How were logs and roots calculated before calculators?

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter dpm
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Calculators Roots
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on historical techniques for calculating logarithms and square roots before the advent of calculators. Participants highlight the use of slide rules and a specific algorithm for calculating square roots known as the "divide-and-average" method. This method involves iterative calculations to refine the estimate of a square root, demonstrating accuracy comparable to modern calculators. Additionally, the discussion references Newton's Method as a foundational approach for finding roots of nonlinear functions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic arithmetic operations (addition, division).
  • Familiarity with iterative algorithms and their applications.
  • Knowledge of Newton's Method for finding roots of functions.
  • Basic concepts of logarithms and square roots.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the "divide-and-average" method for square root calculations.
  • Study the principles and applications of slide rules in mathematical computations.
  • Explore Newton's Method in detail, including its derivation and use cases.
  • Investigate historical mathematical texts that discuss pre-calculator techniques.
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, educators teaching historical computation methods, and enthusiasts interested in the evolution of mathematical techniques prior to modern technology.

dpm
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
I'm not sure whether this is the correct forum, so I apologise if it's in the incorrect forum.

Anyway, when studying A level maths a few years ago, we came across a technique for calculating roots that my teacher claimed was used before calculators were invented. I can't remember the actual technique used, but I remember thinking at the time that it was particularly clever. He also claimed that before calculators, mathematicians were forced to invent other, similarly clever techniques to work out their logs and roots etc.

So, what were these techniques? How exactly were the logs and roots calculated before modern computing machines?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
How is it possible that BobG hasn't shown up in this thread yet? :biggrin:
 
There is an algorithm to calculate square roots to any required degree of accuracy with merely pen and paper alone. I learned it from a book published in about 1920 aimed at 16 year olds when I was about 10; the book is also no longer in print. Anyway, my point is, I can't really remember it, but if someone really wanted to, I could half-remember and half-work it out. Or maybe someone else knows it too.
 
masudr said:
There is an algorithm to calculate square roots to any required degree of accuracy with merely pen and paper alone. I learned it from a book published in about 1920 aimed at 16 year olds when I was about 10; the book is also no longer in print. Anyway, my point is, I can't really remember it, but if someone really wanted to, I could half-remember and half-work it out. Or maybe someone else knows it too.
Suppose you want the squareroot of 55. It must lie between 7 and 8.
Try 7.5. \frac{55}{7.5} = 7.333
Now, calculate the mean:
\frac{7.5 + 7.333}{2} = 7.41666
and use it in the new iteration:
\frac{55}{7.41666} = 7.41573
\frac{7.4166 + 7.41573}{2} = 7.416198468
Using the calculator of Windows, you get for the squareroot of 55 the value 7.416198487...
 
This "divide-and-average" method can be derived using the more general http://planetmath.org/encyclopedia/NewtonsMethod.html of finding zeroes of nonlinear functions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
These algorithms are slow; a faster one realizes that
(10a+b)^2 = 100a^2 + 20ab + b^2
and works out the digits of the square root based on pairs of digits of the square, by finding a b such that b(20a+b) matches whatever is left (having subtracted the first term already).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K