MHB How to Solve an Equation with Square Roots?

AI Thread Summary
To solve the equation \(\sqrt{x}+\sqrt{x+8}=8\), first rearrange it to \(\sqrt{x+8}=8-\sqrt{x}\). Squaring both sides gives \(x+8=64-16\sqrt{x}+x\), leading to the equation \(16\sqrt{x}=56\). Dividing by 8 simplifies this to \(2\sqrt{x}=7\), resulting in \(\sqrt{x}=\frac{7}{2}\) and \(x=\frac{49}{4}\). Verification shows that this solution satisfies the original equation.
magda21
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Please Help me solve it \[ \sqrt{x}+\sqrt{x+8}=8 \] thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hello, and welcome to MHB! :)

I would begin by arranging as follows:

$$\sqrt{x+8}=8-\sqrt{x}$$

I really just want to arrange it so that there isn't two radicals on the same side. Now, what do you get when you square both sides?
 
x+8=64-x
2x=56
x=28
what I'm doing wrong?
 
Ah, you are not squaring the RHS correctly. Let's go back to:

$$\sqrt{x+8}=8-\sqrt{x}$$

Now, recall that:

$$(a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2$$

And so, when we square both sides of our equation (bearing in mind that we must check for extraneous solutions), we get:

$$x+8=64-16\sqrt{x}+x$$

Collecting like terms, we can arrange this as:

$$16\sqrt{x}=56$$

Divide through by 8:

$$2\sqrt{x}=7$$

Can you proceed?
 
\[ \sqrt{x}=\frac{7}{2} \]
x=\frac{49}{4}
I see, thank you so much
 
Yes, and once we verifiy is works in the original equation, which it does, then we're done. :)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top