How to use the work-energy theorem to find mu?

In summary: The Attempt at a Solution for the Mu:At first, you try to use the "elementary" method of summation of forces along the axes, but since we're talking about collisions, you should use the work-energy theorem. However, you don't know how to put mu into the equation: KE=1/2(m)(v2) For the speed limit, well, it's an inelastic collision obviously... one car is at rest but they didn't give out the vi1 of the yellow car. Therefore, you can assume that the horizontal force is from the spring scale and the vertical force is from the friction block. So, you get:Fvertical=88
  • #1
jshot079
7
0

Homework Statement


please check this link out to make it simpler to understand...

http://www.scribd.com/doc/62694749/MC-Collision1D2

there is a friction block and a spring scale... it gives two measurements (the vertical force and the horizontal force)
Fvertical=88.2 N and
Fhorizontal=75.8 N
now I'm suppose to find the coefficient of friction...
and also, I'm suppose to find out if the driver exceeded the 70 km/h speed limit
please help me out!

Homework Equations


m1vi1+m2vi2 = (m1+m2)vf

KE=1/2(m)(v2)

The Attempt at a Solution


for the mu:
at first, i tried to use the "elementary" method of summation of forces along the axes but since we're talking about collisions, i think i should use the work-energy theorem... but now i don't know how to put mu into the equation: KE=1/2(m)(v2)
...

for the speed limit:
well, it's an inelastic collision obviously... one car is at rest but they didn't give out the vi1 of the yellow car...

please help! i ran out of ideas on how to solve this!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Welcome to Physics Forums. I'm going to copy-and-paste the problem statement, just because that makes it easier to discuss here.

You are just starting a summer job for PDRM collision investigators. You assist theinvestigators in order to determine, as accurately as possible, the circumstancessurrounding collisions (initial velocity of the vehicles involved, direction vehicles wereheading, etc.) in order to take action against drivers at fault under the Criminal Code(dangerous driving causing death or other charges). The job is demanding and your help ishighly appreciated. The weather is great, it’s July, and youarrive at the station as your boss tells you,“Hey, Rookie, hurry over to Kangar Street. There has been an accident involving twocars. There are people injured.” Listeningonly to your courage, you rush (althoughcarefully) to the scene of the accident. Your job is to take photos of the vehicles as theyare positioned, and take a certain number of measurements, including the length of theskid marks and layout of the debris. Youimmediately draw the following sketch of the accident and include a few common measurements.


Left: Vehicle 1 starts braking - - - - - Center: Impact - - - - - Right: Final position of vehicles
- - - - - 30 m skid marks for Vehicle 1 braking - - - - - 12.25 m skid marks after impact
1-bcc0f0adaa.jpg

Your findings are as follows:
•Numerous debris (broken glass, plastic, etc.) were found at a distance of 12.25 mfrom the cars;
•The two cars stuck together and there are skid marks over 12.25 m;
•There are also skid marks over a distance of 30 m before the debris;
•The posted speed limit on this street is 70 km/h;
•Other data: m1 = 2.674 kg, m2= 1.100 kg

jshot079 said:

Homework Statement


please check this link out to make it simpler to understand...

http://www.scribd.com/doc/62694749/MC-Collision1D2

there is a friction block and a spring scale... it gives two measurements (the vertical force and the horizontal force)
Fvertical=88.2 N and
Fhorizontal=75.8 N
now I'm suppose to find the coefficient of friction...
Okay. What is an equation that involves friction force and coefficient of friction?
and also, I'm suppose to find out if the driver exceeded the 70 km/h speed limit
please help me out!

Homework Equations


m1vi1+m2vi2 = (m1+m2)vf
Good, that equation is the basis for solving problems like this.

KE=1/2(m)(v2)




The Attempt at a Solution


for the mu:
at first, i tried to use the "elementary" method of summation of forces along the axes but since we're talking about collisions, i think i should use the work-energy theorem... but now i don't know how to put mu into the equation: KE=1/2(m)(v2)
...

for the speed limit:
well, it's an inelastic collision obviously... one car is at rest but they didn't give out the vi1 of the yellow car...
They don't give vi1 because that is what you are supposed to find out.

For starters, I would:

1. Figure out what μ, the coef. of friction, is. You can use the measurements Fvertical=88.2 N and Fhorizontal=75.8 N, along with the usual equation that involves friction force and μ.

2. Figure out how fast the two cars were going after the collision. You can use the 12.25 stopping distance, and what the acceleration must have been given the μ calculated previously.
 
  • #3
thanks for confirming and killing any doubts i have.

for the mu, i used the equation for the spring scale and friction block


µ = Fspring /Fnormal
µ =Fspring /(mblock •g )

so i assumed that the horizontal force is from the spring scale and the vertical force is from the friction block...

so i got:

= 75.8/88.2
µ = 0.86

i don't think I'm right... my physics professor said that i should use the work and KE theorem to solve for mu... how am i suppose to do that?
 
