How to simulate an isotope shift measurement

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on simulating isotope shift measurements to determine the uncertainty required for transition frequencies in the context of new physics parameters, specifically ##\alpha_{NP}##. The user proposes generating data using equation 5 and applying error propagation techniques from equation 9 to establish an upper bound on ##\alpha_{NP}##. The conversation highlights the importance of calculating derivatives of ##\frac{\partial \alpha_{NP}}{\partial \nu_i}## and suggests using Monte Carlo simulations to introduce measurement noise for more accurate results. The goal is to derive the necessary uncertainty on transition frequencies based on the desired sensitivity for ##\alpha_{NP}##.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of King plot non-linearities
  • Familiarity with error propagation techniques
  • Knowledge of Monte Carlo simulation methods
  • Proficiency in deriving equations related to isotope shifts
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of error propagation in physics experiments
  • Learn how to implement Monte Carlo simulations for uncertainty analysis
  • Explore the mathematical derivation of isotope shift equations
  • Investigate the implications of non-zero values for new physics parameters
USEFUL FOR

Researchers in experimental physics, particularly those involved in isotope shift measurements, theoretical physicists exploring new physics parameters, and data analysts working with Monte Carlo simulations in scientific research.

Malamala
Messages
348
Reaction score
28
Hello! My questions are based on this paper talking about King plot non-linearities. Assuming I have 3 isotopes and 2 transitions, I would like to know how well I should measure the transitions (i.e. what uncertainty on the transition value) in order to reach a given sensitivity for the new physics parameter. What I am thinking of doing is to generate data using equation 5 (i.e. without any new physics, assuming I know the masses and changes in charge radii), which of course if I plug in equation 9 will give me ##\alpha_{NP} = 0##. However, even if ##\alpha_{NP} = 0##, I can still use the error propagation mentioned below equation 9 to get the error on ##\alpha_{NP}##. So basically I will get ##\alpha_{NP} = 0 \pm d\alpha_{NP}## and from here I can set an upper bound on ##\alpha_{NP} < d\alpha_{NP}## at 1 sigma level. And based on the value of ##d\alpha_{NP}## I am aiming for, I can get the needed uncertainty on the transitions frequencies. However, in practice, ##\alpha_{NP}## won't be zero. It will be smaller than ##d\alpha_{NP}##, but not zero and the upper limit will be ##\alpha_{NP} + d\alpha_{NP}##, which in principle can be up to 2 times bigger than ##d\alpha_{NP}## alone. Given that I know what upper bound I aim for, how can I get the needed uncertainty on the transitions in this general case? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not clear to me why you will need a simulation to do this calculation. If you assume a non-zero value of ##\alpha_{NP}##, don't you just need to calculate the derivatives of ##\frac{\partial \alpha_{NP}}{\partial \nu_i}## for ##i = 1,2## being the two transition frequencies, and perform standard propagation of error?

Alternatively, for more accuracy, just run a simple monte carlo. Some algebra will let you derive an expression like ##\nu_2 = f(\nu_1,\alpha_{NP})## by solving the equation for ##\alpha_{NP}## for ##\nu_2##. Then introduce some measurement noise by adding uncorrelated random numbers to both ##\nu_1## and ##\nu_2##, with equal variance (assuming you measure both transitions with equal uncertainty). Then just find the scatter on your observed values of ##\alpha_{NP}##. Was that clear?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BillKet

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
968
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K