HQET Feynman Rule: QCD Interaction Vertex Explained

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The HQET (Heavy Quark Effective Theory) Feynman rule for the QCD (Quantum Chromodynamics) interaction vertex is defined as igTijvμ(1/(1+slashed{v})). This formulation arises from the interaction between two heavy quark propagators, represented as (1+slashed{v})/(2v.k). The discussion emphasizes that the vertex rule should align with standard QCD principles, with the primary distinction being the heavy quark propagator's influence. The lack of LaTeX support in the forum is noted as a limitation for expressing complex equations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Heavy Quark Effective Theory (HQET)
  • Familiarity with Quantum Chromodynamics (QCD)
  • Knowledge of Feynman rules and propagators
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for typesetting equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of HQET Feynman rules in detail
  • Explore the implications of heavy quark propagators in QCD
  • Learn about the role of LaTeX in scientific documentation
  • Investigate the differences between HQET and standard QCD formulations
USEFUL FOR

Particle physicists, theoretical physicists, and students studying quantum field theory who seek to understand the nuances of heavy quark interactions in QCD.

Elmo
Messages
37
Reaction score
6
TL;DR
A slight confusion about HQET Feynman rules ,as stated in most texts.
Several texts state the vertex HQET Feynman rule as : igTijvμ\frac{1}{1+\slashed{v}} with the reasoning for vμ presented as being due to the QCD interaction vertex being between two heavy quark propagators, which are \frac{1+\slashed{v}}{2v.k}, giving :
vμ\frac{1+\slashed{v}}{2}=\frac{1+\slashed{v}}{2}γμ\frac{1+\slashed{v}}{2}.

So in general, shouldn't the vertex rule be the same as in QCD ? The only difference being the heavy quark propagator.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
and for some reason latex is not supported in this box, or am I missing something ?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K