  • #4
You are correct on µ. It sounds like your professor misspoke (or, possibly, was misheard? :smile:). Work and KE theorem can be used to find velocities that are relevant to this problem, but that involves knowing µ already -- which now you do.

jshot079 said:
m1vi1+m2vi2 = (m1+m2)vf
What are the unknown quantities here? The next step is to work on finding their values, and the KE theorem will be useful.
 
  • #5
hahah... tnx! I knew i was right... one way or another.
with that out of the way...

so now i got
m1=2.674 kg
m2=1.100 kg
vi2=0
and with two unknowns...

vi1=?
vf =?

and in order to fine them i got these two equations...
vi1=(m1+m2)vf/m1 and
vf= m1vi1/(m1+m2)

hmm... would i be wrong if i substituted 70m/s to via? if i am... is there any way to find via and vf at the same time with putting mu and distance into these equations?
 
  • #6
jshot079 said:
vi1=(m1+m2)vf/m1
Yes, so if you can find vf then you'll have vi1.
hmm... would i be wrong if i substituted 70m/s to via? if i am... is there any way to find via and vf at the same time with putting mu and distance into these equations?
Yes, 70 m/s would be wrong, and for two reasons. (1) It's 70 km/hr, not m/s, but more importantly (2) that is the posted speed limit, and we can't assume the driver's velocity was at the speed limit -- we'd already have our answer then, wouldn't we?

Instead, apply the work-energy theorem to find vf.

Work-energy theorem: W = Fnet·d = ΔKE

Apply that to the final 12.25 m distance that the two vehicles travel before coming to a stop.
 
  • #7
oh my God, thank you!
i just had that Eureka moment with your help!
XD
 
  • #8
ok!
So this is what i did...

well first you need to find Fnet so...
its
Ʃfx
Fa-Ff=+ma

since the velocity is constant... i think that acceleration is zero... so i get

75.8-Ff=0
________________________________
and next...
ƩFy
FN-Fw=0
FN=Fw
FN=88.2

and if we apply the coefficient of friction to the Ʃfx... we still get zero so it checks...
_____________________
so our Fnet=88.2

using that we get...
W = Fnet·d
W = 88.2(12.25)
W = 1080.45
________________________
then applying the energy-work theorem wherein W=ΔKE
ΔKE=1/2mv2
1080.45=1/2(2.674)(v2)
1080/1.337 = v2
808.12=v2
v= 28.43

Right?

Thank you for not giving up on me and for not giving me the answers directly and letting my brain do some work...

so all in all... i won't be pressing charges because he did not exceed the speed limit... it's the red car's fault for stopping anyway... heheh
 
  • #9
but before doing that... i should watch the units more carefully next time...

yeah... i will have to charge the yellow car with over speeding... i should really know my units...

so i converted 70 km/hr to m/s

and i get 19.44m/s
and the driver did... get over that limit...

sorry, sometimes I'm a klutz...
 
  • #10
jshot079 said:
ok!
So this is what i did...

well first you need to find Fnet so...
its
Ʃfx
Fa-Ff=+ma

since the velocity is constant... i think that acceleration is zero... so i get

75.8-Ff=0
Let me stop you here.

What is this force Fa? Is it a force that acts on the cars? If you haven't already, draw yourself a force diagram that describes the cars skidding 12.25 m after the collision.

After the collision, the cars are going at speed vf, then the come to a stop (v=0) in 12.25 m. So the speed changes, it is not constant.

ƩFy
FN-Fw=0
FN=Fw
FN=88.2
88.2 N is the weight of the friction block. The cars are different than that, right?
 
Last edited:
  • #11
doh! me and my hastiness...
i will work on this!
 

1. How do I use the work-energy theorem to find mu?

The work-energy theorem states that the work done on an object is equal to the change in its kinetic energy. To use this theorem to find mu, you will need to know the initial and final velocities of the object, as well as the distance over which the force is applied. Once you have this information, you can use the equation W = ΔK, where W is the work done, Δ is the change in kinetic energy, and K is the kinetic energy. From there, you can rearrange the equation to solve for mu.

2. Can the work-energy theorem be used for all types of forces?

Yes, the work-energy theorem can be used for all types of forces, as long as the force is constant and the object is moving in a straight line. This includes forces such as friction, gravity, and applied forces.

3. What is the significance of mu in the work-energy theorem?

In the context of the work-energy theorem, mu represents the coefficient of friction between two surfaces. This is important because it affects the amount of work done on an object and therefore the change in its kinetic energy.

4. What are the units for mu in the work-energy theorem?

The units for mu in the work-energy theorem depend on the units used for force and distance. If force is measured in Newtons and distance is measured in meters, then mu will be unitless. However, if different units are used, such as pounds for force and feet for distance, then mu will have units of pounds per foot.

5. Can the work-energy theorem be used in situations where there is non-conservative forces present?

No, the work-energy theorem can only be used in situations where there are no non-conservative forces present. Non-conservative forces, such as friction or air resistance, dissipate energy and therefore cannot be accounted for using the work-energy theorem. In these situations, other energy conservation principles, such as the principle of conservation of mechanical energy, must be used.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
453
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
681
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
988
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
266
Back
Top