3y3 + c4y4 = 0

i.e. c1(x^2) + c2(3x+2) + c3(x-1) + c4(2x-5) =0

But I have no idea how to do this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
work out c1(x^2) + c2(3x+2) + c3(x-1) + c4(2x-5) =0

by grouping all the same factors of x, ie:

c1x^2 = 0
(3 c2 + c3 + 2 c4)x = 0
... = 0

and figure out what set of constants makes all of these equations true, can you do that?
 
i'm struggling i must admit :S

this would give me:

(c1)x^2 = 0
(3c2 + c3 + 2c4)x = 0
(2c2 + c3 + 5c4) =0

yes?
 
mikehibbert said:
i'm struggling i must admit :S

this would give me:

(c1)x^2 = 0
(3c2 + c3 + 2c4)x = 0
(2c2 + c3 + 5c4) =0

yes?
Yes. From above, it's clear that c1 = 0, but since you have two more equations in three unknowns (c2, c3, c4) it's pretty likely you're going to get a whole lot of nonzero solutions for these constants.
 
but do you think i have to find the values of the constants?

surely it's impossible? because I have three unknowns - I need three equations?
 
Therefore what? If the coefficients are nopt all 0, then the functions are dependent!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I used a wronskian in the end!
 
mikehibbert said:
I used a wronskian in the end!

That's like going after a housefly with a bulldozer! It would have been much simpler to just solve this system algebraically:
(c1)x^2 = 0
(3c2 + c3 + 2c4)x = 0
(2c2 + c3 + 5c4) =0
 
but i still can't see how that proves it?

and i needed the marks, so overkill it was :P
 
  • #10
The functions x^2, 3x+2, x-1, and 2x+5 are linearly dependent iff the equation c1x^2 + c2 (3x+2) + c3 (x-1) + c4(2x+5) = 0 has a nontrivial solution. I.e., at least one of the constants ci is nonzero.

You were well on your way to establishing this with this set of equations:
(c1)x^2 = 0
(3c2 + c3 + 2c4)x = 0
(2c2 + c3 + 5c4) =0

I guarantee you, if you can't find a solution to this system (and there are lots of them), you will have a difficult time of it, and knowledge of how to apply the Wronskian will be of little help to you. Guaranteed.
Mark
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K