How Were the Atomic Weights Calculated in Question 50?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ZedCar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Atomic
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the calculation of atomic weights as referenced in a specific problem. Participants are examining the values associated with atomic mass units (amu) and their derivation in the context of nuclear reactions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning how specific atomic weight values were obtained and whether they involve a constant. There is an exploration of the relationship between atomic weights and the number of nucleons in nuclear reactions.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights and questioning assumptions about the calculations. Some guidance on the nature of atomic weights and their non-linear relationship with nucleons has been offered, though no consensus has been reached.

Contextual Notes

There is a reference to external sources for atomic weights, and the original poster's inquiry suggests a potential misunderstanding of how these values are derived in the context of fusion reactions.

ZedCar
Messages
353
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


In question 50 in this link:

http://www.tarleton.edu/Faculty/alow/prob21.htm

I was wondering how the numbers 4.00260 amu + 1.00867 amu – 2.01410 amu – 3.01605 amu been obtained?

Thank you.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you.

The first part of question 50 states 2H + 3H → 4He + 1n

So are they multiplying these numbers by a certain constant to arrive at the numbers of 4.00260 amu + 1.00867 amu – 2.01410 amu – 3.01605 amu

If so, what is this constant?

As the numbers do look just slightly more than the numbers which I have emboldened.
 
they're not a constant times anything, atomic weight is not a linear function of the number of nucleons

fuse two protons (1H) together, that's two lots of 1.00867 = 2.01734, you get a 2H (= 2.01410) and some energy left over, which is the energy of fusion that they're trying to make use of in fusion reactors
 
tiny-tim said:
you get a 2H

You may want to change it to something closer to reality :wink:
 
oops! :biggrin:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
9K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K