Hydrogen Atom in an electric field along ##z##

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the behavior of a hydrogen atom in an electric field along the z-axis, specifically for the n=2 energy states. The first-order energy correction and zero-order state corrections were derived using the secular matrix method, resulting in specific eigenstates for the energy corrections. The user successfully computed the time-dependent state of the system and the expectation values of angular momentum operators, concluding that the calculations yield ⟨L_z⟩ = 0 and ⟨L^2⟩ = 2ħ² sin(ωt), where ω = W/ħ.

PREREQUISITES
  • Quantum mechanics fundamentals, particularly the Schrödinger equation
  • Understanding of angular momentum operators in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with perturbation theory and energy corrections
  • Knowledge of the hydrogen atom's wavefunctions and quantum numbers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study perturbation theory in quantum mechanics for deeper insights
  • Explore the derivation of eigenstates for different quantum systems
  • Learn about the implications of time-dependent quantum states
  • Investigate the effects of external electric fields on atomic systems
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in quantum mechanics, physicists studying atomic systems, and researchers interested in the effects of external fields on quantum states.

damarkk
Messages
12
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Hydrogen Atom, expectation value of ##L^2##, ##L_z## Perturbation Theory.
Relevant Equations
##\langle |L^2|\rangle##, ##\langle |L_z| \rangle##
There is an hydrogen atom on a electric field along ##z## ##E_z= E_{0z}## .

Consider only the states for ##n=2##. Solving the Saecular matrix for find the correction to first order for the energy and the correction to zero order for the states, we have:

##| \Psi_{211} \rangle##, ##| \Psi_{21-1} \rangle## for ##E^1_{2} = 0## that has degeneration equal to two, and

##\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(| \Psi_{200} \rangle ) +|\Psi_{210} \rangle)## for ##E^1_{2} = W##

##\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(| \Psi_{200} \rangle )- |\Psi_{210} \rangle)## for ##E^1_{2} = -W##

Where ##W## is the value of ##\langle \Psi_{200}| H'|\Psi_{210} \rangle##, ##H'=-eEz##.

Now the statement is: consider the state of the system at ##t=0## equal to ##|\Psi (0) \rangle = |\Psi_{210} \rangle##. Find the state at ##t>0## and calculate ##\langle L^2 \rangle##, ##\langle L_z \rangle##.


MY ATTEMPT



I find that ##|\Psi(t) \rangle = e^{-iE_2t/\hbar}(\cos{\omega t} |\Psi_{200} \rangle -i\sin{\omega t}|\Psi_{210} \rangle)##.

Now I compute ##\langle L_z \rangle## like that. The state of the physical system is described by eigenstates of ##L_z## and ##L^2## because I know that ##L_z |\Psi_{nlm} \rangle = m\hbar |\Psi_{nlm} \rangle## and ##L^2 |\Psi_{nlm} \rangle = \hbar^2 l(l+1) |\Psi_{nlm} \rangle##.

If this is correct, then ##\langle | L_z |\rangle = 0## and ##\langle | L^2 |\rangle = 2\hbar^2 \sin{\omega t}## where ##\omega = \frac{W}{\hbar}##.

Is this a correct answer and method?


I have also another question.
Why ##\langle L_z \rangle = 0##? Because the electric field is along ##z##, and the electron move along z axis: it doens't have any angular momentum component along z.

Why ##\langle L^2 \rangle \neq 0##? On the other hand, electron oscillates perpendicular to x and y axis and there is a component of angular momentum along it. But my question is: what is the variance of ##L_z##? In fact, ##\sigma^2 = \langle L_z^2 \rangle - \langle L_z \rangle ^2##, but if ##L_z |\Psi_{nlm} \rangle= m\hbar |\Psi_{nlm} \rangle##, then ##L_z^2 |\Psi_{nlm} \rangle= m^2\hbar^2 |\Psi_{nlm} \rangle## and is equal to zero because all the states before examinated (##|\Psi_{210} \rangle, |\Psi_{200} \rangle##) has ##m=0##. But if this is true, I can say correctly that ##\langle | L^2 |\rangle = \langle | L^2_x |\rangle+\langle | L^2_y |\rangle## and this last two are equal?
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K