Cauchy Integral Formula with a singularity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of the Cauchy Integral Formula for a holomorphic function that has singularities. Participants explore the function $$f(z)=\frac{z}{e^z-i}$$, which is holomorphic except at specific points $$z_n=i\pi/2+2ni\pi$$. The focus is on evaluating the integral formula at a point $$z_0=i$$ and the implications of singularities on this evaluation.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions how to apply the integral formula given the singularities of the function.
  • Another suggests calculating the Laurent series around the singularity and discusses the Taylor series expansion of $$e^z-i$$.
  • There is a proposal to evaluate the Taylor series at the singularity $$z=i$$.
  • Participants discuss the necessity of selecting a singularity to start the series expansion.
  • Concerns are raised about the correctness of the long division method used in calculating the series.
  • One participant asserts that the integral formula applies only when $$z_0$$ is a pole of $$f(z)$$, noting that the function does not have residues at the evaluated point.
  • Another participant provides a detailed calculation of the Laurent series, emphasizing the absence of negative power terms.
  • There is a question about reconciling the calculated Laurent series with results from external sources like WolframAlpha.
  • A later reply reiterates the conditions under which Cauchy's integral formula holds, emphasizing the need for an appropriate contour that does not encircle any singularities.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the application of the integral formula and the nature of singularities, with no consensus reached on the correct approach to evaluating the integral at $$z_0=i$$.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on the choice of contour for the integral and the unresolved nature of the Laurent series calculations. The discussion also highlights the complexity of determining the behavior of the function around its singularities.

cbarker1
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
345
Reaction score
23
Dear Everyone,

I am wondering how to use the integral formula for a holomorphic function at all points except a point that does not exist in function's analyticity. For instance, Let f be defined as $$f(z)=\frac{z}{e^z-i}$$. F is holomorphic everywhere except for $$z_n=i\pi/2+2ni\pi$$ for all n in the integers. Let curve C be closed positively oriented simple curve. $$f(z_0)=\frac{1}{2i\pi}\int_C\frac{f(z)}{z-z_0}dz$$, I want to find $$z_0=i$$, if it is possible.Thanks,

Cbarker1
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think the standard thing to do is calculate the Laurent series of the function. The standard way to do this if I remember correctly is to write out the Taylor series of ##e^z-i## in a small neighborhood around the singularity, factor out all the multiples of ##z##, and then use the Taylor series expansion of ##\frac{1}{1+z}## where z is actually going to be your remaining infinite series. Have you seen this kind of thing done before?

I encourage you to try it, get as far as you can, and then post what you have here.
 
Would the center of taylor series be at z=i?
 
You want to calculate it at the singularities you calculated. Just pick one to start.
 
ok. I would pick the z=ipi/2.
 
So far, the Taylor series is the following:
##f(z)=i\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(z-\frac{i\pi}{2})^n}{n!}##
 
Last edited:
I think the sum starts at n=0.

Now try putting that in the denominator. You should be able to pull out a factor of ##(z-\frac{i\pi}{2}##. Then you'll be left with a holomorphic function that you need for the theorem.
 
when n=0, the ##a_0=0##, because ##f(\frac{i\pi}{2})=e^{\frac{i\pi}{2}}-i=0##.
 
Oh, sure. Sorry for some reason I was thinking you were writing the Taylor series down just for ##e^z##.

Anyway, just write out the function with that in the denominator, and factor out ##z-i\pi/2## from the denominator. Then you should have your integrand in the right form.
 
  • #10
I am thinking that I am doing the long division wrong.

1|i(z-ipi/2)/1!+...
 
  • #11
Here is the function's series so far: $$\frac{1}{f(z)}=\frac{i}{(z-\frac{i\pi}{2})}-\frac{i}{2!}-\frac{i(z-\frac{i\pi}{2})}{2!^2}+\dots$$
 
  • #12
See if you can understand why this is true given what you've written. Do you see how to evaluate a line integral around the singularity from here?

$$\frac{z}{e^z-i} =\frac{1}{z-\frac{i\pi}{2}} \frac{z}{i\sum_{n=1}^\infty \frac{(z-\frac{i\pi}{2})^{n-1}}{n!}}$$
 
  • #13
I would say the summation part of the function, right?
 
