Hydrogen Atom in an electric field along ##z##

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the behavior of a hydrogen atom in an electric field along the z-axis, specifically analyzing the n=2 states. The first-order energy correction for the states shows that the states |Ψ_{211}⟩ and |Ψ_{21-1}⟩ remain degenerate, while |Ψ_{200⟩ and |Ψ_{210⟩ are mixed for energy corrections. The state at time t=0 is given as |Ψ(0)⟩ = |Ψ_{210}⟩, leading to a time-dependent state |Ψ(t)⟩ that involves oscillatory behavior between |Ψ_{200}⟩ and |Ψ_{210}⟩. The calculations for the expectation values ⟨L_z⟩ and ⟨L^2⟩ yield results of 0 and 2ħ² sin(ωt), respectively, where ω is defined in terms of W. The method and results presented are confirmed as correct.
damarkk
Messages
12
Reaction score
2
Homework Statement
Hydrogen Atom, expectation value of ##L^2##, ##L_z## Perturbation Theory.
Relevant Equations
##\langle |L^2|\rangle##, ##\langle |L_z| \rangle##
There is an hydrogen atom on a electric field along ##z## ##E_z= E_{0z}## .

Consider only the states for ##n=2##. Solving the Saecular matrix for find the correction to first order for the energy and the correction to zero order for the states, we have:

##| \Psi_{211} \rangle##, ##| \Psi_{21-1} \rangle## for ##E^1_{2} = 0## that has degeneration equal to two, and

##\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(| \Psi_{200} \rangle ) +|\Psi_{210} \rangle)## for ##E^1_{2} = W##

##\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(| \Psi_{200} \rangle )- |\Psi_{210} \rangle)## for ##E^1_{2} = -W##

Where ##W## is the value of ##\langle \Psi_{200}| H'|\Psi_{210} \rangle##, ##H'=-eEz##.

Now the statement is: consider the state of the system at ##t=0## equal to ##|\Psi (0) \rangle = |\Psi_{210} \rangle##. Find the state at ##t>0## and calculate ##\langle L^2 \rangle##, ##\langle L_z \rangle##.


MY ATTEMPT



I find that ##|\Psi(t) \rangle = e^{-iE_2t/\hbar}(\cos{\omega t} |\Psi_{200} \rangle -i\sin{\omega t}|\Psi_{210} \rangle)##.

Now I compute ##\langle L_z \rangle## like that. The state of the physical system is described by eigenstates of ##L_z## and ##L^2## because I know that ##L_z |\Psi_{nlm} \rangle = m\hbar |\Psi_{nlm} \rangle## and ##L^2 |\Psi_{nlm} \rangle = \hbar^2 l(l+1) |\Psi_{nlm} \rangle##.

If this is correct, then ##\langle | L_z |\rangle = 0## and ##\langle | L^2 |\rangle = 2\hbar^2 \sin{\omega t}## where ##\omega = \frac{W}{\hbar}##.

Is this a correct answer and method?


I have also another question.
Why ##\langle L_z \rangle = 0##? Because the electric field is along ##z##, and the electron move along z axis: it doens't have any angular momentum component along z.

Why ##\langle L^2 \rangle \neq 0##? On the other hand, electron oscillates perpendicular to x and y axis and there is a component of angular momentum along it. But my question is: what is the variance of ##L_z##? In fact, ##\sigma^2 = \langle L_z^2 \rangle - \langle L_z \rangle ^2##, but if ##L_z |\Psi_{nlm} \rangle= m\hbar |\Psi_{nlm} \rangle##, then ##L_z^2 |\Psi_{nlm} \rangle= m^2\hbar^2 |\Psi_{nlm} \rangle## and is equal to zero because all the states before examinated (##|\Psi_{210} \rangle, |\Psi_{200} \rangle##) has ##m=0##. But if this is true, I can say correctly that ##\langle | L^2 |\rangle = \langle | L^2_x |\rangle+\langle | L^2_y |\rangle## and this last two are equal?
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top