José Ricardo
- 92
- 5
When the camera can oversee the human eyes?
The discussion revolves around the comparative capabilities of cameras and human eyes in perception. Participants explore various aspects such as light gathering ability, image resolution, subject resolution, and speed of capture, considering different contexts and criteria for evaluation.
Participants do not reach a consensus on whether cameras are definitively better than human eyes, as opinions vary based on specific criteria and contexts. Multiple competing views remain regarding the advantages of each.
Participants mention various factors that influence performance, such as the type of subject being observed and the specific technology used in cameras, indicating that comparisons may depend on situational variables.
There is probably a language barrier here, but the general answer is yes. But the criteria for judging should be given.José Ricardo said:When the camera can oversee the human eyes?
.Scott said:I believe your asking when can a camera see better that human eyes.
It depends on what you're looking at.
Light gathering ability:
- a combination of the aperture size (f-stop) and film/retina/sensor ISO rating.
Image resolution:
- retina has a variable resolution, cameras are measure in MegaPixels.
Subject resolution:
- Cameras can be outfitted as telescopic or with microscope lens systems.
Speed:
- Cameras and flash systems can capture images from high speed subjects.
russ_watters said:There is probably a language barrier here, but the general answer is yes. But the criteria for judging should be given.
I would not want to trade in my eyes for a camera.José Ricardo said:Taking a conclusion, is it better than the human eye?