  • #14
Can you say what the ##f(z)## in cauchy's integral formula is? Can you evaluate it at ##\frac{i\pi}{2}##?
 
  • #15
F(z) is the z/ the sum.
 
  • #16
Ok. So can you evaluate the integral?
 
  • #17
##f(z_0)=i\pi/4##, I think.
 
  • #18
cbarker1 said:
$$f(z_0)=\frac{1}{2i\pi}\int_C\frac{f(z)}{z-z_0}dz$$,
This integral only applies when ##z_0## is a pole of ##f(z)## and not an essential singularity. The residue theorem doesn't apply for your function. The coefficients of the negative power of z terms in the Laurent expansion give the residues for the polar order. Your function gives ##f(0)=0##, therefore the Laurent expansion can have no negative powers of z terms and thus no poles with residues of any order. Your function doesn't resonate; it's just a short circuit.
 
  • #19
Fred Wright said:
Your function doesn't resonate; it's just a short circuit.
π/(2 (z - (i π)/2)) + (-π/4 + -i) + 1/24 (π + 12 i) (z - (i π)/2) - 1/12 i (z - (i π)/2)^2 - (π (z - (i π)/2)^3)/1440 + 1/720 i (z - (i π)/2)^4 + O((z - (i π)/2)^5)
I know that the function is not define at that point. I want to sure that I know that how the pi/2 in the first negative power came to be.
 
  • #20
cbarker1 said:
π/(2 (z - (i π)/2)) + (-π/4 + -i) + 1/24 (π + 12 i) (z - (i π)/2) - 1/12 i (z - (i π)/2)^2 - (π (z - (i π)/2)^3)/1440 + 1/720 i (z - (i π)/2)^4 + O((z - (i π)/2)^5)
I know that the function is not define at that point. I want to sure that I know that how the pi/2 in the first negative power came to be.
You made a mistake in calculating the Laurent series. Let's calculate it by long division:
$$f(z)=\frac{z}{(e^z-i)}=\frac{iz}{(1-e^{(z-\frac{i\pi}{2}-2\pi i n)})}$$We make the substitution ##z'=z-\frac{i\pi}{2}-2\pi i n## and revert back after the calculation of the Laurent series.$$f(z')=\frac{-i(z'+\frac{i\pi}{2}+2\pi i n)}{z' + \frac{z'^2}{2!} + \frac{z'^3}{3!} + \frac{z'^4}{4!} +...}$$We calculate by long division,$$\frac{1}{z' + \frac{z'^2}{2!} + \frac{z'^3}{3!} + \frac{z'^4}{4!} +...}=\frac{1}{z'}-\frac{1}{2}+\frac{z'}{12}-...$$Reverting back to ##z'## we find$$f(z)= \frac{iz}{(z-\frac{i\pi}{2}-2\pi i n )} + iz(\frac{1}{2}-\frac{1}{12}(\frac{i\pi}{2}+2\pi i n)) + \frac{iz^2}{12} + ...$$ Thus the Laurent series has no ##\frac{1}{z}## terms and ##f(0)=0##.
 
  • #21
So how do we get the value for the Laurent series as given in the wolfromalpha?
 
  • #22
cbarker1 said:
Dear Everyone,

I am wondering how to use the integral formula for a holomorphic function at all points except a point that does not exist in function's analyticity. For instance, Let f be defined as $$f(z)=\frac{z}{e^z-i}$$. F is holomorphic everywhere except for $$z_n=i\pi/2+2ni\pi$$ for all n in the integers. Let curve C be closed positively oriented simple curve. $$f(z_0)=\frac{1}{2i\pi}\int_C\frac{f(z)}{z-z_0}dz$$, I want to find $$z_0=i$$, if it is possible.Thanks,

Cbarker1
Note that Cauchy's integral formula holds when ##f(z)## is holomorphic everywhere inside and on the contour ##C##. So in your case, it will hold for ##z_0=i## only if ##C## encircles ##z=i## but does not encircle any of the singularities of ##f##. Besides selecting an appropriate contour ##C##, it isn't clear to me what you mean when you ask how to "use" the integral formula. What are you trying to do?

jason
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K