Hydrogen Atom Hamiltonian & Schroedinger Equation

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Hamiltonian for the hydrogen atom is defined as H = (Pr)^2/2m + (L^2)/2mr^2 - e^2/r. The corresponding Schrödinger equation for bound states is given by ((Pr)^2/2m + (L^2)/2mr^2 - Ze^2/r + |E|)PHI = 0. The radial equation is expressed as {(-h/2m)[(1/r)(d^2/dr^2)r] + h^2l(l+1)/2mr^2 - e^2/r + |E|}R(r) = 0. A change of variable to u = rR(r) leads to the equation (-d^2/dr^2 + l(l+1)/r^2 - (2m/h^2)(e^2/r) + 2m|E|/h^2)u = 0, which simplifies the analysis of the radial function.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics principles
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics
  • Knowledge of the Schrödinger equation
  • Basic proficiency in differential equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the effective potential V_{eff} = (l(l+1)ħ^2)/(2mr^2) - (e^2)/(4πε₀r)
  • Learn about the significance of the radial function R(r) in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of the change of variable u = rR(r) in solving differential equations
  • Investigate the mathematical techniques for solving the radial Schrödinger equation
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists focusing on atomic structure, and anyone studying the mathematical foundations of the Schrödinger equation.

maria clara
Messages
56
Reaction score
0
the Hamiltonian for the hydrogen atom appears as

H= (Pr)^2/2m+(L^2)/2mr^2-e^2/r

The Schroedinger equation is

((Pr)^2/2m+(L^2)/2mr^2-Ze^2/r+|E|)PHI=0

|E| because we're looking for bound states.

m - reduced mass.

the radial equation is

{(-h/2m)[(1/r)(d^2/dr^2)r]+h^2l(l+1)/2mr^2-e^2/r+|E|}R(r)=0

(h denotes h-bar)

we change the the dependent variable to u=rR(r)

and we get

(-d^2/dr^2+l(l+1)/r^2-(2m/h^2)(e^2/r)+2m|E|/h^2)u=0

I don't understand how exactly the last equation is obtained. By the change u=rR, shouldn't we get the factor 1/r inside the brackets?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Maria,

In your first equation (the "Radial Equation"), you have 1/r in the first term - why not multiply both sides (or, just the left side, since the right side is just equal to zero) by r? This way, you get rid of the r in the first term, and when you distribute out the R(r) you can then make the substitution for U(r)=rR(r) (The "Radial Function"). At this point, most authors make the following substitution

[tex]V_{eff}=\frac{l(l+1)\hbar^2}{2mr^2}-\frac{e^2}{4\pi\epsilon_0 r}[/tex]

which simplifies things a bit. Of course, you'll have to substitute this back in eventually, however it may make it easier to see things temporarily. Additionally, following this it becomes convenient to make the following substitution

[tex]\rho=\frac{\sqrt{8m|E|}r}{\hbar}[/tex]

The math that follows this is really quite messy, however none of it is particularly difficult.
 
thank you(:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
46
Views
3K