I HUP for spin seems violated: 0 x sy > sz/2...?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter JBlue
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hup Spin
JBlue
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR Summary
After measuring Sx, we know its state exactly. This seems to violate Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle (HUP).
HUP for spins reads
$$\langle\sigma_z^2\rangle\langle\sigma_x^2\rangle \ge \frac{1}{4}|\langle\sigma_y\rangle|^2$$
Right after measuring ##\sigma_z##, we know it exactly, and so ##\langle\sigma_z^2\rangle=0##.
However, HUP then implies that ##\langle\sigma_y^2\rangle=\infty##

Even if we say that the uncertainty isn't ##0## but some small ##\epsilon##, we still get a ##\langle\sigma_y^2\rangle## that is very large, though it shouldn't be greater than ##\hbar##.

What am I missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hmm, considering a state ##|z^+\rangle##, I get the following quantities

##\sigma_x=1##
##\sigma_z=0##
##\sigma_x\sigma_z = 0##
##\frac{1}{2}|\langle\left[S_x,S_z\right]\rangle| = 0##
##\therefore \sigma_x\sigma_z \geq \frac{1}{2}|\langle\left[S_x,S_z\right]\rangle| = 0##

[edit] - So this is the the Robertson uncertainty relation. I also tested it for the schroedinger uncertainty relation and I also get ##0\geq0##
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes JBlue and topsquark
JBlue said:
TL;DR Summary: After measuring Sx, we know its state exactly. This seems to violate Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle (HUP).

HUP for spins reads
$$\langle\sigma_z^2\rangle\langle\sigma_x^2\rangle \ge \frac{1}{4}|\langle\sigma_y\rangle|^2$$
Right after measuring ##\sigma_z##, we know it exactly, and so ##\langle\sigma_z^2\rangle=0##.
However, HUP then implies that ##\langle\sigma_y^2\rangle=\infty##

Even if we say that the uncertainty isn't ##0## but some small ##\epsilon##, we still get a ##\langle\sigma_y^2\rangle## that is very large, though it shouldn't be greater than ##\hbar##.

What am I missing?
Let's see. You prepared the system in an eigenstate of ##s_x##, say in the eigenstate with ##\sigma_x=\hbar/2##. In the usual ##\hat{s}_z## eigenbasis, ##|\pm 1/2 \rangle##, it's
$$|\sigma_x=\hbar/2 \rangle=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(|1/2 \rangle +|-1/2 \rangle).$$
This gives
$$\langle \sigma_z \rangle=\langle \sigma_x =1/2|\hat{s}_z|\sigma_x=1/2 \rangle=0,$$
and
$$\langle \sigma_z^2 \rangle = \langle \sigma_x =1/2|\hat{s}_z^2|\sigma_x=1/2 \rangle=\hbar^2/4,$$
i.e.,
$$\Delta \sigma_z=\hbar/2.$$
In the same way you also get
$$\Delta \sigma_y=\hbar/2.$$
The HUP states that
$$\delta \sigma_y \Delta \sigma_z \geq \frac{\hbar}{2} |\langle (-\mathrm{i}) [\hat{s}_y,\hat{s}_z] \rangle|.$$
Now ##[\hat{s}_y,\hat{s}_z]=\mathrm{i} \hat{s}_x##. The expectation value on the right-hand side of our HUP thus is ##\hbar/2## and thus the right-hand side gives ##\hbar^2/4##, i.e., the HUP is valid with the equality sign.

If you want to apply the HUP to ##s_x## and ##s_z## you get ##0## on the left-hand side of the HUP, because you prepared an eigenstate of ##s_x## and thus ##\Delta s_z=0##. Then the HUP is of course always fulfilled. Of course it's not ##\langle s_z^2 \rangle## you have to use on the lefthand side of the HUP but the standard deviation, ##\Delta s_z##, which is defined as
$$\Delta s_z^2=\langle s_z^2 \rangle-\langle s_z \rangle^2.$$
 
  • Like
Likes JBlue and topsquark
Thanks, vanhees71, for walking through the example.
I had a silly confusion that is now perfectly cleared up!
 
Not an expert in QM. AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is quite different from the classical wave equation. The former is an equation for the dynamics of the state of a (quantum?) system, the latter is an equation for the dynamics of a (classical) degree of freedom. As a matter of fact, Schrödinger's equation is first order in time derivatives, while the classical wave equation is second order. But, AFAIK, Schrödinger's equation is a wave equation; only its interpretation makes it non-classical...
I am not sure if this falls under classical physics or quantum physics or somewhere else (so feel free to put it in the right section), but is there any micro state of the universe one can think of which if evolved under the current laws of nature, inevitably results in outcomes such as a table levitating? That example is just a random one I decided to choose but I'm really asking about any event that would seem like a "miracle" to the ordinary person (i.e. any event that doesn't seem to...
Back
Top