MHB How to Simplify f(3a-4) for the Function f(x)=-4x+5?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monk1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simplify
Monk1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Let f(x)=-4x+5. Find and simplify f(3a-4)

I have the answer, but I don't know how to get there.
Missed it on a test.
Answer= = -12a+21
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Monk said:
Let f(x)=-4x+5. Find and simplify f(3a-4)
When you are asked to find $f(3a-4)$, it means that you have to substitute $3a-4$ for every occurrence of $x$ in the definition of $f(x)$. The definition (i.e., the right-hand side) of $f(x)$ is $-4x+5$. It has a single occurrence of $x$. This occurrence must be replaced by $3a-4$. Thus, the result of substitution is $-4(3a-4)+5$. The remaining step is simplification. Here you have to "multiply through", i.e., apply distributivity of multiplication over addition. The expression becomes $-4\cdot(3a)-4\cdot(-4)+5$, which simplifies to $-12a+16+5=-12a+21$.

I have not played modern games, but if I am right, substitution is similar to engaging a portal. The definition like $f(x)=-4x+5$ is a portal with entry $x$ on the left-hand side and exit $x$ on the right-hand side. Applying $f(x)$ to $3a-4$ is similar to throwing $3a-4$ into the portal, so it appears unchanged at the exit. Note that even though $x$ appears once on the left-hand side of the definition of $f$, it may appear several or zero times at the right-hand side, i.e., the portal may have several or zero exits.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top