How to understand typo in MIT OCW chapter on Poynting vector?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a potential typo in the MIT OCW chapter on the Poynting vector, specifically in the equations related to energy density and the Poynting vector. A participant highlights confusion over the transition from one equation to another, particularly regarding the factor of c. Clarification is provided that the relationship E = cB should be applied, which simplifies the equations and resolves the apparent discrepancy. The importance of accurately expressing the Poynting vector as a product of E and B is emphasized, as it reflects the energy current in electromagnetic waves. Overall, the discussion underscores the need for careful attention to detail in mathematical expressions within physics.
zenterix
Messages
774
Reaction score
84
Homework Statement
While reading a chapter about Poynting vector I reached a passage with what seems like a typo.
Relevant Equations
If it is a typo, I am still not sure how to fix it.

If it is not, then I am not sure what exactly was done in the algebra.
Here is a chapter from MIT OCW's 8.02 Electromagnetism course.

At the end of page 14 is section 13.6 "Poynting Vector". The calculations I am interested in are on page 15.

There is a passage that seems to have a typo in it. Let me try to show why despite recognizing a typo I am unsure of what the correct version would be.

Consider a plane wave passing through the infinitesimal volume element below

1716466499436.png


The total energy in the EM fields in the volume element is

$$dU=UAdx=(U_E+U_B)Adx=\left (\frac{1}{2}\epsilon_0E^2+\frac{1}{2\mu_0}B^2\right )Adx\tag{1}$$

$$=\frac{1}{2}\left (\epsilon_0E^2+\frac{B^2}{\mu_0}\right )Adx\tag{2}$$

The rate of change of energy per unit area is

$$S=\frac{dU}{dt}\frac{1}{A}=\frac{c}{2}\left (\epsilon_0E^2+\frac{B^2}{\mu_0}\right )\tag{2a}$$

where I have used the fact that the EM wave is traveling with speed ##c## and so ##dx=cdt##.

It can be shown that ##\frac{E}{B}=c=\frac{1}{\sqrt{\epsilon_0mu_0}}##, the speed of light.

The chapter then rewrites (2) but the expression seems to contain a typo. Here is the exact passage as it appears in the chapter

$$S=\frac{1}{2}\left (\epsilon_0E^2+\frac{B^2}{\mu_0}\right )=\frac{cB^2}{\mu_0}=c\epsilon_0E^2=\frac{EB}{\mu_0}\tag{3}$$

When I rewrite (2) I get

$$S=\frac{1}{2}\left (c\epsilon_0E^2+c\frac{B^2}{\mu_0}\right )$$

$$=\frac{1}{2}\left (\epsilon_0\frac{E^3}{B}+\frac{EB}{\mu_0}\right )$$

What am I missing?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Where did the added factor of c come from in your rewrite of equation (2)?
 
zenterix said:
$$S=\frac{1}{2}\left (\epsilon_0E^2+\frac{B^2}{\mu_0}\right )Adx=\frac{cB^2}{\mu_0}=c\epsilon_0E^2=\frac{EB}{\mu_0}\tag{3}$$

First of all, you have brought along an ##A\, dx## here that should be divided by ##A\, dt## in the first expression. Try to keep away from such mistakes as they lead to confusion as displayed in post #2.

zenterix said:
When I rewrite (2) I get

$$S=\frac{1}{2}\left (c\epsilon_0E^2+c\frac{B^2}{\mu_0}\right )$$

$$=\frac{1}{2}\left (\epsilon_0\frac{E^3}{B}+\frac{EB}{\mu_0}\right )$$

What am I missing?
You are missing that ##E = cB## so take ##E^2 = c^2 B^2## in the first term and it also becomes the same as the second term - resulting in cancelling the 1/2 in front.

The reason to write it as a product of ##E## and ##B## and not any other powers is that the Poynting vector is proportional to ##\vec E \times \vec B##. The Poynting vector is more general than what they are showing in this particular passage and you cannot get it directly from this argument (although you can use the argument to verify that the Poynting vector indeed describes the expected energy current for the particular situation).
 
@phyzguy I forgot one step. It is there now, equation (2a).
 
Orodruin said:
You are missing that E=cB so take E2=c2B2 in the first term and it also becomes the same as the second term - resulting in cancelling the 1/2 in front.
Ah yes. I need to get some sleep that is what I need to do. Then maybe I won't miss such things.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top