A HQET Feynman Rule: QCD Interaction Vertex Explained

Elmo
Messages
37
Reaction score
6
TL;DR Summary
A slight confusion about HQET Feynman rules ,as stated in most texts.
Several texts state the vertex HQET Feynman rule as : igTijvμ\frac{1}{1+\slashed{v}} with the reasoning for vμ presented as being due to the QCD interaction vertex being between two heavy quark propagators, which are \frac{1+\slashed{v}}{2v.k}, giving :
vμ\frac{1+\slashed{v}}{2}=\frac{1+\slashed{v}}{2}γμ\frac{1+\slashed{v}}{2}.

So in general, shouldn't the vertex rule be the same as in QCD ? The only difference being the heavy quark propagator.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
and for some reason latex is not supported in this box, or am I missing something ?
 
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top