How to Use Latex in Word (2007): A Faster Way to Type Formulas

  • Context: LaTeX 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Nick89
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Latex Mathtype
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the possibility of using LaTeX to type formulas in Microsoft Word 2007. Participants explore the practicality and functionality of integrating LaTeX with Word, comparing it to existing tools like MathType and the built-in equation editor.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the need for LaTeX in Word, suggesting that LaTeX is better suited for creating documents with extensive mathematical content.
  • Another participant expresses a preference for using Word for general text while occasionally needing to type formulas in LaTeX.
  • A suggestion is made that upgrading to MathType may allow for easier LaTeX input in Word, combining both TeX editing and point-and-click editing.
  • There is mention of a planned feature in MathType that would enable direct TeX input in Word and PowerPoint, allowing users to convert between TeX and MathType equations.
  • Concerns are raised about the effectiveness of the Microsoft Equation Writer for recognizing handwritten equations, with skepticism about its reliability for complex equations.
  • One participant highlights the advantages of structured editors like MathType over handwritten recognition, emphasizing speed and ease of use.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the necessity or effectiveness of using LaTeX in Word. Multiple competing views exist regarding the best approach for typing mathematical formulas, with some advocating for LaTeX and others for existing tools like MathType.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations are noted regarding the effectiveness of handwritten equation recognition and the potential challenges in using LaTeX within Word, particularly for users who are accustomed to other methods of input.

Nick89
Messages
553
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I don't know if this is the right place for my question, but here goes...

I was wondering if it is possible to use Latex to type formules (just like on this forum) in Word 2007.

I am now using either MathType or the built in equation editor but I think they're too much of a hassle since you can't really type the formula, you have to use your mouse a lot.
Would be much faster if I could just type \phi instead of grabbing the mouse, looking for \phi for 2 minutes and clicking it...

So is it possible, and if yes how can I use it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know if it is possible, but WHY do you want to use Latex forumulas in WORD when you can make better document using latex?

Latex was invented for that reason, to write articles with lots of math forumulas.
 
Because I like some of the functionalities of word. It's not like I'm only typing formulas, it's just the occasional formula. I would like to be able to type the formulas in latex and the rest just in plain old word...
 
If you want to use LaTeX in Word (and be able to easily edit it later), you probably have to upgrade to MathType http://www.dessci.com/en/products/mathtype/upgrades.htm .
Define Equations using TeX/LaTeX: If you already know the TeX typesetting language, you can enter equations quickly using MathType's TeX input mode. TeX editing can be mixed with point-and-click editing so you get the best of both worlds. You can also copy equations from existing TeX documents.

If you want to just generate the image of an equation, you can use an online tool (like http://www.sitmo.com/latex/ or http://hausheer.osola.com/latex2png or http://www.texify.com/ ). I use this method to use LaTeX-rendered equations in a Powerpoint slide. Of course, if you want to make a change, you have to go back and create a new image.

For longer documents, I just use LaTeX (MikTeX).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
We are planning to add direct TeX input to Word and eventually PowerPoint in the next release of MathType, due in a few months. The idea is that you type TeX inside equation delimiters, perhaps $$, and then when you are done with the run of TeX, you hit some sort of Ctrl key command (or a menu command) to convert it to a MathType equation. The same hot key can be used to turn it back into TeX. All of this is a bit preliminary though.

Paul Topping
Design Science, Inc.
 
That sounds great.
Any chance you could do something with the http://www.google.com/search?q="Microsoft+Equation+Writer"", which converts handwritten TabletPC ink into a graphic image of an equation? It seems that they were so close to creating an object (like a MathType-type equation) so that it can be edited later.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That does sound great! Hope to see that soon. Just hope my uni will get the latest version for us...
 
I don't know too much about Microsoft Equation Writer but recognition of hand-written equations is difficult. My guess is that it works for very simple cases but breaks down with equations of any complexity at all. Just like speech recognition, unless it works very, very well, it is too much trouble.

While recognition of hand-written equations may seem like a laudable goal, even if it worked I doubt whether it would be that great. In MathType, for example, one can insert a radical sign with Ctrl-R or a fraction with Ctrl-F. While one could argue that drawing a radical sign or a fraction requires less learning, I think learning Ctrl-R or F is pretty easy and is much, much faster. The argument gets even stronger when you look at MathType's ability to let you select a common sub-expression, drag it to the toolbar and then insert it later with just a click. Finally, when you hand-write a fraction or radical sign you must guess at how much space to leave for the stuff that must go into it. If you guess wrong, you have to erase or extend the original. In MathType, or any other structured editor, this problem does not occur. The radical or fraction just expands as you insert stuff into it. I suppose there may be some kind of hand-writing interface that could do all these things but my guess is that it is just not going to happen.

Paul Topping
Design Science, Inc.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K