How to Solve Complex Integrals: Understanding the Process?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter MurraySt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Complex Integrals
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving complex integrals, focusing on specific integrals and the application of complex analysis techniques. Participants explore various methods, including the Cauchy Integral formula and properties of holomorphic functions, while addressing specific integrals and their evaluations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant proposes that the integral of 1/(z-1/2) over a closed disk results in 2πi, referencing the Cauchy Integral formula.
  • Another participant suggests that for the integral of dt/(2 + sint), one must find a complex function that relates to the integral over a circle.
  • There is a discussion about the implications of a negatively oriented curve on the final answer of an integral, with one participant confirming that it results in negating the answer.
  • A participant questions the factorization of a quadratic denominator, expressing concern about not retrieving a z term when applying the roots found using the quadratic formula.
  • Another participant reassures that the denominator can be expressed as a product of its roots, aligning with general factorization principles.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the application of the Cauchy Integral formula and the properties of holomorphic functions, but there are unresolved questions regarding specific integrals and the implications of curve orientation. The discussion remains open with multiple viewpoints on certain aspects.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the correct application of complex integral techniques and the implications of curve orientation, indicating a need for further clarification on these topics.

MurraySt
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
I'm integrating 1/(z-1/2) over the closed disk w/ radius = 3 centered at 0.

I've seen other problems where the final answer was i2pi times f(w) - here w =1/2.

Since f(z) is equal to 1. Is the final answer just i2pi?

Next up:

I have the integral of dt/(2 + sint) the problem then tells me expand sin to its complex definition and replace e^it with z. My question is what does dt become?Lastly:

I'm given the integral zexp(z^2). I'm asked to provide a proof for why it equals zero on any closed curve gamma.

Do I simply perform a u sub (u=z^2, du=2zdz) and then say that since e^u is entire and thus holomorphic on any region (or curve) it is equal to 0?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi MurraySt! :smile:

The answer to your first question is indeed [itex]2\pi i[/itex], but you might want to give a more rigourous reason for this. Maybe the Cauchy Integral formula.

For the second question, consider [itex]\gamma[/itex] the circle of radius 1, thus [itex]\gamma(t)=e^{it}[/itex] You must find a complex function such that

[tex]\int_\gamma{f(z)dz}=\int_0^{2\pi}{\frac{dt}{2+\sin(t)}}[/tex]

(I just guessed the limits, as you did not provide any). So using the definition of the complex integral, you must find f such that

[tex]\int_0^{2\pi}{f(e^{it})ie^{it}dt} = \int_0^{2\pi}{\frac{dt}{2+\sin(t)}}[/tex]

Regarding the third question. Can't you just say that [itex]ze^{z^2}[/itex] is holomorphic on [itex]\mathbb{C}[/itex] and thus any integral is 0.
 
As a quick follow-up: If my curve is oriented negatively (clockwise) how does this affect my final answer? Do I simple negate it?
 
MurraySt said:
As a quick follow-up: If my curve is oriented negatively (clockwise) how does this affect my final answer? Do I simple negate it?

Yes! :smile:
 
So sorry to bother you one final question:

The denominator of my problem is z^2 +4iz -1. I used the quadratic equation to get the answers i(-2+rad3) and i(-2-rad3).

Does my denominator simply become the product of the roots? It scares me that I don't get back any z.

Thanks as always for your help!
 
MurraySt said:
So sorry to bother you one final question:

The denominator of my problem is z^2 +4iz -1. I used the quadratic equation to get the answers i(-2+rad3) and i(-2-rad3).

Does my denominator simply become the product of the roots? It scares me that I don't get back any z.

Thanks as always for your help!

Well, you're scared for the right reason! In general, if we have

[tex]az^2+bz+c[/tex]

and if we have roots [itex]\xi_1,\xi_2[/itex], then we can factor it as

[tex]az^2+bz+c=a(z-\xi_1)(z-\xi_2)[/tex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K