Hydrodynamics: Meniscus Height in Thin and Wide Cylinders

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter mkrems
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Hydrodynamics
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the behavior of the meniscus height in thin versus wide cylinders, emphasizing the role of hydrodynamics and surface tension. It is established that the curvature of the fluid-fluid interface near the contact line is influenced by the balance of wetting forces and buoyancy, as described by the Laplace equation. The height of the meniscus, denoted as "h," varies with the radius of the tube, while the curvature near the contact line remains consistent regardless of the cylinder's geometry. Additionally, there is a critical limit to the tube diameter, where extremely high pressures or low interfacial energies are required to fill nanometer-sized tubes.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of hydrodynamics and surface tension principles
  • Familiarity with the Laplace equation and its implications
  • Knowledge of fluid mechanics, particularly in relation to capillary action
  • Basic concepts of contact line dynamics and wetting forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Laplace equation and its applications in fluid mechanics
  • Explore capillary action in different geometries and materials
  • Investigate the effects of surface tension on meniscus formation in various fluids
  • Study the relationship between pore size and pressure requirements in fluid dynamics
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, engineers, and students in fluid mechanics, particularly those interested in capillarity, hydrodynamics, and surface interactions in various geometrical contexts.

mkrems
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
If I have some water in a thin (on the order of micrometer or nanometer even) cylinder, a
meniscus will form due to hydrodynamics and surface tension effects. There will be some characteristic height of the meniscus above the surface of the "bulk" water. Let's call this height "h". If I make the cylinder wider, say, to a macroscopic dimension, will this height "h"
remain the same or change? Please offer a reference if possible!

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand your question- a cylinder is not an equilibrium fluid shape, unless there is contact line pinning (and no bouyancy).

In any case, the surface of the fluid is not physically distinct from the bulk- the surface can be endowed with properties that result in discontinuous bulk properties (jump conditions), but the meniscus does not exist at some height off of the bulk.

Can you expand your question a little more?
 
I am now looking at my "macroscopically sized" glass of water. It looks pretty flat - no obvious meniscus.
 
Oh- I think I understand what the poster is referring to.

The fluid-fluid interface is curved in the vicinity of the contact line due to the balance of the wetting force and bouyancy (Laplace equation). The height of the meniscus, as compared to the fluid height of the reserviour (http://www.ce.utexas.edu/prof/kinnas/319LAB/Book/CH1/PROPS/caprisegif.html) will depend on the radius of the tube because of the mass of fluid that has to be pulled up. But, the small amount of curvature in the immediate vicinity of the contact line is independent of the geometry and will always be present.

http://www.up.ac.za/academic/civil/divisions/geotechnical/pgcourses/sgm782/themes/theme3/objectives3.html

(section 3.1 is of relevance)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Oh- I think I understand what the poster is referring to.

The fluid-fluid interface is curved in the vicinity of the contact line due to the balance of the wetting force and bouyancy (Laplace equation). The height of the meniscus, as compared to the fluid height of the reserviour (http://www.ce.utexas.edu/prof/kinnas/319LAB/Book/CH1/PROPS/caprisegif.html) will depend on the radius of the tube because of the mass of fluid that has to be pulled up. But, the small amount of curvature in the immediate vicinity of the contact line is independent of the geometry and will always be present.

http://www.up.ac.za/academic/civil/divisions/geotechnical/pgcourses/sgm782/themes/theme3/objectives3.html

(section 3.1 is of relevance)

And there is a lower limit to how small the tube can be- Laplace's equation again. It shows that the pressure required to drive fluid into a small void increases as the pore radius decreases. To get water into a nanometer sized tube requires extremely high pressures, or extremely low interfacial energies.

Edit- not sure why there was a pseudo double-post.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K