Hydrogen Atom Energy: Ratio of νBohr/νorbit

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the ratio of frequencies in Bohr's hydrogen atom, specifically νBohr and νorbit, as a function of the principal quantum number n. Participants are exploring the relationship between these frequencies and their behavior as n approaches infinity, referencing Bohr's correspondence principle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to derive the ratio νBohr/νorbit using equations related to energy levels and orbital characteristics. Questions arise regarding the dependence of radius and velocity on n, and whether the algebraic manipulations are correct.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's calculations and assumptions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need to account for variables that depend on n, and there is an ongoing exploration of the implications of these dependencies on the limit of the ratio as n increases.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, which may limit the information they can share. There are indications of confusion regarding unit consistency and the proper substitution of variables in their calculations.

v_pino
Messages
156
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



In Bohr’s hydrogen atom, the frequency of radiation for transitions between adjacent orbits
is νBohr = (En+1−En)/h. Classically, a charged particle moving in a circular orbit radiates
at the frequency of the motion, νorbit = v/2πr. Find the ratio νBohr/νorbit for the Bohr
orbits as a function of n. Evaluate the ratio for n = 1, 2, 5, 10, 100, and 1000, and thus show that νBohr/νorbit → 1 as n → ∞. This is an example of Bohr’s correspondence principle—that in the limit of large quantum numbers quantum-mechanical results agree with classical results.


Homework Equations



[tex]\nu_{Bohr}=(E_{n+1}-E_n)/h[/tex]

[tex]\nu_{orbit}=\frac{v}{2 \pi r}[/tex]

[tex]E_n= \frac{Z^2}{n^2}E_1[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution



From equation 3, can I say [itex]E_{n+1}= \frac{Z^2}{(n+1)^2}E_1[/itex] ?

Then doing the algebra gives me

[tex]\frac{\nu_{Bohr}}{\nu_{Orbit}}=(\frac{1}{(n+1)^2}-\frac{1}{n^2} )\frac{Z^2E_1}{h} \frac{2 \pi r}{v}[/tex]

Does that seem correct?

However, the values from the brackets of [itex]\frac{1}{(n+1)^2}-\frac{1}{n^2}[/itex] gives me -3/4, -5/36, ... which don't tend to 1.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks right so far. But you have not accounted for the fact that r and v are not constant but depend on n, which will affect the value of the limit for large n. (For example, r is larger for higher n, since higher energy states correspond to larger orbits.)
 
Now I have [itex]\frac{\nu_{Bohr}}{\nu_{Orbit}}=(\frac{n}{(n+1)^2}-1 )\frac{Z^2E_1}{h} \frac{2 \pi r}{v}[/itex] using [itex]r_n=\frac{n^2}{Z}a_0[/itex].

But even so, this only tells me that the brackets value is getting very small at large n.
 
You need to substitute an expression for vn as well.

Also, this was probably just a typo on your part, but inside the brackets in your previous post it should be
[tex]\left( \frac{n^2}{(n+1)^2}-1 \right)[/tex]
 
I now have the ratio [itex]= (\frac {n^3}{(n+1)^2}-n)\frac{E_1 \hbar^2}{mk^2e^2}[/itex]

But when I evaluate the non-bracket side, I get 1.28*10^-38.
Multiplying this to the bracket doesn't give me a value that tends to 1.
 
v_pino said:
I now have the ratio [itex]= (\frac {n^3}{(n+1)^2}-n)\frac{E_1 \hbar^2}{mk^2e^2}[/itex]
Something is wrong, the units are not working out correctly.
v_pino said:
Now I have [itex]\frac{\nu_{Bohr}}{\nu_{Orbit}}=(\frac{n}{(n+1)^2}-1 )\frac{Z^2E_1}{h} \frac{2 \pi r}{v}[/itex] using [itex]r_n=\frac{n^2}{Z}a_0[/itex].
If you have replaced r with n2a0/Z, then r shouldn't be in your expression, and a0 should be there. Also, what expression for vn did you use? If you show more of your steps, we should be able to figure out where things went wrong.
 
Is [itex]v_n=\frac{Zke^2}{n \hbar}=\frac{Z\alpha c}{n}[/itex]?
 
Is this right? [itex]= (\frac {n^3}{(n+1)^2}-n)\frac{E_1 \hbar^2}{mk^2e^4}[/itex]

The non bracket is now very big: 1.045*10^40.

I think the bracket tends to -2.
 
got it - thanks
 
  • #10
v_pino said:
Is this right? [itex]= (\frac {n^3}{(n+1)^2}-n)\frac{E_1 \hbar^2}{mk^2e^4}[/itex]
Looks good.
The non bracket is now very big: 1.045*10^40.
I get something different, perhaps you are not paying attention to units and just plugging in some numbers. So -- try including units in your calculation so that you can see them cancelling properly. If they don't cancel out, you probably have to convert some units somewhere. If it's still not working out after doing that, post your calculation of the non-bracket part here.
I think the bracket tends to -2.
I agree.
 
  • #11
v_pino said:
got it - thanks
Ah, glad it worked out :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K