MHB How to use cauchy integral formula

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the Cauchy integral formula and the residue theorem in complex analysis. A user seeks guidance on when to use the Cauchy integral formula and how to identify the components f(z), z, and z₀. Another participant suggests using the residue theorem instead, explaining how to calculate the integral using the residue of the pole at z = -i. The original poster expresses a lack of familiarity with the residue theorem and prefers to use the Cauchy integral formula, which is then clarified with an example. The conversation concludes with the user indicating they understand the explanation provided.
aruwin
Messages
204
Reaction score
0
Hello.
How do I know when to use Cauchy integral formula. Why do we use the formula in this question? As you can see in my attempt, I got stuck.
What is f(z), z, z​0 here?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_6426.jpg
    IMG_6426.jpg
    34.6 KB · Views: 111
Physics news on Phys.org
aruwin said:
Hello.
How do I know when to use Cauchy integral formula. Why do we use the formula in this question? As you can see in my attempt, I got stuck.
What is f(z), z, z​0 here?

Instead of the Cauchy integral formula it is better for You to use the residue theorem that extablishes that...

$\displaystyle \int_{\gamma} f(z)\ dz = 2\ \pi\ i\ \sum_{j} r_{j}\ (1)$

... where $r_{j}$ is a residue of the j-th pole of f(*) inside $\gamma$. In your case the only pole inside $\gamma$ is z=-i and is...

$\displaystyle r_{1} = \lim_{z \rightarrow -i} \frac{(z+i)}{z^{2}+1} = \lim_{z \rightarrow -i} \frac{1}{z-i} = -\frac{1}{2\ i}\ (2)$

... so that is...

$\displaystyle \int_{\gamma} \frac{dz}{z^{2}+1}= - \pi\ (3)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Last edited:
chisigma said:
Instead of the Cauchy integral formula it is better for You to use the residue theorem that extablishes that...

$\displaystyle \int_{\gamma} f(z)\ dz = 2\ \pi\ i\ \sum_{j} r_{j}\ (1)$

... where $r_{j}$ is a residue of the j-th pole of f(*) inside $\gamma$. In your case the only pole inside $\gamma$ is z=-i and is...

$\displaystyle r_{1} = \lim_{z \rightarrow -i} \frac{(z+i)}{z^{2}+1} = \lim_{z \rightarrow -i} \frac{1}{z-i} = -\frac{1}{2\ i}\ (2)$

... so that is...

$\displaystyle \int_{\gamma} \frac{dz}{z^{2}+1}= - \pi\ (3)$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

But I haven't learned about residue yet. So, I think I have to solve it using cauchy.
 
aruwin said:
But I haven't learned about residue yet. So, I think I have to solve it using cauchy.

Very well!... so we remember that the Cauchy integral formula supplies the value of an f(z) if z is inside a closed contour $\gamma$ in which f(z) is analitic...

$\displaystyle f(a) = \frac{1}{2\ \pi\ i} \int_{\gamma} \frac{f(z)}{z-a}\ d z\ (1)$

If You choose $\displaystyle f(z) = \frac{1}{z-i}$, $a=-i$ and apply (1) You obtain...

$\displaystyle \int_{\gamma} \frac{d z}{1 + z^{2}} = - 2\ \pi\ i\ \frac{1}{2\ i} = - \pi$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$
 
Last edited:
chisigma said:
Very well!... so we remember that the Cauchy integral formula give the value of an f(z) if z is inside a closed contour $\gamma$ in which f(z) is analitic...

$\displaystyle f(a) = \frac{1}{2\ \pi\ i} \int_{\gamma} \frac{f(z)}{z-a}\ d z\ (1)$

If You choose $\displaystyle f(z) = \frac{1}{z-i}$, $a=-i$ and apply (1) You obtain...

$\displaystyle \int_{\gamma} \frac{d z}{1 + z^{2}} = - 2\ \pi\ i\ \frac{1}{2\ i} = - \pi$

Kind regards

$\chi$ $\sigma$

I got it! Thanks!
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
853
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K