How to solve the large deflection of the cantilever beam

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving large deflections in cantilever beams using the finite element method (FEM) and the Euler-Bernoulli beam theory. Participants emphasize that standard beam formulas, such as δ = PL³ / 3EI, are only applicable for small deflections, typically under 5°. For larger deflections, non-linear FEM should be utilized, particularly when analyzing beams with varying rigidity. MATLAB is highlighted as a suitable tool for this analysis, and the importance of accurately modeling the beam's loading conditions is stressed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finite element method (FEM) principles
  • Familiarity with Euler-Bernoulli beam theory
  • Knowledge of MATLAB for structural analysis
  • Basic concepts of beam deflection and flexural rigidity
NEXT STEPS
  • Research non-linear finite element methods for large deflection analysis
  • Study the elastica theory for cantilever beams
  • Explore MATLAB functions for structural analysis
  • Review case studies on non-homogeneous beam loading conditions
USEFUL FOR

Structural engineers, mechanical engineers, and researchers focusing on beam deflection analysis and finite element modeling will benefit from this discussion.

cvnaditya
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
how to solve the large deflection of the beam, i have tried using finite element method but unable to find it.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
cvnaditya said:
how to solve the large deflection of the beam, i have tried using finite element method but unable to find it.
I'm afraid your post is too vague to be able to respond to.

How large a deflection are you talking about?

Does the beam stress go beyond yield for the material of construction?

What type of finite element method was used?

What do you mean "unable to find it"?
 
Steamking before i also have the same doubt but when going through project i got to know there will be large defelction. according to strength of material we find deflection for slope angle of 0.5 when load acting at the end point. But when the load is increasing and the slope angles changes from 0.5-80 and goes on till the beam has its ability without break which depends on flexural rigidity. after certain value example when the slope is 85 degree the beam may break.

In strength of material we use the formula Pl3/3EI it is just to find out one maximum deflection but when we use finite element method we use sinx or cosx expansion n solve it. i am getting trouble near this some logic or basic parameter i am missing.
 
cvnaditya said:
Steamking before i also have the same doubt but when going through project i got to know there will be large defelction. according to strength of material we find deflection for slope angle of 0.5 when load acting at the end point. But when the load is increasing and the slope angles changes from 0.5-80 and goes on till the beam has its ability without break which depends on flexural rigidity. after certain value example when the slope is 85 degree the beam may break.

In strength of material we use the formula Pl3/3EI it is just to find out one maximum deflection but when we use finite element method we use sinx or cosx expansion n solve it. i am getting trouble near this some logic or basic parameter i am missing.

First, you should be aware that the standard beam formulas, like δ = PL3 / 3EI, are only valid when the slopes of the deflected shape are very small. Is a slope of 0.5° small enough for your particular beam? Only you know the answer to that. Certainly, when the slopes increase to 5° or 10°, let alone 80°, linear elastic beam theory no longer applies.

It appears that you are trying to calculate the elastica of this beam, which is how most large-deflection situations are treated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastica_theory

If you are using finite elements to find such a solution, make sure solving this problem is one which your software can handle. Generally, you would use a non-linear, rather than a linear, FEM.
 
  • Like
Likes cvnaditya
SteamKing said:
First, you should be aware that the standard beam formulas, like δ = PL3 / 3EI, are only valid when the slopes of the deflected shape are very small. Is a slope of 0.5° small enough for your particular beam? Only you know the answer to that. Certainly, when the slopes increase to 5° or 10°, let alone 80°, linear elastic beam theory no longer applies.

It appears that you are trying to calculate the elastica of this beam, which is how most large-deflection situations are treated.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elastica_theory

If you are using finite elements to find such a solution, make sure solving this problem is one which your software can handle. Generally, you would use a non-linear, rather than a linear, FEM.
I am using MATLAB for analysis, and this is my final analysis of the project. unable to get the equation and right method to get the result. Can you help me.
 
Please post a clear drawing showing all the details of the problem .
 
Nidum said:
Please post a clear drawing showing all the details of the problem .
As shown below figure. my cantilever is of two different rigidity modulus. At the end point of the beam, load is applied. As the load increase the beam tends deflects more, where θ value will be from 1° to 80°. i have to use finite element method to solve the problem.

IMG_20151021_211503.jpg
 
cvnaditya said:
As shown below figure. my cantilever is of two different rigidity modulus. At the end point of the beam, load is applied. As the load increase the beam tends deflects more, where θ value will be from 1° to 80°. i have to use finite element method to solve the problem.

View attachment 90539
As I mentioned in a previous post, using a linear FEM will probably not get you anywhere. You say you are also using Matlab.

At the bottom of the article linked below, there is a large-deflection theory described for uniform cantilever beams:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler–Bernoulli_beam_theory

Having a non-homogeneous beam like you do will only add complexity to the solution.

You can do a web search for more articles which may return hits for analyses which more closely resemble your particular beam.
 
In order to solve this problem use the Euler-Bernoulli principle for simple bending theory, it does also appear from your drawing that you have a "point end load" in oppose to uniformly distributed load.
This does make the answer somewhat easier to interpret
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
621
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
903
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K