A HQET Feynman Rule: QCD Interaction Vertex Explained

Click For Summary
The HQET Feynman rule for the QCD interaction vertex is expressed as igTijvμ/(1+slashed{v}), which is derived from the interaction between heavy quark propagators. The reasoning for the vector vμ is based on the heavy quark propagators being represented as (1+slashed{v})/(2v.k). There is a discussion about whether the vertex rule should align with standard QCD rules, with the only distinction being the heavy quark propagator. Additionally, users express frustration over the lack of LaTeX support in the discussion box for proper mathematical representation. The conversation emphasizes the need for clarity in the application of the vertex rule in the context of heavy quarks.
Elmo
Messages
37
Reaction score
6
TL;DR
A slight confusion about HQET Feynman rules ,as stated in most texts.
Several texts state the vertex HQET Feynman rule as : igTijvμ\frac{1}{1+\slashed{v}} with the reasoning for vμ presented as being due to the QCD interaction vertex being between two heavy quark propagators, which are \frac{1+\slashed{v}}{2v.k}, giving :
vμ\frac{1+\slashed{v}}{2}=\frac{1+\slashed{v}}{2}γμ\frac{1+\slashed{v}}{2}.

So in general, shouldn't the vertex rule be the same as in QCD ? The only difference being the heavy quark propagator.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
and for some reason latex is not supported in this box, or am I missing something ?
 
Hi everyone, I am doing a final project on the title " fundamentals of neutrino physics". I wanted to raise some issues with neutrino which makes it the possible way to the physics beyond standard model. I am myself doing some research on these topics but at some points the math bugs me out. Anyway, i have some questions which answers themselves confounded me due to the complicated math. Some pf them are: 1. Why wouldn't there be a mirror image of a neutrino? Is it because they are...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
4K