Undergrad Why Isn't My OLED Screen Image at Infinity in My HUD Setup?

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the challenges of creating a heads-up display (HUD) with an OLED screen that projects a virtual image at infinity. The user describes two setups: one using lasers, which successfully collimate light, and another with an OLED screen that fails to produce an image at infinity. The issue arises because the current optical setup only outputs parallel beams without adjusting the image distance. Additionally, a plano-concave lens is mentioned as part of the overall assembly needed to correct aberrations and improve image quality. Proper lens configuration is essential for achieving a crisp, clear virtual image from the OLED screen.
Smooth
Messages
6
Reaction score
3
Hi,

I am trying to create an HUD display - basically create a virtual image at infinity and look at it. I have two plano-convex lenses; the distance between them is the sum of their focal lengths; my object is therefore imaged at infinity. Here is the schematics that I'm pretty much trying to make:

HUD optics:
HUD.jpg
Virtual image at infinity (Galilean Telescope):
inage at infinity.gif

set-up 1.jpg

Set-up 1: (with lasers)
I have two plano-convex fresnel lenses with the focal lengths of ~120mm each; I position them with ~240mm between them (sum of two focal lengths). I have an object on the right; after the light from it passes through my lenses, the rays should be collimated. They are - the distances between the rays of the light source and between the points on the image on the right are about the same (5cm vs 5.5cm. As good as it gets though. Is it because the lenses are not perfectly vertical?).
set-up 2.jpg

Set-up 2, OLED screen, no lasers.
Now I get rid of the lasers, I put the OLED screen instead, put a beam splitter to the left of all the lenses, and an LCD screen behind the beam splitter.
This way when I look at the beam splitter I see both images - from OLED (went through optics) and from LCD. However, the image from OLED screen is not at infinity: I have to focus my eyes on the LCD, then refocus to the OLED.

Why does it happen - why isn’t the OLED image at infinity? I want the virtual image from OLED screen to be always crisp and clear - well, imaged at infinity.

Also, there is a plano-concave lens on the schematic that explains the HUD. What's its purpose? I don’t quite get it.

I would really appreciate some help here; many thanks in advance.
 

Attachments

  • HUD.jpg
    HUD.jpg
    11.8 KB · Views: 2,640
  • inage at infinity.gif
    inage at infinity.gif
    10.6 KB · Views: 2,290
  • set-up 1.jpg
    set-up 1.jpg
    34 KB · Views: 1,892
  • set-up 2.jpg
    set-up 2.jpg
    56.7 KB · Views: 1,795
Physics news on Phys.org
Smooth said:
View attachment 214376
Set-up 1: (with lasers)
You put parallel beams in and get parallel beams out, so your setup doesn't change the image distance.
Smooth said:
View attachment 214377
Set-up 2, OLED screen, no lasers.

OLED screen is not at infinity:
Of course not. Your setup only outputs parallel beams, if you put parallel beams in.
 
Smooth said:
Why does it happen - why isn’t the OLED image at infinity? I want the virtual image from OLED screen to be always crisp and clear - well, imaged at infinity.

Your setup does not produce an image at infinity. Try placing the LCD screen at the focal point of one of the lenses and then viewing this light via the beamsplitter.

Smooth said:
Also, there is a plano-concave lens on the schematic that explains the HUD. What's its purpose? I don’t quite get it.

That lens is just part of the overall lens assembly that correctly focuses the light. Simple plano-convex lenses cannot create a high-quality image due to aberrations introduced to the image as the light passes through. You need a number of different lenses of different shapes, focal lengths, and refractive indices.
 
I do not have a good working knowledge of physics yet. I tried to piece this together but after researching this, I couldn’t figure out the correct laws of physics to combine to develop a formula to answer this question. Ex. 1 - A moving object impacts a static object at a constant velocity. Ex. 2 - A moving object impacts a static object at the same velocity but is accelerating at the moment of impact. Assuming the mass of the objects is the same and the velocity at the moment of impact...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
21K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
58
Views
8K
Replies
9
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K