How to Solve Coulomb's Law Question 1: Calculating Net Force | Physics Problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter Potatochip911
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Coulomb's law Law
Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on solving a Coulomb's Law problem to calculate the net force acting on charge 3. The initial attempts involved using both magnitude and directional components, but both methods yielded incorrect expressions. Key corrections included using the correct charge values and ensuring the proper application of variables in the equations. After adjustments, the expression for the net force was refined, leading to a correct formulation. The participant also noted an error in their derivative calculation when determining the maximum force.
Potatochip911
Messages
317
Reaction score
3
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known }data
The picture I drew is quite sad but it's the best I could do lol.
102ti87.png

I forgot to mention in the image that it's the magnitude of the net force we're looking for.

Homework Equations


##|F_{12}|=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{|q_1||q_2|}{(R_{12})^2}##

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried solving it 2 ways and both have failed. The first method I tried was to ignore directional vectors since the y components cancel out in this example.
##F_{3}=F_{13}+F_{23}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{|q_1||q_3|}{(R_{13})^2}+\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{|q_2||q_3|}{(R_{23})^2}## ; Then since the hypotenuse of both triangles is the same we have ##R_{13}=R_{23}##; ##R_{13}=\sqrt{x^2+d^2}## and since ##q_1=q_2## we have $$F_{3}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{2|q_1||q_2|}{(R_{13})^2}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{2|q_1||q_2|}{x^2+d^2}$$
Unfortunately this isn't the correct expression, I also tried solving it with x and y components instead of magnitudes:
##F_3=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}[\frac{|q_1||q_2|\cos\theta(+\hat{\imath})}{(R_{13})^2}+\frac{|q_1||q_2|\sin\theta(-\hat{\jmath})}{(R_{13})^2}]+\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}[\frac{|q_2||q_3|\cos\theta(+\hat{\imath})}{(R_{23})^2}+\frac{|q_2||q_3|\sin\theta(+\hat{\jmath})}{(R_{23})^2}]## which after simplifying leads to the expression $$F_3=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}[\frac{2|q_1||q_3|\cos\theta}{(x^2+d^2)}]$$ which also isn't the correct expression even after substituting ##\cos\theta=\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+d^2}}##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Potatochip911 said:
1. The problem statement, all variables and given/known }data
The picture I drew is quite sad but it's the best I could do lol.
102ti87.png

I forgot to mention in the image that it's the magnitude of the net force we're looking for.

Homework Equations


##|F_{12}|=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{|q_1||q_2|}{(R_{12})^2}##

The Attempt at a Solution


I've tried solving it 2 ways and both have failed. The first method I tried was to ignore directional vectors since the y components cancel out in this example.
##F_{3}=F_{13}+F_{23}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{|q_1||q_3|}{(R_{13})^2}+\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{|q_2||q_3|}{(R_{23})^2}## ; Then since the hypotenuse of both triangles is the same we have ##R_{13}=R_{23}##; ##R_{13}=\sqrt{x^2+d^2}## and since ##q_1=q_2## we have $$F_{3}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{2|q_1||q_2|}{(R_{13})^2}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}\frac{2|q_1||q_2|}{x^2+d^2}$$
That is wrong, naturally.
Potatochip911 said:
Unfortunately this isn't the correct expression, I also tried solving it with x and y components instead of magnitudes:
##F_3=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}[\frac{|q_1||q_2|\cos\theta(+\hat{\imath})}{(R_{13})^2}+\frac{|q_1||q_2|\sin\theta(-\hat{\jmath})}{(R_{13})^2}]+\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}[\frac{|q_2||q_3|\cos\theta(+\hat{\imath})}{(R_{23})^2}+\frac{|q_2||q_3|\sin\theta(+\hat{\jmath})}{(R_{23})^2}]## which after simplifying leads to the expression $$F_3=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon_0}[\frac{2|q_1||q_3|\cos\theta}{(x^2+d^2)}]$$ which also isn't the correct expression even after substituting ##\cos\theta=\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+d^2}}##
Use the value of the charge when you calculate the Coulomb force, not the absolute value.
You want the force acting on charge 3, but you used q1 q2 in your first two terms.
By the way, where is x=0?
 
  • Like
Likes Potatochip911
ehild said:
That is wrong, naturally.

Use the value of the charge when you calculate the Coulomb force, not the absolute value.
You want the force acting on charge 3, but you used q1 q2 in your first two terms.
By the way, where is x=0?
Okay, I had ##q_1## and ##q_3## on my paper but I accidentally put ##q_2## in LaTeX. So placing the proper variables gives $$\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon}[\frac{q_1q_3\cos\theta(+\hat{\imath})}{(R_{13})^2}+\frac{q_1q_3\sin\theta(-\hat{\jmath})}{(R_{13})^2}]+\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon}[\frac{q_2q_3\cos\theta(+\hat{\imath})}{(R_{23})^2}+\frac{q_2q_3\sin\theta(+\hat{\jmath})}{(R_{23})^2}]$$ which after making the substitutions ##q_1=q_2##, ##R_{13}=R_{23}## and ##\cos\theta=\frac{x}{\sqrt{x^2+d^2}}## becomes $$\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon}\frac{2q_1q_3\cos\theta}{(R_{13})^2}=\frac{1}{4\pi\epsilon}\frac{16e^2x}{(x^2+d^2)^{3/2}}$$ which is pretty much the same expression as before just without the absolute values. x=0 would be where the y-axis intersects the x-axis in the image.
 
How do you know it is wrong? It looks correct, but you can substitute the the numerical values.
 
  • Like
Likes Potatochip911
ehild said:
How do you know it is wrong? It looks correct, but you can substitute the the numerical values.
In the second part of the question it asked to calculate where the force would be at a maximum and I thought the derivative was elementary enough that I wouldn't make a mistake on it so I assumed the original expression was incorrect. After looking over it again it turns out it's actually the derivative that I took incorrectly and the function ##F_3(x)## is correct.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K