MHB How to Simplify f(3a-4) for the Function f(x)=-4x+5?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Monk1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Simplify
AI Thread Summary
To simplify f(3a-4) for the function f(x)=-4x+5, substitute 3a-4 for x in the function definition. This results in the expression -4(3a-4)+5. Applying distributive property, the expression simplifies to -12a+16+5. The final simplified result is -12a+21. The discussion also draws an analogy between substitution and engaging a portal, emphasizing the concept of input and output in function definitions.
Monk1
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Let f(x)=-4x+5. Find and simplify f(3a-4)

I have the answer, but I don't know how to get there.
Missed it on a test.
Answer= = -12a+21
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Monk said:
Let f(x)=-4x+5. Find and simplify f(3a-4)
When you are asked to find $f(3a-4)$, it means that you have to substitute $3a-4$ for every occurrence of $x$ in the definition of $f(x)$. The definition (i.e., the right-hand side) of $f(x)$ is $-4x+5$. It has a single occurrence of $x$. This occurrence must be replaced by $3a-4$. Thus, the result of substitution is $-4(3a-4)+5$. The remaining step is simplification. Here you have to "multiply through", i.e., apply distributivity of multiplication over addition. The expression becomes $-4\cdot(3a)-4\cdot(-4)+5$, which simplifies to $-12a+16+5=-12a+21$.

I have not played modern games, but if I am right, substitution is similar to engaging a portal. The definition like $f(x)=-4x+5$ is a portal with entry $x$ on the left-hand side and exit $x$ on the right-hand side. Applying $f(x)$ to $3a-4$ is similar to throwing $3a-4$ into the portal, so it appears unchanged at the exit. Note that even though $x$ appears once on the left-hand side of the definition of $f$, it may appear several or zero times at the right-hand side, i.e., the portal may have several or zero exits.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top